Accountability - and where to turn for it

Dear Home Office,

1. Can you please tell me what legal duty is owed to the public by
senior (and other) professionals such as Coroners, Toxicologists,
Pathologists, Medical Consultants, Doctors and Nurses, in respect
of unwarranted deliberate killing, where they are aware that such
killing has taken place?

2. Is there any part of the work contract of such people, to group
together and force a public or police inquiry, where such deaths
have taken place?

3. Is there any legal right of NHS Health Trusts to prevent such
demand for investigation, should one or more of that Trust's
employees need to make such a demand?

4. How can an ill-served member of the public, whose relative has
been unlawfully killed, using professional staff and noxious drugs
belonging to the NHS, insist on a public investigation and criminal
trial?

5. What legal or other help is in place for such insistence,
assuming that member of the public does not have unlimited access
to funds to pursue the major Court action which would be necessary?

6. Where formal and thorough investigation of a deliberately
procured killing has been refused by senior police officers who
regularly state, "my hands are tied", and by Judges who clearly
show that they have not read or taken account of the documents in
front of them, what can be done to insist on a comprehensive
investigation of that deliberately procured killing, which has used
the facilities and drugs of NHS Trusts?

7. Who oversees the actions of a Senior Police Officer, since the
Police Authority, and IPCC have refused such oversight?

8. Why will no-one at the Ministry for Justice, oversee the actions
of Coroners, who misapply the law and refuse to call essential
witnesses to an inquest following such an unwarranted killing?

9. Who can be written to, at the Home Office, who will be
accountable and will actually read and understand documents
which are readily available and which prove that the elderly are
being unnecessarly and deliberately killed, using the NHS?

10. Is there any plan to make legally accountable, those supposed
overseeing and investigative agencies such as IPCC, GMC, MNC, GSCC,
PHSO, Law Society, Office for Judicial Review, etc, which currently
are not doing the job for which we pay them?

11. If so, when will people employed by those agencies become
accountable for their actions, instead of constantly 'passing the
buck'?

12. What changes have been made as a result of the very strong
recommendations made by Senior Judge, Dame Janet Smith - following
the shocking revelations of the Shipman Inquiry - to prevent such
ease of killing of the old and vulnerable?

Yours faithfully,

Charlotte Peters Rock

Dear Home Office,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Home Office's
handling of my FOI request 'Accountability - and where to turn for
it'.

It seems to me that Linda Ingram (no job title - no accountability)
is passing the buck in a big way.

If the questions were asked of you, then the answers need to be
provided by you.

Passing on the responsibility to inner space - outer space - no
space at all - is not a reasonable thing to do, especially when the
person requesting the information is a relative of someone who was
murdered in his bed, and your organisation will not take the
responsibility for the actions of those who it is perfectly clear
have acted both illegally and morally wrongly

If the Home Office is incapable of an adequate response, why are we
paying the wages of those who work there?

That is a question which requires an answer. The Home Office is the
place from which I request that answer, since it is apparent that
its fudging of all issues is the reason why my father's killing has
not been adequately investigated.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ac...

Yours faithfully,

Charlotte Peters Rock