Access to the Justice System DENIED

Sheila Gibb made this Freedom of Information request to Office for Judicial Complaints

The request was refused by Office for Judicial Complaints.

From: Sheila Gibb

27 July 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am unclear if this office is the correct "provider of
information". If this is NOT the case could you please pass to the
Ministry for Justice.

I am a distant consumer of the UK financial services industry and
an endowment mortgage policyholder to boot. Due to 2005/60
objective 15 and the finance industry illegally sidelining ALL
endowment policyholders into Insurance Intermediaries I (along with
millions of other policyholders) have acquired the status of MONEY
LAUNDERER. This is further compounded by customer due diligence
CRAP that states I must have a UK address to be "an identified
person". As a single independent skilled working migrant British /
Australian citizen with the rights to Canadian citizenship I am not
impressed here.

This money laundering directive now makes it impossible for skilled
mobile workers to DEFEND their PROPERTY RIGHTS. I would like to
know the following:

1. How many distant endowment policyholders are "caught in this
trap" of NO ACCESS to the JUSTICE SYSTEM for LEGAL REPRESENTATION
and thus REDRESS FROM THE COURTS?
2. HOW do such policyholders STOP the Time Limitations Act from
denying them JUSTICE?

I personally have had to cease work and return to the UK to STOP
the council STEALING my HOME courtesy of this absurd Housing Act.
(This Act enables the council to remove our agents, we cannot
replace these from overseas and of course the council can then
STEAL our VACANT HOMES. CHARMING!) Of course I have NO MEANINGFUL
COMPENSATION for my LOST ENDOWMENT INVESTMENTS and DEBT ON MY HOME
FOR LIFE. I have NO INCOME as I must live in my home to acquire an
"identity". NO lawyer on the publicly funded list will REPRESENT ME
RE A WHOLE RANGE OF LEGAL ISSUES. I would like to know;

1. HOW do those of us charged with money laundering get a lawyer to
work for us? Publicly funded lawyers with the relevant "expertise"
will DEFEND fraudsters individually named by the finance industry
but WILL NOT LITIGATE ON BEHALF OF MILLIONS OF DISTANCE CONSUMERS.
AND THAT WOULD BE EVEN WHEN ONE OF THESE CONSUMERS HAS RE-LOCATED
TO THE UK TO ACCESS THE JUSTICE SYSTEM!!!!!
2. HOW do we get a "judicial review" to enable those distance
consumers who CANNOT employ lawyers from overseas to STOP them from
having claims TIME BARRED? I do NOT understand HOW it is possible
for any "justice system" to deny me the right to put a claim before
the court as lawyers have not been willing to represent distance
consumers since 2002.
3. HOW do we "charge" this government with FAILURE TO APPLY THE
DISTANCE CONSUMER LEGISLATION (2002/65) and CONSUMER REGULATION
2006/2004 (which even Commissioner McCreevy IGNORES when writing
his obscene and highly ILLEGAL money laundering directives) WHEN
DISTANT?
4. WHY does this government still continue to apply 2005/60 when it
has been DECLARED ILLEGAL BY THE EU COURT?

Which brings me as an endowment policyholder to the criminals IN
the UK finance industry. Since 1993 these lovely people have been
denying me access to my legally acquired wealth / property. (They
have even removed orders of sale from the Australian stock exchange
to deny me the ability to raise cash for legal proceedings in
Canada!) In fact I now have it in writing from my current bank /
mortgage provider (and I still have an interest only loan with
endowments attached as NO distance consumer can change this!!!)
that I CAN NEVER ACCESS THE EQUITY IN MY HOME TO SUE THE CRIMINALS
IN THE ENDOWMENT SECTOR. When overseas and NOT at a UK address the
UK finance industry can raise a "Suspicious Activity Report" to
deny me getting my wealth and when I'm in the country RESIDENT AT
MY HOME ADDRESS I have NO (rental) INCOME and therefore cannot
repay borrowing!!!!!! So

1. HOW DO I PAY FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND HOW DO I STOP EVERYONE
HERE FROM STEALING MY PROPERTY (MOVABLE AND IMMOVABLE) WHEN I
CANNOT DEFEND MY PROPERTY RIGHTS?
2. WHEN ARE BRITISH CITIZENS GOING TO BE PERMITTED TO RAISE
"SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS" CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES OF
THE UK FINANCE SYSTEM? If we are "all equal before the law" then
this should be implemented at once.
3. HOW do members of the public get the POLICE SOCA / ASSET
RECOVERY AGENCY and indeed the LAWYERS to INVESTIGATE THEIR BUDDIES
(FSA and BBA's JMLSG) ON THE TREASURY'S MONEY LAUNDERING ADVISORY
COMMITTEE? The "separation of powers" between the finance industry
and the judiciary / law enforcement appear to have been
substantially eroded and to th detriment of millions of
consumers!!!!!!

I would love any information to assist me re the above and
particularly HOW MANY CONSUMERS of the UK FINANCE INDUSTRY ARE
EFFECTIVELY BETWEEN A ROCK AND AND PLACE as they are mobile skilled
workers retaining legitimate assets in this country. (Oh and of
course "natural persons" that is industry are NOT subjected to this
CRAP but ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CRIME ON THE PLANET!) And can you
advise WHEN I will be able to RAISE REPORTS about the criminal
activities of the UK finance system

Yours faithfully,

Sheila Gibb

Link to this

From: Mulvaney, Max
Office for Judicial Complaints

28 July 2009

Our Ref: 6393/2009

Dear Sheila,

Thank you for your e-mail dated 27^th July 2009.

I hope you will find it helpful if I explain that the role of the Office
for Judicial Complaints (OJC) is to support the Lord Chief Justice and the
Lord Chancellor in their joint responsibilities for judicial conduct and
discipline. Their responsibilities cover matters relating to allegations
of personal misconduct in the way that a judicial office holder has
behaved, whether inside or outside of the courtroom.

Issues of personal conduct include, but are not restricted to, use of
profane, sexist, or racist language, behaving aggressively, or shouting.
Where incidents involving the personal conduct of a judicial office holder
occur, the Office for Judicial Complaints will make further enquiries. If
allegations of personal misconduct are substantiated, The Lord Chancellor
and Lord Chief Justice will jointly decide what disciplinary action, if
any, is necessary.

Neither the Lord Chief Justice, the Lord Chancellor nor officials in this
Office, is able to consider or intervene with complaints about judicial
decisions. The only way in which a judicial decision can be challenged is
by appeal to a higher court.

The term `judicial decision' encompasses issues relating to the way in
which a judge chooses to handle a case; decisions made on the evidence
that will be considered and/or dismissed; the weight attached to evidence
that is considered, the final outcome of the case and other ancillary
things such as costs and sentencing. The principle of judicial
independence from government means that these things can only be
challenged via the legal process, on appeal if so advised.

Please accept my apologies but we are therefore unable to assist you
further in this matter. You may wish to visit our website
www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk for further information.

Yours sincerely,

Max Mulvaney - Office for Judicial Complaints

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Office for Judicial Complaints only: