Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Due Diligence and Suppliers of Student Lifecycle Project
To University of Glasgow by James Watson 30 October 2009
Cost of due diligence for the Student System
To University of Glasgow by James Watson 26 August 2009
Structure of Student Lifecycle Project
To University of Glasgow by James Watson 27 May 2009
Excessive due diligence cost of student lifecycle project
To University of Glasgow by James Watson 25 January 2010
Vendor selection for the Student Lifecycle Project
To University of Glasgow by Robert Clark 7 September 2009
Principal and Student Lifecycle Project
To University of Glasgow by Louis Seaman 25 January 2011
Cost and viability of the Student Lifecycle Project
To University of Glasgow by Wolfram Bayer 3 December 2009
Suitability of of Campus Solutions - Student Lifecycle Project
To University of Glasgow by John Ferguson 22 June 2011
Working practices for Student Lifecycle project
To University of Glasgow by James Watson 28 April 2009
Suppliers vs Student Lifecycle Project
To University of Glasgow by James Watson 2 November 2010
Background information about the Student Lifecycle Project
James Watson made this Freedom of Information request to University of Glasgow
The request was partially successful.
From: James Watson
30 September 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
1. Appendix C (Phase 1 - Estimated Costs) of "Review of Student
Administrative Processes" that was submitted to the Senior
Management Group - Tuesday 26 June 2007 provides an itemised budget
request for phase 1 of the Student Lifecycle Project. Could you
please provide the actual spent against each item listed in
Appendix C?
2. Could you please provide me with a breakdown of the cost of the
due diligence phase (i.e. £293,982)? In this breakdown all I need
is who was paid, how much they were paid, and for what purpose?
3. Your estimated cost for phase 1 of the student lifecycle project
was £653,600 (as described in Appendix C of "Review of Student
Administrative Processes" ). However, in replying to another FoI
request (
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/12...
) you stated that the actual cost was in the region of £801,655.
Could you please tell me who approved the additional funds? I also
wish to see all relevant proposals that were produced, and minutes
of all meetings that were held to discuss or approve the additional
funds.
4. On page 10 of "Review of Student Administrative Processes"
document that was submitted to the Senior Management Group -
Tuesday 26 June 2007 there is a mention of two independent
consultants visiting the University. Could you please tell me how
much each was paid and who approved the expenditure?
5. According to the high-level plan (see page 11 of the above
document) the target completion date for Phase 1 was Aug 08. Was
this achieved? If not when was this phase completed? If this phase
was not completed on time what were the reasons?
Yours faithfully,
James Watson
From: FOI Office
University of Glasgow
1 October 2009
Dear Mr Watson,
Further to your Freedom of Information request dated 30 September 2009
timed 12:39 hours. Please find letter of acknowledgement attached.
You will find that the University's acknowledgement of your information
request is in PDF (Portable Document Format) file(s) attached to this
email.
The PDF file format is used for electronic distribution because it
preserves the look and feel of the original document complete with
fonts, colours, images, and layout. To open a PDF file you can download
a free program called Acrobat Reader and install it onto your computer
by clicking on to the following URL:
http://www.adobe.co.uk/products/acrobat/...
Yours sincerely,
Data Protection and Freedom of Information Office
Direct Line: +44 (0)141 330 2523
Fax: 0141 330 4920
Gilbert Scott Building
University of Glasgow
University Avenue
Glasgow G12 8QQ
G12 8QQ
The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
From: FOI Office
University of Glasgow
28 October 2009
Dear Mr Watson,
Please find attached the University's response to your Freedom of
Information (Scotland) Act 2002 request dated 30 September 2009 timed
12:39 hours.
You will find that the University's response to your information request
is in PDF (Portable Document Format) file(s) attached to this email.
The PDF file format is used for electronic distribution because it
preserves the look and feel of the original document complete with
fonts, colours, images, and layout. To open a PDF file you can download
a free program called Acrobat Reader and install it onto your computer
by clicking on to the following URL:
http://www.adobe.co.uk/products/acrobat/...
Yours sincerely,
Data Protection and Freedom of Information Office
Direct Line: +44 (0)141 330 2523
Fax: 0141 330 4920
Gilbert Scott Building
University of Glasgow
University Avenue
Glasgow G12 8QQ
G12 8QQ
The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
From: James Watson
30 October 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of University of
Glasgow's handling of my FOI request 'Background information about
the Student Lifecycle Project'.
Your response to my FoI request is inconsistent with the
information you provided me in you review of one of my previous
requests, please see:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/17...
In response to that request for review you stated:
“With respect to approval of the expenditure, the University’s
Senior Management Group (SMG) approved a budget of £653.6k for
Phase I of the Student Lifecycle Project: Phase I encompassed that
part of the project prior to the contract with the supplier being
signed i.e. including the due diligence. The level of spend is
clearly within the budget allocated.”
Based on this reply, Phase I encompassed the due diligence. I
therefore do not believe that your reply “Phase I was concluded at
the end of August 2008 …” is the answer to my question 5, i.e.
“According to the high-level plan (see page 11 of the above
document) the target completion date for Phase 1 was Aug 08. Was
this achieved? If not when was this phase completed? If this phase
was not completed on time what were the reasons?”
In light of this please review your answer.
You do not answer my 1st question either. Based on the information
you have so far provided to me I know that many facts have been
omitted, for example the cost of due diligence.
Again, I would like you to check your figures and provide me with
an accurate response.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ba...
Yours faithfully,
James Watson
From: FOI Office
University of Glasgow
10 November 2009
Dear Mr Watson,
Further to your Freedom of Information Request for a Review dated 30
October 2009 timed 14:55 hours. Please find letter of acknowledgement
attached.
You will find that the University's acknowledgement of your Request for
a Review is in PDF (Portable Document Format) file(s) attached to this
email.
The PDF file format is used for electronic distribution because it
preserves the look and feel of the original document complete with
fonts, colours, images, and layout. To open a PDF file you can download
a free program called Acrobat Reader and install it onto your computer
by clicking on to the following URL:
http://www.adobe.co.uk/products/acrobat/...
Yours sincerely,
Data Protection and Freedom of Information Office
Direct Line: +44 (0)141 330 2523
Fax: 0141 330 4920
Gilbert Scott Building
University of Glasgow
University Avenue
Glasgow G12 8QQ
G12 8QQ
The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
From: FOI Reviews
University of Glasgow
26 November 2009
Please find attached the University's response to your request for a
review.
<<FoI 2009-184F0076448.pdf>>
Wolfram Bayer left an annotation ( 1 December 2009)
There are a number of inconsistencies in the University's reply for example:
The University had already told us in a previous response that the actual cost of Phase I was £801,655. In the original response to this request the cost was apparently £218,144.24. The review of this FOI request revealed a figure of £808,017.93.
The University's reply to question 5 is again evasive. They had already told us that "Phase I encompassed that part of the project prior to the contract with the supplier being signed i.e. including the due diligence." Why did the University not admit to Phase I being delayed and give the reasons for this delay. What are they trying to hide?
The University should respect the FOI Act and not provide the public with vague, ambiguous and inconsistent replies. Is this befitting of a University that wishes to become one of the top UK Universities?
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Helen Paterson left an annotation ( 1 November 2009)
In your request for the internal review of this FoI request you have expressed your dissatisfaction with their answers to your 1st and 4th questions.
Please note that they have not answered your 3rd question either.
Helen
Link to this