CAFCASS scripting of psychological assessments

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please confirm or deny the following allegations by taking them
aboard in turn and answering with "YES" or "NO":

1. CAFCASS Guardian ad Litem and/or representative solicitors
instruct or otherwise coerce expert witnesses acting on instruction
from all parties, over what to write in their reports to the Family
Courts.

2. CAFCASS Guardian ad Litem wilfully misrepresents either by
policy or by choice, the wishes and feelings of the minors whom she
is charged to represent.

3. CAFCASS' unstated policy by formative and ongoing doctrine is in
line with CORAM's stated goal to reap profit by way of removing
minors unlawfully from their natural parents and placing them with
those wholly unsuited to raising children in any sort of
environment.

4. CAFCASS' unstated policy by formative and ongoing doctrine is to
commit serial perjury to meet the goal as stated in point #3.

5. CAFCASS' normal operating procedure, in collusion with Local
Authorities and Family Panel specialist legal practitioners, is in
line with Government stated policy to reach targets not to protect
children as is the public face of the organisation, but to create
and maintain profit at zero-return cost to every single Council Tax
payer in the country and the psychological and physical cost to
every parent and minor they succeed in separating.

6. CAFCASS' operations are not in line with normal advocacy
procedures of an ostensibly nonprofit-making advocacy service for
children, they are more in line with a profit-making service
industry at the beckon call of Local Authorities under a private
agreement to accelerate the process of removal for financial gain.

Yours faithfully,

James Moore