Follow this request
There are 6 people following this request
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this requestAct on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Statute law
To Attorney General’s Office by Simon 1 September 2011
Can Government print its own notes?
To Her Majesty’s Treasury by lee edwardes 25 March 2011
Judicial Oath (clarification)
To Crown Prosecution Service by N. MacDonnchaidh 17 December 2010
Clarification of Statutory jurisdiction
To Crown Prosecution Service by Simon 4 September 2011
Who do you represent?
To Her Majesty’s Treasury by Simon 8 September 2011
Judicial Oath, request for clarification
To Ministry of Justice by N. MacDonnchaidh 20 January 2011
Queens Bench Rules
To Supreme Court of the United Kingdom by Mark Davies 18 August 2011
Dishonouring the Oath
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Mark 4 March 2011
Dishonouring the Oath
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Mark 4 March 2011
Dishonouring the Oath
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Mark 4 March 2011
Can you please clarify who you represent.
Simon made this Freedom of Information request to Crown Prosecution Service
The request was successful.
From: Simon
1 September 2011
Dear Crown Prosecution Service,
Can you please clarify who you represent is it her Majesty Queen
Elizabeth the 2nd or is it HER MAJERSTY IN RIGHT OF ENGLAND THE
SOVERIGN INDEPENDENT NATION OF THE INNER CITY OF LONDON the Crown
Corporation?
Yours faithfully,
Simon
From: Freedom of Information Unit
Crown Prosecution Service
2 September 2011
Dear Sir
Your request for information was received by the Information Management Unit on 2 September 2011. Please could you clarify the information you are seeking pursuant to Section 1(3) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
We refer specifically to the text you have written in block capitals and what you mean by 'Crown Corporation'? We will be unable to proceed with your request without clarification of what you mean as it is not clear what you are seeking or whether it is recorded information, as defined by the terms of the Act.
Please note that if we do not receive appropriate clarification of your information requirements within two months from the date of this email, we will consider your request closed.
Regards
Information Management Unit
show quoted sections
From: Simon
2 September 2011
Dear Freedom of Information Unit,
I apologize if my request for clarification was unclear please let
me clarify for you exactly what I mean.
Could you please clarify who you represent is it Her Majesty Queen
Elizabeth the 2nd. The Woman who swore an oath to uphold gods law
and the common law during the coronation ceremony in which she took
the thrown of the United Kingdom?
Or do you represent HER MAJERSTY IN RIGHT OF ENGLAND The Sovereign
independent nation of the inner city of London The Crown
Corporation?
Also known as, THE CORPORATION OF LONDON, THE CITY OF LONDON
CORPORATION.
As I am sure you are aware that the capital letters mealy
distinguish the artificial person. from a Man or Woman. The term
artificial person as defined in black’s law dictionary 9th edition
is An entity, such as a corporation, created by law and given
certain legal rights and duties of a human being; a being, real or
imaginary, who for the purpose of legal reasoning is treated more
or less as a human being .• An entity is a person for purposes of
the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses but is not a citizen
for purposes of the Privileges and Immunities Clauses in Article IV
§ 2 and in the Fourteenth Amendment - Also termed fictitious
person; juristic person; juridical person; legal person; moral
person. Cf. LEGAL ENTITY. [Cases: Corporations
I hope this explains what it is I am asking you to clarify under
the freedom of information act
I simply wish to know if you represent Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth
the 2nd?
Or the Crown corporation as defined above?
Yours sincerely,
Simon
From: Simon
3 September 2011
Dear Crown Prosecution Service,
I apologize if my request for clarification was unclear please let
me clarify for you exactly what I mean.
Could you please clarify who you represent is it Her Majesty Queen
Elizabeth the 2nd. The Woman who swore an oath to uphold gods law
and the common law during the coronation ceremony in which she
took
the thrown of the United Kingdom?
Or do you represent HER MAJERSTY IN RIGHT OF ENGLAND The Sovereign
independent nation of the inner city of London The Crown
Corporation?
Also known as, THE CORPORATION OF LONDON, THE CITY OF LONDON
CORPORATION.
As I am sure you are aware that the capital letters mealy
distinguish the artificial person. from a Man or Woman. The term
artificial person as defined in black’s law dictionary 9th edition
is An entity, such as a corporation, created by law and given
certain legal rights and duties of a human being; a being, real or
imaginary, who for the purpose of legal reasoning is treated more
or less as a human being .• An entity is a person for purposes of
the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses but is not a citizen
for purposes of the Privileges and Immunities Clauses in Article
IV
§ 2 and in the Fourteenth Amendment - Also termed fictitious
person; juristic person; juridical person; legal person; moral
person. Cf. LEGAL ENTITY. [Cases: Corporations
I hope this explains what it is I am asking you to clarify under
the freedom of information act
I simply wish to know if you represent Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth
the 2nd?
Or the Crown corporation as defined above?
Yours faithfully,
Simon
Chris: of the family Montgomery left an annotation ( 1 October 2011)
I was told to say "Her Majesty in 'Rite', not 'Right'"
David left an annotation (26 October 2011)
My goodness. It is now some 54 days since this very simple question was put, yet no response has been proffered.
It will therefore be assumed that the CPS is indeed acting at the behest of the Crown Corporation of London and as such explains why the aggressions against the peoples of these islands relentlessly continue.
In absence of a reply it should be also concluded that there is not a lawfully binding contract between the people and this corporate entity.
Unless of course a reply from the CPS affirms that they are acting for Queen Elizabeth II of the House of Windsor.
Tick tock, tick tock.
David left an annotation (27 October 2011)
It is now some 54 days since this very simple question was put, yet no response has been proffered.
It will therefore be assumed that the CPS is indeed acting at the behest of the Crown Corporation of London and as such explains why the aggressions against the peoples of these islands relentlessly continue.
In absence of a reply it should be also concluded that there is not a lawfully binding contract between the people and this corporate entity.
Unless of course a reply from the CPS affirms that they are acting for Queen Elizabeth II of the House of Windsor.
Tick tock, tick tock.
Ann Reeves left an annotation (27 October 2011)
They are all in together.. these people are a disgrace to society but do they care... all it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing...
From: Freedom of Information Unit
Crown Prosecution Service
28 October 2011
Dear Simon,
It's come to my attention that as I answered both of the requests you lodged with the Crown Prosecution Service in a single letter, the issued response does not feature in this request strand. I hereby attach the response issued to this request along with the original e-mail to demonstrate that the request was answered within the statutory deadline.
Regards,
Paul Willman
Information Management Unit
show quoted sections
David left an annotation (29 October 2011)
I can confirm for those of you that are interested in who the CPS are commanded by and it, by their own admission IS NOT QUEEN ELIZABETH II.
Some of you will recall the contents of the affidavit submitted to HRH Queen ELizabeth II by John Harris as well as the equital of the character known as Maud Dib on the basis of the oath sworn.
I now have it confirmed by an officer of the CPS that they are controlled by "The State". Thus given that the "state" can be evidenced to be working at the behest of the dominant corporations and finance houses by the actions of government (austerity). We can conclude that it is indeed the Crown Corporation and others that are behind the transgressions of Tort that many hundreds and thousands of our people are being subjected to.
dennis fallon left an annotation (15 December 2011)
David,THANK YOU for the brief summary.Obviously you do not work for the state because your info addresses the question and is easy to understand.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





dennis fallon left an annotation ( 2 September 2011)
Link to this