Follow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this requestAct on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Chapel Level speeding up of motor traffic
To Fife Council by David Hansen 30 August 2011
Land in Kirkcaldy
To Fife Council by J Mackie 26 May 2012
Tramlink tram priority at traffic signals in Central Croydon
To Transport for London by James Mason 22 October 2010
Roundabouts and Traffic Signals
To Kent County Council by Paul Chapman 3 September 2010
Safety audits for Elmers End junction
To Bromley Borough Council by Shaun McDonald 2 August 2011
Goleuadau Traffig
To Swansea Council by C W Davies 16 September 2009
The most dangerous roads for cyclists in Cardiff
To Cardiff Council by Hannah Waldram 3 December 2009
Road Traffic Incidents/Collision/Accidents
To Staffordshire County Council by G Thomas 15 July 2011
20 mph speed limit reduction on Reading Road
To West Berkshire Council by David Jellett 15 December 2011
Traffic light phasing at junction of A406 and A13
To Transport for London by A Lovell 22 January 2010
Adam Smith Roundabout, Kirkcaldy
J Mackie made this Freedom of Information request to Fife Council
The request was successful.
From: J Mackie
12 January 2012
Dear Fife Council,
Please can you advise on the following questions relating to the
controversial new roundabout at the Adam Smith Theatre in
Kirkcaldy:
How much the works cost the Fife tax payers?
Who approved the project going forward?
Was a consultation undertaken with residents, businesses, etc in
relation to the proposals? If so, what was the feedback or results
of that consultation?
Was any analysis of the impacts of the changes undertaken in
relation to increased congestion, impact on businesses in the town
centre, increased travel time/disruption, increased 'rat running'
through neighbouring residential streets to avoid the lights,
increased polution (all the cars sitting waiting at the lights)..
How many complaints has Fife Council received relating to the new
junction to date? Conversely, how many compliments has Fife Council
received relating to the new junction to date?
What plans Fife Council have to rectify the situation? Are there
any plans to return the roundabout which worked fine for many
years?
Please treat this as FOISA request if necessary, response through
Whatdotheyknow.com is fine.
Many thanks.
Yours faithfully,
J Mackie
Fife Council
13 January 2012
Your e-mail has been forwarded to The Freedom of Information Officer for
their attention and response.
Thank you for contacting Fife Council.
Jill McLean,
Customer Services Advisor,
Contact Centre,
Kirkcaldy
"Think Green" and only print this email if absolutely necessary
>>> J Mackie <[FOI #100249 email]> 1/12/2012 5:56
pm >>>
Dear Fife Council,
Please can you advise on the following questions relating to the
controversial new roundabout at the Adam Smith Theatre in
Kirkcaldy:
How much the works cost the Fife tax payers?
Who approved the project going forward?
Was a consultation undertaken with residents, businesses, etc in
relation to the proposals? If so, what was the feedback or results
of that consultation?
Was any analysis of the impacts of the changes undertaken in
relation to increased congestion, impact on businesses in the town
centre, increased travel time/disruption, increased 'rat running'
through neighbouring residential streets to avoid the lights,
increased polution (all the cars sitting waiting at the lights)..
How many complaints has Fife Council received relating to the new
junction to date? Conversely, how many compliments has Fife Council
received relating to the new junction to date?
What plans Fife Council have to rectify the situation? Are there
any plans to return the roundabout which worked fine for many
years?
Please treat this as FOISA request if necessary, response through
Whatdotheyknow.com is fine.
Many thanks.
Yours faithfully,
J Mackie
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #100249 email]
Is [Fife Council request email] the wrong address for Freedom of
Information requests to Fife Council? If so, please contact us
using this form:
[1]http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[2]http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offic...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your
web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
show quoted sections
Fife Council
13 January 2012
Dear J Mackie,
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Thank you for your information request received on 13/01/2012 09:07 our reference: 1869. This is being dealt with in terms of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.
We are presently assessing your request and may be in touch soon to ask for further clarification or to offer advice and assistance if we are not able to fulfil your request in its present form.
The legislation allows us up to 20 working days from the date that we receive a valid request, including any clarification we require, to make a final response. We will be in touch within 20 working days of receipt of your initial request to provide our response or to seek clarification where necessary. We hope to provide you with the information you are looking for at an earlier date where possible.
Yours sincerely,
From: Scott Christie
Fife Council
23 January 2012
Dear J Mackie
I refer to your correspondence raising concerns about the recent works
carried out at the above junction as part of the Green Corridor project
Projected costs for the full project are £830k
In terms of consultation, community groups and transport operators have
been included at all stages, with specific consultation events including:
o Fife wide Area Transport Plan (ATP) public & stakeholder consultations
2002-03 including Town House Kirkcaldy 21/01/03 (with Stagecoach
participation)
o Fife wide Area Transport Plan refresh public & stakeholder
consultations ‘Where You Live How You Travel’ 2009
o Annual Fife wide ATP/ATWP consultations on Works Programme and Capital
schemes
o Detailed scheme consultation with Ward members December 2010
o Detailed scheme consultation with Stagecoach and Community Council
February 2011
o Reported to Committee for necessary approvals in September 2009,
October 2009 and March 2011
The Green Corridor project is focussed on improving access for pedestrians
and cyclists on this important route between the railway station, bus
station and High Street area. The focus was not about solving a
pre-existing traffic problem. In line with national policy the scheme
included elements of re-allocation of road space to create new shared use
footway/cycleways and introducing traffic signals to give dedicated time
to pedestrians and cyclists to cross where previously this was difficult
given the volume and speed of traffic at the Adam Smith junction area.
Clearly this means that time is taken away from vehicular traffic in
favour of the other modes, but by balancing the timings of the signals all
users can be given a fair share of the throughput.
The traffic signals were switched on, on Tuesday 20^th December in the
afternoon. This followed a period where the junction was operating on a
temporary basis with no pedestrian facility due to delays in Scottish
Power providing the electrical connection for the signals. It is
acknowledged that the week prior to Christmas is not the ideal time to
introduce a new traffic system however concerns at the safe operation of
the temporary situation justified the switch on at that time.
Whilst the initial timings and heavy Christmas traffic led to delays at
the junction at peak traffic times, it was considered prudent to formalise
the junction operation prior to the Christmas holiday period. The
initial signal design was carried out by specialist consultants and peak
time delays at the junction were anticipated, similar to those experienced
at the former roundabout junction.
On Thursday 22^nd December the timings were adjusted to increase traffic
capacity. This resulted in improvements to traffic flow with most queues
clearing in one cycle but peak traffic conditions still had some delays.
Refinements to the signal timings have continued and staff have been
observing the junction operation throughout. When traffic patterns
returned to ‘normal’ on Tuesday 10^th January, with most people back to
work and the schools having returned, on site observations showed the
junction to be operating satisfactorily. At peak times nearly all
vehicles cleared the junction on a single cycle, with the only exception
being on the St Brycedale Avenue approach where for a short period around
5.00p.m. some delays were experienced. A fault in the signal equipment
was identified at this time and rectified on Wednesday 11^th January which
has the effect of increasing the vehicle throughput. There have been
problems noted with the sensors, but we are monitoring and dealing with
these. Cameras have been installed over the past week to capture video
real time monitoring to assist with fully optimising the signals. I
accept the comments you make in relation to the delays initially
experienced at this junction in the first 2 days of switch on, but can
confirm that these have now been eliminated.
While it is accepted that the delays initially experienced at this
junction in the first 2 days of switch on were unacceptable these have
been eliminated and the junction is now operating as anticipated.
Monitoring of the junction operation will continue however it is not
envisaged that any further changes will be required.
I trust that all the aforementioned comments satisfactorily answer the
queries you have raised.
best regards
Scott
"Think Green" and only print this email if absolutely necessary
show quoted sections
From: J Mackie
28 January 2012
Dear Scott Christie,
Thanks for your response, perhaps you can answer all the points I
raised please.
£830k on a junction? This is where our tax money goes in a time of
cut backs, pay freezes, pay offs, rising unemployment and a decline
of the high street? I would have thought the money could have been
much better spent!
Yours sincerely,
J Mackie
From: Scott Christie
Fife Council
1 February 2012
Dear J Mackie
the costs quoted are for the whole Green Corridor project not just the
junction improvement.
The scheme was approved by Kirkcaldy Area Committee.
We have received approx 20 negative written comments, most of these relate
to the first two days of operation where the signal timing were not
correct.
Councillors intimated at the Kirkcaldy Area Committee on 25th January that
they were now beginning to receive positive comments from constituents
relating to the junction. I do not have specific numbers to share with
you.
I hope this is helpful
best regards
Scott
"Think Green" and only print this email if absolutely necessary
>>> J Mackie <[FOI #100249 email]> 28/01/2012 01:18
>>>
Dear Scott Christie,
Thanks for your response, perhaps you can answer all the points I
raised please.
£830k on a junction? This is where our tax money goes in a time of
cut backs, pay freezes, pay offs, rising unemployment and a decline
of the high street? I would have thought the money could have been
much better spent!
Yours sincerely,
J Mackie
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





John Strachan left an annotation (11 March 2012)
Those thinking that it's safer for pedestrians should go and watch them all crossing against the red man signal, they won't wait in the rain and cold for a green man.
Do we really want large sums spent on expensive schemes which hold us all up, with dubiety over whether it is an improvement or not.
It will be very hard to justify council job cuts when huge sums of money are spent on schemes such as this
Link to this