Follow this request
There are 5 people following this request
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this requestAct on what you've learnt
Similar requests
British government involvement in Youtube censorship
To Cabinet Office by John Walker 1 March 2009
British government involvement in Youtube censorship
To Department for Culture, Media and Sport by John Walker 2 March 2009
Home Office - reported to the Information Commissioner's Office
To Home Office by John Walker 14 October 2009
Compliance with Freedom of Information and Data Protection Acts
To Home Office by John Walker 30 October 2009
Leveson inquiry costs
To Home Office by John Walker 8 November 2011
Common Purpose courses, invoices and expenditure
To UK Border Agency by John Walker 8 November 2011
Jacqui Smith - training
To Home Office by John Walker 6 December 2008
Contracts with Corporation Service Company, Delaware
To Home Office by P. John 1 August 2009
Request A.C.M.D report from 1995, 'MP's interests in drinks industry'
To Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs by Thomas: Speed 28 June 2010
Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary Common Purpose
To Home Office by John Walker 18 June 2008
British government involvement in Youtube censorship
John Walker made this Freedom of Information request to Home Office
The request was partially successful.
From: John Walker
2 March 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
A friend of mine recently received the following email from
Youtube:
"The following video(s) from your account have been studied after a
complaint by a third party acting on behalf of the British
government. The inspection has been by the YouTube team under our
Community Guidelines:
* zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Your account has now received one Community Guidelines warning
strike, and you are suspended for a period of three Months from
uploading any new material onto the channel itself. Additional
violations will result in the disabling of your ability to post
coments to YouTube and the termination of your account forthwith.
It may interest you to note that after consultations with the
British authorities your own channel has now been branded "highly
distasteful", and therefore it will not now be possible to send
your videos to "Friends"."
Please supply:
1. a copy of the policy documents relating to government meddling
with Youtube content and your legal justification for interfering
with free speech;
2. the name of the government department that Youtube consults with
regarding these and other "distasteful" videos;
3. the name of the "third party acting on behalf of the British
government".
Yours faithfully,
John Walker
From: Oliver Paulette (IMS)
Home Office
2 April 2009
Dear Mr Walker
Please find attached correspondence concerning your recent request for
information under the Freedom of Information Act.
Regards
Paulette Oliver| Reviewer
Information Service Centre| Financial and Commercial Group
Lower Ground Floor| Seacole Building | Home Office | 2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
Tel: 020 7035 1032
Information on IMS services at:
[1]http://horizon/information_management/in... &
[2]http://horizon/library/index.asp
Enquiries on:
o information management to: [3][email address]
o record storage & handling helpdesk on 020 7035 1018/1019
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://horizon/information_management/in...
2. http://horizon/library/index.asp
3. mailto:[email address]
From: Oliver Paulette (IMS)
Home Office
15 April 2009
Please find attached the response to your FOI request of 2 March 2009.
Paulette Oliver| Reviewer
Information Service Centre| Financial and Commercial Group
Lower Ground Floor| Seacole Building | Home Office | 2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: John Walker
15 April 2009
Dear Oliver Paulette (IMS),
I request an internal review into this FOI because I feel that you
could try a little bit harder to answer the questions.
In your reply, you state: "officials have had general conversations
in the past with Google about Youtube content".
In light of this, please clarify my original questions as follows:
1. [original question] a copy of the policy documents relating to
government meddling with Youtube content and your legal
justification for interfering with free speech;[/original question]
Upon which of your department's policies were these "conversations"
made? Presumably these "conversations" were based on some
guidelines.
Have you had "conversations" with other website owners about their
content of their sites? Which websites? Is there a written record
of these conversations? If so, please supply.
2. [original question]the name of the government department that
Youtube consults with regarding these and other "distasteful"
videos;[/original question]
Please supply the name, rank/grade and job title of the person in
your department who handles these matters.
3. [original question]the name of the "third party acting on behalf
of the British government".[/original question]
I'm sure you could easily find out the identity of the "third
party". Perhaps the person in your department who liaises with
Youtube could ask them.
Yours sincerely,
John Walker
P Seurre left an annotation (15 April 2009)
Perhaps the question of who deals with such matters could be better directed at Youtube directly? Presumably they also have this information.
From: Pottinger Diana (IMS)
Home Office
27 April 2009
Mr Walker
please find attached an acknowledgement of your application for an
internal review of your FOIr equest
Diana Pottinger Information Access Consultant
Information Management Services, Shared Services Directorate
4th Floor, Seacole Building, Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
[1]www.homeoffice.gov.uk
Fax no: 0207 035 tbc
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/
From: John Walker
14 July 2009
Dear Pottinger Diana (IMS),
A response to this FOI request is well overdue. You should have
replied by now, and are breaking the law.
Please set up an internal review.
Yours sincerely,
John Walker
From: Pottinger Diana (IMS)
Home Office
10 August 2009
Diana Pottinger Information Access Consultant
Information Management Services, Shared Services Directorate
4th Floor, Seacole Building, Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
[1]www.homeoffice.gov.uk
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





P. John left an annotation ( 7 April 2009)
If this is true, the explanation for the UK Government curtailing freedom of speech had better be rock solid. I'd be very interested to learn what the justification is, and what the policy that applies might be.
Link to this