Make and explore Freedom of Information requests
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this requestAct on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Agreements
To Cheshire County Council by Trevor R Nunn 13 October 2008
Status of open space adjacent to Firtree Close, Winsford
To Vale Royal Borough Council by Trevor R Nunn 13 August 2008
Verge cutting on an adopted highway/unadopted road.
To Vale Royal Borough Council by Trevor R Nunn 16 September 2008
Status of play area opposite Linwood, Winsford
To Vale Royal Borough Council by Trevor R Nunn 13 August 2008
Cutting of highway verges, open spaces and play areas between Firtree Close and Linwood
To Vale Royal Borough Council by Trevor R Nunn 13 August 2008
Beechfields Winsford
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Trevor R Nunn 10 November 2009
LGO investigations
To Vale Royal Borough Council by Trevor R Nunn 16 January 2009
LGO investigations.
To Aylesbury Vale District Council by Trevor R Nunn 7 January 2009
Complaints
To Aylesbury Vale District Council by Trevor R Nunn 2 October 2008
LG Act 1974 Part III Section 32(3) notices
To Aylesbury Vale District Council by Trevor R Nunn 9 October 2009
Agreements
Trevor R Nunn made this Freedom of Information request to Vale Royal Borough Council
Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Vale Royal Borough Council should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.
From: Trevor R Nunn
13 October 2008
Dear Sir or Madam,
I would like a list of outstanding agreements between Vale Royal
Borough Council and developers/third parties on the Rookery rise
development that concern any of the land/properties between Fern
way and Firtree and form part of the estate known as Rookery Rise.
Clarification:
By agreement I mean any agreement between the council and a
developer/third party which includes but is not limited to section
106, 278 and 38 agreements.
By outstanding I mean those agreements in which the terms and
conditions have not yet been met.
You can exclude agreements between owner occupiers of any of the
properties concerned.
Yours faithfully,
Trevor R Nunn
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ( 3 November 2008)
Link to this