Application of Adjudication for Justice

Now that's what I like, nice simple, "easy to answer" questions.... So what is going to be your excuse for not answering this one ?? Not recorded information, perhaps? Research and retrieval will take you over the restricted limit on man hours, maybe? There's an "R" in the month? OR perhaps plain and simple "If we answer this we are going to really drop ourselves in the sh!t??"

How about sticking to the "hard" questions being asked of you, cos let's face it all the "easy" questions being posed just recently are definitely making Her Majesty's Department's a little hot under the collar, wouldn't you say?

I fail to see how this falls under an FOI request.

"I fail to see how this falls under an FOI request."

Does that answer my question, then?

Or are you yet another of these self-appointed "Guardians of the Freedom of Information Act" (because - presumably - HMCS are too small, weak, and timid so as to be able to guard themselves)?

Stephen Cordes ... your profile here shows that you created a Registration specifically to be able to post the fact that you "fail to see". Did we need to know that? Was announcing your myopia to the world worth all the trouble?

Judging by HMCS swift response here, it is obvious that this thread is causing "issues". It has certainly created an "issue" for Stephen Cordes, too, by the looks of things!

Perhaps a little re-wording may simplify things for those that have "issues".

For the court system to operate the way it does there must be "Rools", and in order for adjudication to be uniform across the board those "rools" must be recorded somewhere - written down so that the same practice can be applied universally, as it is in all courts across the UK.

On that basis please provide the written "Rools" ( or a link to the info) that allows HMCS to operate its courts in the manner it does.

Precisely, where does it say that that the level of bias highlighted in the OP's request is acceptable practice.

We know it is COMMON practice, but where does it say, in the "rools" that is it ACCEPTABLE - that is LAWFUL - practice......... you see as far as the research that i have done goes, I cannot find anything that explains the tilted playing field.... perhaps i am looking in the wrong places?

Myopic Stephen "Fail to see" Cordes has missed the most fundamental point, which is that HMCS should have told me that this request is invalid (if they thought so) within 20 days (by their own rools). And they haven't even had the guts to do that.

"Doesn't compute! Doesn't compute! Doesn't compute! Not Programmed! Response not in Templates!".

And that's a fundamental point. If the response is not in the Templates, and/or not on the Database, a simple, direct, reasonable, realistic question (from a little old lady in Middlesex, namely me) cannot (apparently) be answered.

Does this explain anything about the system under which we live?

Does this explain why WhatDoTheyKnow is such a beneficial facility? How else is one expected to get these essential aspects across?

In response to Veronica and others who have publically abused me after stating the obvious, I shall take your points in turn:

1) No it does not answer your question. I am merely pointing out that your original request doesn't appear to be set out as a Freedom of Information request.

2) No I am not a self-appointed "Guardians of the Freedom of Information Act" (because - presumably - HMCS are too small, weak, and timid so as to be able to guard themselves)?

I am a normal, hard working tax-payer.

3) My profile was created ages ago, so I could track requests like this and either find out some useful information, or laugh/cry/look in amazement at the abuse you seem to give out to people.

4) I think you may have missed the fundamental point in that HMCS have better things to do - like respond to properly worded, and sensible FOI requests.

Stephen "Fail to See" Cordes.

As Stephen Cordes says, this is again clearly not a request for information and therefore inappropriate for the FOI and this website.

It is a mystery why you think this activity is a performing any valuable purpose. (It is also a mystery why you insist on verbally abusing anyone who does nothing more than point out that your requests are not answerable under the FOIA.)

The nerve of those who clearly have not given any attention to research, and have the audacity to question one who clearly has thouroughly investigated. Veronica you are a champion. I totally respect your tireless attempts to reach out and help your fellow man.there is nothing wrong with your request, it would appear that your counterparts on here are totally out of the loop with regard to interlect knowledge and more importantly manners. I cannot understand their mentality at all. I cannot comprehend why they cannot just answer your question, unless of course they want to hide the fact that no justice is ever obtainable in a magistrates administrative court, where Oaths of office are not even adhered to. Kangaroo comes to mind.