Follow this request

There are 3 people following this request

Offensive? Unsuitable?

Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).

If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators

Report this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

More similar requests

Event history details

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

Britain's child snatchers are a scandal - Telegraph

MS French (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Prime Minister’s Office

Prime Minister’s Office did not have the information requested.

From: MS French (Account suspended)

16 May 2010

Dear Prime Minister's Office,

Please provide how many complaints David Cameron has received in
connection with families complaining about forced adoption in his
Conservative run local authorities, both prior to after him
becoming Prime Minister.

And provide all information that relates to any provision being put
in place to reverse and prevent forced adoptions that are
completely out of control in all local authorities including
Conservative controlled councils.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/colum...

Britain's child snatchers are a scandal

The UK's system of forced adoption requires the Government's urgent
attention, says Christopher Booker

Is any human instinct more fundamental than the love of a mother
for her children? Last week I reported how Maureen Spalek from
Liverpool had been arrested and held in a cell for 24 hours for
sending a birthday card to her son, one of three children taken
away from her by a family court, despite its agreeing that she was
"an excellent mother".

In Runcorn magistrates' court on Wednesday Mrs Spalek was told she
must return for a pre-trial hearing, before her criminal charge of
sending a birthday card goes for trial at a Crown Court. Last
month, Mrs Spalek was one of 200 mothers who gathered in Stafford
to set up a group known as Child Snatching by the State. They were
addressed by Ian Josephs, a businessman based in Monaco, who has
championed the cause of parents whose children were unjustly
removed by social workers ever since he was a Tory county
councillor in the 1960s.

As Mr Josephs describes on his Forced Adoptions website, he has
dealt with hundreds of such harrowing cases (always being careful
to check that there was no evidence of physical or emotional harm
to the children). One is that of Sarah White, repeatedly arrested
for attempting to contact her "stolen children", including an
instance when she was jailed for a month for waving to her son when
she unexpectedly saw him across the street. Two weeks ago, she was
again held in custody for five hours, after her brother posted a
YouTube video describing her plight.

Julie Cipriani is another mother arrested for waving to her child
in the street and forbidden from further contact after reading out
in court her daughter's loving birthday card.

When another mother threatened with having her baby abducted
recently fled to Ireland, her family were repeatedly visited by
police, demanding to know her whereabouts. She is now receiving
much more humane treatment from Irish social services. (Britain is
almost the only country in Europe that permits forced adoptions
against the wishes of loving parents.)

In the Commons last October, the Tory MP Tim Yeo described a case
where Suffolk social workers waited until the father was out of the
house to snatch an 11-week-old baby from the arms of its distraught
mother, in order to put the child out for adoption. Until recently
social workers were set "adoption targets" by the government, as
part of a system where it seems they, the courts and the police are
too often conspiring to abduct children from loving parents in the
name of what amounts to heartless "social engineering". Few
scandals call for more urgent attention by our new Parliament than
this.

Yours faithfully,

E. French

Link to this

MS French (Account suspended) left an annotation (17 May 2010)

The Public and the Prime Minister may find this of interest, especially those that are parents or have families and seems to back up the concerns expressed/ reported in the Telegraph article.

Parents Beware

By Hugo Palmer

“Child snatching is being carried out by government agencies that have an interest in Adoption Agencies, Coram, BAAF and that take happy, healthy, young, bright children from innocent parents in the secret family courts. The court procedures are totally against the Human Rights of the parents and children in many ways, the trials are unfair, they are unjust punishment and torture, there is no right of free speech and no private family life.

“The government workers lie in order to stop contact between the parent and children in order to alienate the children from the parent. They stress the parent by making them watch the children’s mental health and security deteriorate while they are being alienated from the parents and have constant court proceedings.
“They then instruct a psychologist of their choice who will make the report that they want and will pay them many thousands for doing so. The psychologist will assess the parent and children while they are being alienated in order to find that the family is depressed wth attachment disorders.

“They make lots of false but serious allegations against the mother in contact sessions. The allege assault on the social worker, assault on the children, distress of the children if they cry because they don’t want you to leave.

“They don’t let you see the children or speak to them. During contact you are not allowed to take photos or video of the children, your children cannot speak to any friends or extended family. Contact will end if you use a mobile phone in anyway, show any sadness or distress, speak about the children coming home, speak about time frames, wider issues or anything that will give them any idea of why they can’t come home. Then they lie to the children telling them they can’t come home because their parent is ill, or dangerous or angry. If the children still want to come home and wont settle then they move the children to a new home and new school. They then lie to the new foster carer about why the children are in care and make out that the parent is crazy and abusive. The new foster carer can then help alienate the children from their parent.

“To get the children in the first place they go through every file they hold on you from every government agency imaginable. They ignore the majority of it because it is positive and pick out any minute details to make a report showing that you are failing to meet your children’s needs whether physical or emotional. They will note there are no stairgates (even though the children are too old to need them), they note a child having headlice, a child sometimes being low in mood, a child arriving at nursery in pyjamas, they route through your medical records to find if you ever took anti depressants and if you did for 2 weeks 7 years ago, they will make out that you have had mental health problems all your life and therefore you cannot meet the emotional needs of your children. They go through your criminal record and if you don’t have a criminal record they give you one by recording that your children had to be removed from you for their protection.

“The police assist them a lot. They regularly phone the police telling them that your children are in danger and so you constantly have police knocking on your door. Each time they do they make a report, what they saw when they were standing outside staring through your windows at the children, what state the house is in, how the family seemed, and report back to social services. If the police note nothing unusual then they just report that back and the Social Services put in their report – Police alerted that mother is suicidal and carried out a welfare check. They fail to mention that it was the social services that called the police.

“They respond to a parent who asks for help for stress by pushing them over their emotional edge by using lots of investigations and false reports in order to take the children and put them through court proceedings that 98% of the time end in adoption.
“The whole process puts the child in emotional turmoil and causes the children significant harm. Social Services don’t have any evidence so for the next 40 weeks while they keep the children from the mother, they get as much evidence as they can. They particularly like upsetting the mother by making serious but false allegations and lying in Court, making false reports and cancelling contact. They like to make so many rules about contact that it is impossible to follow them without giving your child the impression that you are so much happier that they are not with you and you are happy to only see them 1 hr a week. You will also be happy that they will be adopted. It is impossible.

“They cancel contact for the parent not following the rules and tell the child ‘If she loved you she would follow the rules. She mustn’t really want to see you.’ The child then shows feelings of anger and rejection and you never get the chance to tell the child the truth of what is going on so that they know you aren’t rejecting them and that you are fighting for them but they were stolen by agencies with interest in adoption.
“The social services never help you stay together as a family and don’t make any plans to rehabilitate the children to you. They cut off all contact to anyone that might want to take the child and then say that they can’t have the children because there is no real bond. They will fail their 3 day inspection of any family member that wants to get involved unless it is a family member that doesn’t like you and wants to also alienate you from your children. They often find this easy because they target parents that were once in care or that don’t have good family support.
“When the children are in care they are often taken to Luxurious venues in the middle of the night. Judges, Lawyers, doctors also attend the same venues at the same time. The children then arrive at contact with bruising around their crotch areas and evidence of serious sexual abuse. If your child has bee in care long enough then they cannot blame it on you but otherwise they will. (In my case there is no evidence of sexual abuse, yet!) Even if you prove that your child was sexually abused in care they will not return the children to your care. They will put a gagging order on you to protect the foster carer and paedophiles.

“The Judges comply with the government agencies by not considering the parents evidence and just rely on the fact that the government agencies have raised a concern by using hearsay evidence and therefore it could possibly true, whereas if the mother’s story could possibly be true the government agency wins on the weighted balance of probability. The mother has to have firm evidence to prove that the government agencies’ allegations are false and this is normally impossible to get because the allegations arise while the child is in care when you are not allowed to speak to or see the child.

“The lawyers that are supposed to represent you behave as a paper forwarding exercise. They will tell you to admit things you haven’t done by saying ‘if you don’t say that then the children will be adopted’. They tell you that you have no right to appeal or to see a barrister. The barrister will even stop you saying that your children were snatched illegally even if they were! The solicitors have adversarial meetings which you are excluded from where they discuss where your case is going and how they are going to help each other get it there.

“What is going on in this country is sinister and this needs addressing urgently.”

http://thelostpacket.wordpress.com/2010/...

Quiet Demonstration – Stop the State Stealing Children

At: The Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand (OK 10 Fleet Street), London

On: Thursday 20 May 2010
Time: 1000-1700

Link to this

Prime Minister’s Office

15 June 2010


Attachment image.pdf
118K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr French,

Please see attached response.

Kind regards,

Yasmine Edwards

FOI Team

Cabinet Office

Tel: 020 7276 2473

The Cabinet Office computer systems may be monitored and communications
carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system
and for other lawful purposes.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

LS Palmer (Account suspended) left an annotation (29 November 2010)

http://www.mediafire.com/?igb0f758y7ed677

Download a real life case study on how children are kinapped by CAFCASS through the secret family courts.

Link to this

Oxana Bondar left an annotation (22 January 2011)

"The child then shows feelings of anger and rejection and you never get the chance to tell the child the truth of what is going on so that they know you aren’t rejecting them and that you are fighting for them but they were stolen by agencies with interest in adoption. "

I have always been discussing the SS matter with my son, from the day one. My son was shocked. He was little only 7 years old but when the case reached culmination he turned 9 and he grew hating the SS for what they were doing, he grew up being fully aware of what sS were capable of.
I was researching a lot at home together with my son. He found the stuff gripping. We used to wantch posts on You Tube togather all dedicated to child protection snatching kids from loving families and read many anarticle together before deciding that my son had to go and live abroad in a boarding school as tis would be much safer for him. Infact it was his choice. He chose to live in a boarding school instead of being raped at a care home or drug tested or sold into slavery by the UK child snatching nazis.

People, talk to your kids! It is best to be prepared than taken by surprise. Dont let them mess with your kids' heads.
What SS are doing is a crime against humanity. Our children should know so they can grow into the world being better prepared to fight the bastards.

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Prime Minister’s Office only: