Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Childrens Contact Centres
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Mr Russell (Account suspended) 4 October 2009
Buses using Rooker Rise
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Trevor R Nunn 29 July 2009
Education Counsellors Supporting Pupils in Education Information
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by C McEwan 5 June 2009
Unadopted roads
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Trevor R Nunn 16 June 2009
Declaration of affiliation or interest / external investigation
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Paul Cardin 18 August 2009
Details of Empty Commercial Properties
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Natalie Davis 11 May 2009
Parking - Penalty Charge Notices in Neston and Parkgate
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Ryan Miller 13 July 2009
PUBLIC CAR PARKING
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by John H Hutchinson 4 August 2009
elective home education - suitable education
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Tania Berlow 6 August 2009
in depth questionnaire- elective home education
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Tania Berlow 29 August 2009
Breaching the 20 day FOI deadline.
T Thomas made this Freedom of Information request to Cheshire West and Chester Council
The request was successful.
From: T Thomas
16 July 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Since the inception of Cheshire West and Chester Council
1) how many requests for information under the freedom of
information act has the council received?
2) how many have times has the council failed to respond within the
statutory 20 day period?
Yours faithfully,
T Thomas
From: CHALMERS, Iris (PA to Chief Executive)
Cheshire West and Chester Council
17 July 2009
Dear Mr Thomas
Thank you for your email. It will be treated as a request within the
meaning of the Act: this means that we will send you a full response
within 20 working days, either supplying you with the information which
you want, or explaining to you why we cannot supply it. If we need any
further clarification or there is any problem we will be in touch.
In the meantime if you wish to discuss this further please contact me. It
would be helpful if you could quote the log number 400134.
Kind regards
Iris Chalmers
PA to Steve Robinson, Chief Executive
Cheshire West and Chester Council
Tel: 01244 975968
Email: [email address]
Location: Room 283, County Hall, Chester CH1 1SF
Visit: cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk
show quoted sections
From: CHALMERS, Iris (PA to Chief Executive)
Cheshire West and Chester Council
21 July 2009
Dear Mr Thomas
Thank you for your email. It will be treated as a request within the
meaning of the Act: this means that we will send you a full response
within 20 working days, either supplying you with the information which
you want, or explaining to you why we cannot supply it. If we need any
further clarification or there is any problem we will be in touch.
In the meantime if you wish to discuss this further please contact me. It
would be helpful if you could quote the log number 400134.
Iris Chalmers
PA to Steve Robinson, Chief Executive
Cheshire West and Chester Council
Tel: 01244 975968
Email: [email address]
Location: Room 283, County Hall, Chester CH1 1SF
Visit: cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk
show quoted sections
From: CHALMERS, Iris (PA to Chief Executive)
Cheshire West and Chester Council
13 August 2009
Dear Mr Thomas
Thank you for you recent request for information on FOI requests received.
Before providing the figures I would like to provide some background on
the new authority and present some additional information which will give
a better picture for the figures describe below.
As you may be aware on 1st April 2009 the seven council authorities in the
Cheshire area were abolished and two new unitary authorities came into
being; Cheshire West and Chester is the amalgamation of Chester City
Council, Ellesmere Port and Neston Borough Council and Vale Royal Borough
Council, Cheshire East is the amalgamation of Crewe & Nantwich Borough
Council, Congleton Borough Council and Macclesfield Borough Council.
In light of this there have been substantial staffing and process changes
with ongoing centralisation of tasks. This has resulted in a small period
of time where responses were not always responded to within a timely
fashion. The organisation has now put in place an appropriate process to
make sure all requests are captured, recorded, assigned and dealt with
under the terms of Freedom of Information legislation. In addition the
new organisation recognises the importance of making sure requests are
dealt with within relevant timescales.
The figures for Cheshire West and Chester can be broken down as follows :
2^nd April to 17^th June
88 requests received, 55 not answered within 20 days (69%)
17^th June to 12^th August
108 requests received 15 not answered within 20 days (14%)
Should you require any further information or assistance please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Iris Chalmers
PA to Steve Robinson, Chief Executive
Cheshire West and Chester Council
Tel: 01244 975968
Email: [email address]
Location: Room 283, County Hall, Chester CH1 1SF
Visit: cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk
show quoted sections
T Thomas left an annotation (13 August 2009)
So the answer to my question is 196 freedom of information requests received. Whilst 70 (over a third) not being answered within the legal 20 day deadline.
I wonder if this council would accept the excuse, 'I have been busy reorganising my house' as an excuse for a local resident breaking the law? I somehow doubt it!
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (16 July 2009)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/vale_...
It would appear that this new council is no better than the old borough councils as far as working within legal guidelines are concerned. The above borough council even promised the ICO they would improve but didn't. Wonder if the same staff are involved? If they are it would explain the problem.
Link to this