Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this requestAct on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Information about the Hills Road and Long Road guided busway bridges
To Cambridgeshire County Council by Paul Hollinghurst 16 May 2011
Guidance to drivers using the guided busway
To Cambridgeshire County Council by Mr Fletcher 28 August 2011
Busway Noise Assessment / Predictions / Methodology
To Cambridgeshire County Council by Martin Bond 26 March 2012
Change in vehicle type to Bus Route 78
To Southwark Borough Council by Nick Burton 18 January 2011
Busway contract Compensation Events
To Cambridgeshire County Council by Ian Jackson 9 March 2010
Bus route 78 vehicle change
To Transport for London by Nick Burton 18 January 2011
Busway defect list
To Cambridgeshire County Council by Ian Jackson 9 March 2010
Communication with Transport Minister Sadiq Kahn regarding busway
To Cambridgeshire County Council by Ian Jackson 12 March 2010
Status of maintenance track alongside Busway
To Cambridgeshire County Council by Cambridge Cycling Campaign 12 September 2011
Quality and Access Agreement
To Cambridgeshire County Council by Rupert Moss-Eccardt 4 March 2012
Additional work to accommodate Double Deck vehicles under Hills Road on the Guided Busway
Paul Hollinghurst made this Freedom of Information request to Cambridgeshire County Council
The request was successful.
From: Paul Hollinghurst
21 November 2011
Dear Cambridgeshire County Council,
In a recent newspaper report, Bob Menzies head of delivery for the
Guided Busway said that to accommodate double deck rather than
single deck buses under the Hills Road bridge "work would also have
been needed on railway signalling". Please could you provide a copy
of the document or report which describes this additional work on
the railway signalling.
Yours faithfully,
Paul Hollinghurst
From: FOI
Cambridgeshire County Council
21 November 2011
Dear Mr Hollinghurst
Re: Environmental Information Request ref 1519
Thank you for your email of 21 November 2011 in which you requested
information about additional work required on the railway signalling to
accommodate double deckers in the Hills Road area.
Your request will be dealt with in line with the Environmental
Information Regulations 2004. In accordance with the Regulations, the
Council aims to respond to all requests within 20 working days, in this
instance, by 19 December 2011.
If we require further information, clarification or a fee in order to
fulfil your request we will contact you again. Please quote the
reference number above in all future correspondence concerning this
request.
Yours sincerely,
Jo Withey
Information Governance Officer
RES1405
Shire Hall
Castle Hill
Cambridge
CB3 0AP
01223 729164
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you receive this email by mistake please notify the sender and delete it immediately. Opinions expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Cambridgeshire County Council. All sent and received email from Cambridgeshire County Council is automatically scanned for the presence of computer viruses and security issues.
Visit www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk
From: Menzies Bob
Cambridgeshire County Council
22 November 2011
Thank you for your request.
You asked the following:
In a recent newspaper report, Bob Menzies head of delivery for the
Guided Busway said that to accommodate double deck rather than single
deck buses under the Hills Road bridge "work would also have been needed
on railway signalling". Please could you provide a copy of the document
or report which describes this additional work on the railway
signalling.
The Cambridge Evening News shortened the statement issued by the
Council. The full statement was as follows:
Running single decker buses on the southern has always been part of the
Busway scheme and was set out clearly in the public consultation in 2003
and in the proposals subsequently presented to the Public Inquiry, when
there was the opportunity to raise comments about the scheme. The
southern section of the Busway has a number of bridges and the cost of
raising these to accommodate double deckers would have been very
significant and extremely disruptive. By limiting the southern section
to single decker buses, only minor repair work was necessary to Long
Road, Shelford Road and Hauxton Road Bridges. There is a high pressure
gas main under the Busway under the latter two bridges, just moving this
to lower the track would cost many millions of pounds assuming a route
could be agreed for it through the streets of Trumpington. At Hills Road
the new underpass is already lower than the adjacent railway tracks,
going any lower would require a major retaining structure to support the
railway line. The Busway also passes over all the signalling cables to
the railway signal box and a major water main before dropping under
Hills Road. Again these would need to be diverted to lower the Busway.
Therefore the additional works and massive costs could not be justified.
The Busway passes between the railway signal box and the railway. The
railway signal box is the brown building between Hills Road and the
busway in the attached photograph. All of the railway signalling cables
therefore pass under the busway to reach the railway. As the Busway was
built at ground level in a location previously occupied by railway
tracks it was possible to pass over the cables with minimal
interference. As no additional work was needed there is no report.
I hope this is helpful.
Bob Menzies
Head of Delivery Cambridgeshire Guided Busway
<<cambus air 31810 021 compress.jpg>>
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you receive this email by mistake please notify the sender and delete it immediately. Opinions expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Cambridgeshire County Council. All sent and received email from Cambridgeshire County Council is automatically scanned for the presence of computer viruses and security issues.
Visit www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk
From: Paul Hollinghurst
22 November 2011
Dear Bob Menzies,
Thank you very much for your reply giving more information about
the decision to limit the height of Hills Road Bridge to single
deck vehicles, which although not giving any figures does explain
the multiple significant issues which would pushed up the costs for
this infrastructure. I can understand that funding this would have
required changes to the overall plan for the southern section of
the busway.
This information was helpful.
Yours sincerely,
Paul Hollinghurst
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests




