Follow this request

There is 1 person following this request

Offensive? Unsuitable?

Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).

If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators

Report this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

More similar requests

Event history details

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

Authorship of Published Report on CNZS

Paul Burns made this Freedom of Information request to Birkbeck, University of London

The request was partially successful.

From: Paul Burns

25 May 2010

Dear Birkbeck, University of London,

In April of this year, Birkbeck issued a press release concerning a
Review Report following the closure of the Centre for New Zealand
Studies.

The press release states that the report was “presented by
Professor Janet Wilson and Professor Andrew Sharp”. It also says,
“As part of their review, they worked with the College, the New
Zealand High Commission and the Vice-Chancellor of the University
of London, Sir Graeme Davies. They also consulted scholars and
academics both in the United Kingdom and New Zealand, as well as
New Zealand social and professional groups.”

The report begins with the heading “Review of the Centre for New
Zealand Studies by Professors Janet Wilson and Andrew Sharp".
However, there is nothing that asserts the review as published was
entirely the work of these two professors.

It is also puzzling that the pdf copy of the report (CNZS Review
Report April 2010 pdf (2).pdf) contains under the file’s properties
a New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade email address
(lonp17"at"mfat.govt.nz)

This suggests that the report was concluded on New Zealand
government computer and that an MFAT employee made a pdf file and
forwarded it to Birkbeck for release.

I therefore request to see the copy of the Review Report as
submitted by Professors Wilson and Sharpe before any editing by
others (including MFAT / Zealand High Commission, Birkbeck and the
University of London) took place.

I further request:

•Copies of email or other correspondence that disclose or concern
which people commented on, contributed to, or otherwise amended the
report submitted by Professors Wilson and Sharpe before it was
published.

•Copies of any emails or other correspondence from Professors
Wilson and Sharpe giving their endorsement to the version that was
to be published, or any other comments they made on the final
version.

•Copies of submissions made to the review by organisations.

Yours faithfully

Paul Burns

Link to this

From: Paul Burns

24 June 2010

Dear Birkbeck, University of London,

I have had no response to my FOI request made on 25 May via
whatdotheyknow.com concerning Authorship of the Review Report on
the Centre for New Zealand
Studies.

By law, Birkbeck should have responded by 23 June.

Please confirm that you are aware of the request and advise on when
the substantive reply will be made.

Yours faithfully,

Paul Burns

Link to this

From: Katharine Bock
Birkbeck, University of London

24 June 2010


Attachment CNZS Paul Burns June 10.pdf
18.1M Download View as HTML


Dear Paul Burns

Thank you for your email.

Please find attached a response to your query as follows:

I therefore request to see the copy of the Review Report as
submitted by Professors Wilson and Sharpe before any editing by
others (including MFAT / Zealand High Commission, Birkbeck and the
University of London) took place.

This information is ncluded in the attached document

I further request:

•Copies of email or other correspondence that disclose or concern
which people commented on, contributed to, or otherwise amended the
report submitted by Professors Wilson and Sharpe before it was
published.

This information is included in the attached document

•Copies of any emails or other correspondence from Professors
Wilson and Sharpe giving their endorsement to the version that was
to be published, or any other comments they made on the final
version.

This information is included in the attached document

•Copies of submissions made to the review by organisations.

We have no such information on file at Birkbeck.

Please note that the attached document constitutes all the information that Birkbeck has on file in relation to your request. As you will note, some sections have been redacted for the following reasons

1 Information not pertaining to your request

2 Information exempt from disclosure under the freedom of information Act for the following reasons

Section 36 Prejudice to effective conduct of public affairs

(Information that would, or would be likely to, inhibit—
(i) the free and frank provision of advice, or
(ii) the free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation, or
(c) would otherwise prejudice, or would be likely otherwise to prejudice, the effective conduct of public affairs.)
This relates to ongoing discussions not yet concluded between Birkbeck and the New Zealand High Commission on the nature of the future Centre for New Zealand Studies

Section 40 Personal information

Section 43 Commercial interests
(Information if its disclosure under this Act would, or would be likely to, prejudice the commercial interests of any person (including the public authority holding it).
As above, this relates to ongoing discussions not yet concluded between Birkbeck and the New Zealand High Commission on the nature of the future Centre for New Zealand Studies

I apologise that this information has been released to you a day late. This was due to a clerical error.

Yours sincerely

Katharine Bock

Freedom of Information Officer
Birkbeck, University of London

show quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Birkbeck, University of London only: