Aiding and Abetting Unlawful Warrants.

Dear Ms Pears

Thank you for your e-mail of 5 December 2011 in which you ask the United Kingdom Supreme Court (UKSC) for the following information -

"1) Can you tell me and my associates, why the <Coventry City
Council> are aiding and abetting Unlawful Warrants, to forcibly
enter Private Properties, which are being signed and passed by the
<Coventry Magistrates Courts> ?

2) The <Coventry Magistrates Courts> are signing Warrants Under
Section 135 (1) of the Mental Health Act, To Search For And Remove
Patient, where;
A) A person has NO HISTORY of any Mental Health and is NOT a
patient, AND
B) A person is UNKNOWN to any Mental Health employees, AND
C) A persons GP has NO INVOLVEMENT, AND
D) A person is NOT a risk to the Public or Themselves, AND
E) False Information is being passed and shared, without the
person's knowledge or consent, AND
F) NO FAMILY MEMBERS are notified, AND
G) NO measures are placed to PROTECT PROPERTY, AND,
H) NO measures are placed to PROTECT PETS,
I) NO FIRE PREVENTION measures are put in place, AND
J) NO SECURITY OF PROPERTY is put in place, AND
K) There is NO Police involvement.
Can you tell me and my associates, EXACTLY which LAW is used in
order for the <Coventry Magistrates Courts Judges> to take these
actions, including the signing of Warrants, under the principles of
questions 1 AND 2. We await your timely response, including under
the "Public Interest Disclosure ACT 1998". In addition, it is
PROVEN that the Warrants have been obtained to Forcibly gain entry
into Private Homes in the hours of Darkness, including as late as
9.40pm."

Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).

The Freedom of Information Act can only be used to access recorded information. It cannot be used to solicit advice or opinion. Your questions appear to be seeking legal advice or opinion, and I am unable to deal with these queries under the terms of FOIA. You may like to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau to see if they are able to help you with these questions.

I should also explain that the Coventry Magistrates court is part of Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS), which is an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. The UKSC is not a part of HMCTS and would not hold any details of cases heard in the Coventry Magistrates court, unless that case was subsequently referred to the UKSC.

If you are seeking recorded information held by HMCTS you can address your query to the Ministry of Justice at the following address -

Data Access & Compliance Unit
Ministry of Justice
6th Floor
102 Petty France
London. SW1H 9AJ

As part of our obligations under the FOIA, the UK Supreme Court has an independent review process. If you are dissatisfied with this decision, you may write to request an internal review. The internal review will be carried out by someone who did not make the original decision, and they will re-assess how the Department handled the original request.

If you wish to request an internal review, please write or send an email to the following address:

William Arnold
Director of Corporate Services
UK Supreme Court
Parliament Square
London
SW1P 3BD
e-mail: [email address]

If you remain dissatisfied after an internal review decision, you have the right to apply to the Information Commissioner's Office under Section 50 of the FOIA. You can contact the Information Commissioner's Office at the following address:

Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF

Internet: https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us...

Yours sincerely

Paul Brigland
Departmental Records Officer
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
Parliament Square
London. SW1P 3BD
DX157230 Parliament Square 4

[email address]
Tel: 0207 960 1983
Fax: 0207 960 1901

show quoted sections