Follow this request

There is 1 person following this request

Offensive? Unsuitable?

Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).

If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators

Report this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

More similar requests

Event history details

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

April 2010 Overseas Registration Exam (ORE) Part 2

D Affaarka made this Freedom of Information request to General Dental Council

The request was partially successful.

From: D Affaarka

23 June 2010

Dear General Dental Council,

Questions 1-3 all relate to the April 2010 ORE part 2 diet exam:

1. How many appeals were there for this exam and how many appeals
were upheld?

2. On what grounds were the appeal(s) upheld and what was the
outcome for the candidate(s)?

3. With respect to the Blood Pressure OSCE station 13 and Mounting
Radiographs OSCE station 9:

a. Please confirm the exact number of candidates who each sat these
two OSCES

b. What was the required pass mark was for each of the two OSCEs
(both simple mark and normalised mark)

c. Please list the marks of all candidates who sat these two OSCEs
(if this is not possible please explain why and instead provide the
mean, mode and median pass marks) as simple mark prior to any
normalisation and post normalisation.

4. Please define what constitutes a "borderline mark failure" and
explain how the adjustment of marks for "normalisation" is
conducted.

The release of any of this information (especially all marks for Q.
4) does not breach any data protection laws as no personal
identifiable information is being requested. Rather this request is
no different to general statistical information provided by the GDC
as part of the “ORE results summary” on the GDC website. I trust
that this information should therefore be readily and easily
available and I thank you in advance for aiming to provide this
within the prescribed time limits from today.

Yours faithfully,

Mr Affaarka

Link to this

From: Freedom of Information Requests
General Dental Council

23 June 2010

Thank you for your message which has been received by the Freedom of
Information (FOI) e mail in box.

Your message is not being automatically forwarded but messages are picked
up each working day and forwarded to the relevant team for attention. We
may not acknowledge your query separately but in accordance with the
Freedom of Information Act you will receive a response to any FOI query
within 20 working days, the first day being the working day following our
receipt of your query. Any query under the Data Protection Act will be
answered within the 40 days allowed by that Act. In either case we will
respond as soon as possible.

Any query which may have been sent to this e mail address which does not
relate to FOI or Data Protection will also be forwarded to the relevant
team for response. We aim to respond to general queries within ten working
days.

Thank you for contacting the General Dental Council.

If you have received this email in error please read on:

The material transmitted in this email and attachments is intended only for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the message contains information relating to a third party apparently included in error, please do not review, re transmit, share, disclose, print, store or take any action in reliance on its contents in any way whatsoever.

If you receive this email in error, please contact the sender on telephone number 020 7887 3800, delete the material from any computer and destroy any copies made, alternatively email mailto:[email address]

Communications transmitted over the Internet are not always secure. The process of transmission may have infected the message and its contents with a computer virus or other malware. The General Dental Council will not accept any responsibility whatsoever for damage caused to the recipient's computer systems when the message or contents are opened.

SUPPLIERS: For important changes to the General Dental Council*s ordering arrangements, please consult the suppliers page on the GDC website at this address - http://www.gdc-uk.org/Partner+organisati...

Link to this

From: Jenny Cowan (020 7344 3701)
General Dental Council

16 July 2010

Dear Mr Affaarka,

Freedom of information request - April 2010 Overseas Registration Exam
(ORE) Part 2

I am writing to respond to your questions concerning the April 2010 ORE
Part 2 exam.

1) You asked how many appeals there were there for this exam and how many

appeals were upheld.

Answer:

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Number of complaints on the grounds of serious defects |1 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------+----------|
|Number of complaints on the grounds of serious defects upheld|0 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Please note: the GDC does not accept applications for appeal against ORE
results.

2) You asked about the grounds on which the appeal(s) were upheld and the
outcome for the candidate(s).

Answer:

No appeals were upheld.

3) With respect to the Blood Pressure OSCE station 13 and Mounting

Radiographs OSCE station 9:

a. You asked us to confirm the number of candidates who each sat
each of these two stations.

Answers:

Numbers sitting Station 9

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|No. on Day 1 |40 |
|------------------------------------------+-----------------------------|
|No. on Day 2 |59 |
|------------------------------------------+-----------------------------|
|Total No sitting Station 9 in Pt 2 OSCE |99 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Numbers sitting Station 13

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|No. on Day 1 |40 |
|------------------------------------------+-----------------------------|
|No. on Day 2 |59 |
|------------------------------------------+-----------------------------|
|Total No sitting Station 13 in Pt 2 OSCE |99 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

b. You asked about the required pass mark for each of the two OSCEs

(both simple mark and normalised mark) or each of the two OSCEs

Answers:

Please see the tables below. Please note that the GDC does not normalise
marks for individual OSCE stations. Marks are converted to percentages to
ensure that each assessed station carries equal weight.

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |Simple pass mark |Pass mark as a percentage |
|---------------------+---------------------+----------------------------|
|Station 9 Day 1 |13/17 |76% |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |Simple pass mark |Pass mark as a percentage |
|---------------------+---------------------+----------------------------|
|Station 9 Day 2 |13/17 |76% |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |Simple pass mark |Pass mark as a percentage |
|---------------------+---------------------+----------------------------|
|Station 13 Day 1 |12/20 |60% |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |Simple pass mark |Pass mark as a percentage |
|---------------------+---------------------+----------------------------|
|Station 13 Day 2 |12/20 |60% |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

c. You asked us to list the marks of all candidates who sat these
two OSCEs as simple mark prior to any normalisation and post
normalisation.

Answer:

The marks of other candidates would amount to their personal data. We
cannot provide you with the personal data of any other candidate as this
could constitute an infringement of the Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998.

I would refer you to a folder called [1]ORE Part 2 April 2010 results at
the [2]www.gdc-uk.org / The Overseas Registration Exam (ORE) / ORE results
page of the General Dental Council website. This may provide some of the
information you are seeking. If this is not sufficient for you, please
give me more information about what you require, and we will assess
whether there is any further public information we are able to provide.

4) You asked us to define what constitutes a `borderline mark failure' and
explain how

the adjustment of marks for `normalisation' is conducted.

Your attention is drawn to the ORE Part 2 OSCE Exercise Guidance at the
[3]www.gdc-uk.org / The Overseas Registration Exam (ORE) / ORE Guidance
webpage, in particular to the `Marking' section.

Following the exam examiners will discuss borderline candidates'
performance before agreeing their results. Marks just below the agreed
pass mark are described as being `borderline'

I refer you to my comments in 3b above concerning normalisation.

I hope that these answers are helpful to you.

Yours sincerely,

Jenny Cowan

Exam Development Lead (Interim)

General Dental Council

Tel: +44 (0)20 7344 3701

Fax: +44 (0)20 7487 2643

Email: [4][email address]

Web: [5]www.gdc-uk.org

GDC | Protecting patients, regulating the dental team

If you have received this email in error please read on:

The material transmitted in this email and attachments is intended only
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed and may contain
confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the message contains information relating to a third party
apparently included in error, please do not review, re transmit, share,
disclose, print, store or take any action in reliance on its contents in
any way whatsoever.

If you receive this email in error, please contact the sender on
telephone number 020 7887 3800, delete the material from any computer
and destroy any copies made, alternatively email
mailto:[email address]

Communications transmitted over the Internet are not always secure. The
process of transmission may have infected the message and its contents
with a computer virus or other malware. The General Dental Council will
not accept any responsibility whatsoever for damage caused to the
recipient's computer systems when the message or contents are opened.

SUPPLIERS: For important changes to the General Dental Council*s
ordering arrangements, please consult the suppliers page on the GDC
website at this address -
http://www.gdc-uk.org/Partner+organisati...

References

Visible links
1. Document opens in new window
http://www.gdc-uk.org/NR/rdonlyres/DE466...
2. http://www.gdc-uk.org/
3. http://www.gdc-uk.org/
4. mailto:[email address]
blocked::mailto:[email address]
mailto:[email address]
mailto:[email address]
5. http://www.gdc-uk.org/
http://www.gdc-uk.org/

Link to this

Sunnyd left an annotation (18 September 2011)

With reference to the OSCE part of ORE exam part 2: If the equipment or materials are faulty for the ORE exam part 2 practical Osce's what are the appeal procedures provided by the GDC?

Is there a process during the exam for the examiners to note defects or faults in equipment or materials if experienced or complained about? What is the procedure if a candidate clearly has faulty equipment and does not complain during the exam due to fear/intimidation or nerves? Does the examiner intervene if it is clearly faulty? And if the candidate does complain during the exam what is the procedure? After the exam if the candidate fails due to faulty equipment or materials is their any compensation or
reconsideration?
Why are there no past papers or clear cut syllabus for candidates wishing to sit the ORE exams?
If a candidate fails on one of four parts of the exam with each part
being sat separately, why must the candidate resit the whole exam if this is not standard practice at UK universities and the ORE part 2
is a reflection of the standard set at final undergraduate level at
universities?
Why is the pass rate for the ORE exam part 2 around 12%
If the candidate fails the osce'S part due to faulty equipment and no other parts of the exam is failed is there any grievance procedure or appeal procedure that is fair?

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
General Dental Council only: