Follow this request

There is 1 person following this request

Offensive? Unsuitable?

Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).

If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators

Report this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

More similar requests

Event history details

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

Accountability for employment of Court Officers in the Family Court

Charlotte Peters Rock made this Freedom of Information request to Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service

The request is waiting for clarification. If you are Charlotte Peters Rock, please sign in to send a follow up message.

From: Charlotte Peters Rock

30 October 2010

Dear Her Majesty's Courts Service,
Under Freedom of Information Act 2000 I wish to be informed

1. Who is responsible and accountable for the employment of
'Officers of The Court'?

2. The question above is asked with particular reference to the
employment of Guardians ad Litem who operate within the Family
Court System.

3. Who is responsible for checking and agreeing the veracity of
information provided to the Family Court, in respect of such
proposed 'Officers of the Court'?

4. Who is responsible for investigating the fraudulent actions of
those people who become 'Officers of the Court' whilst not holding
the proper qualification to perform that job?

5. (re question 4) How many such investigations have taken place
during the last 5 years?

6. (re question 5) With what result?

7. (re question 4) How many of those investigations have taken
place in Manchester Family Court, during the last 5 years?

8. (re question 7) With what result?

Yours faithfully,

Charlotte Peters Rock

Link to this

From: Over, Darren (ARU)
Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service

2 November 2010

Freedom of Information Request FOI/67782/10

Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Zone 6 B
Post point 6.25
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

T 020 3334 3251
F 020 3334 2245
E [HMCS request email]

www.justice.gov.uk

02-NOV-10 Our Ref:FOI/67782/10

Dear Charlotte Rock,

SUBJECT: Freedom of Information Request

Thank you for your correspondence of October 30, 2010, in which you
asked for information about the accountability for employment of Court
Officers in the Family Court under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
(FOIA) from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).

You will receive a response from us by November 26, 2010. Your request
has been passed to the appropriate business unit within the MoJ, and
they will write to you with their decision by this date.

The FOIA does provide a number of exemptions. A qualified exemption
requires that before relying on it we must consider the public interest
test. If the information you have requested is covered by a qualified
exemption(s) under FOIA, the Department is allowed to take longer than
20 working days to respond. This is because in such circumstances we are
required to consider the public interest issues when deciding whether or
not to disclose the information requested.

If more time is needed to consider the public interest issues under a
qualified exemption(s), we will write to you and inform you of the
revised date you can expect to receive a response to your request.

If you have any queries regarding this request please do not hesitate to
contact us. Please quote ref: FOI/67782/10 in all future correspondence.

Yours sincerely,

Darren Over
(Sent on behalf of Caroline Banjo)
Data Access and Compliance Unit

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

From: Charlotte Peters Rock

2 November 2010

For the Personal Attention of: Caroline Banjo

Dear Ms Banjo,

Thank you for the prompt response. However it causes me grave
concern that you have passed my FOI request to the Ministry of
Justice, which has thus far refused to respond (since 06 September)
to another FOI request, made directly to them, at the suggestion of
the Home Office - which had itself denied accountability.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ac...

Since this current FOI request, which was submitted to you, at
HMCS, is in respect of there currently being no apparent need for
any legal standing of Court Officers in such vulnerable cases as
child protection, fostering and adoption, one would assume that a
cogent and immediate answer might be more appropriate, and that
such answer should come readily from HMCS, which has the legal duty
to oversee the work inside its own Family Courts.

The questions submitted, were as might be readily understood, in
need of immediate answer, not 'no answer at all', as seems to be
the policy of the so-called Ministry of Justice.

I would be grateful if as a matter of urgency, you could personally
give answers to the questions already submitted.

Yours sincerely,

Charlotte Peters Rock

Link to this

From: Charlotte Peters Rock

29 November 2010

Personal Attention of: Ms Caroline Banjo

Dear Over, Darren (ARU), and Ms Caroline Banjo,

Having written under Freedom of Information Act rules for
information which Her Majesty's Court Service surely holds, I note
that you have not replied within the regulation number of days as
required by law.

I wonder if Her Majesty's Court Service regards itself as being
above the law?

The letter above, states:

"You will receive a response from us by November 26, 2010. Your
request has been passed to the appropriate business unit within the
MoJ, and they will write to you with their decision by this date."

Perhaps I could point out to you that 'being tossed about between
various agencies which claim to uphold the law' is not my idea of
an adequate response?

Nor has any response arrived.

I would now like an internal review into why Her Majesty's
so-called 'Court Service' has not yet responded.

I would also like - as a matter of urgency - to receive a clear and
completely explained response to my questions.

Yours sincerely,

Charlotte Peters Rock

Link to this

From: Brigland, Paul
Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service

2 December 2010


Attachment 67782.doc
210K Download View as HTML


Dear Ms Peters Rock

I am replying on behalf of Caroline Banjo to your e-mail of 29 November
2010, as Caroline is currently away from the office.

I attach a copy of the reply sent to you by Lance Holden in HM Court
Service. I am sorry if you did not receive the original, but I can
confirm the reply was sent at 8:16 am on the 17th November.

Yours sincerely

Paul Brigland
Head of A2J, CPG and LR&I Disclosure Section
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry Of Justice
6th Floor
102 Petty France
London. SW1H 9AJ

Tel: 020 3334 3259
Fax: 020 3334 2245

<<67782.doc>>

show quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service only: