Abuse of Disabled Children Using Behavior Modification Funded By Governmment + Medical Experimentation Without Consent

Dear Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education,

Please send all information regarding the legal rights of (abused)
children, being so via internationally outlawed, behavior
modification in schools run by 'ambitious about autism'/'pears
national []' 'treehouse trust', 'national autistic society' etc -
and local governments are funding such abuses knowingly breaking
mulitple laws and causing SIGNIFICANT HARM to vulnerable children
and adults, as well as causing DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY - aka =
kidnap and experimentaion on disabled children and adults

THERE IS NO 'INFORMED CONSENT'

Pfizer sued for improper consent in medical experiments in Nigeria
- Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 02-9223 (2d Cir. 10/08/2003)

How Specific Must the Notice be in FTCA Cases? - Goodman v. U.S.,
298 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2002) - this case involved a claim for
failure of consent to an experimental treatment.

Court rejects 35 year informed consent claims against researchers -
Heinrich v. Sweet, 308 F.3d 48 (1st Cir. 2002)

Physician sued for allowing drug company representative to
participate in patient care - Sanchez-Scott v. Alza
Pharmaceuticals, 86 Cal.App.4th 365, 103 Cal.Rptr.2d 410 (Cal.App.
Dist.2 2001)

CA Limits Right to Terminate Life Support When There Is Familial
Conflict - Wendland v. Wendland, 26 Cal.4th 519, 28 P.3d 151, 110
Cal.Rptr.2d 412 (Cal. 2001)

No Consent is not failure of informed consent - Wuerz v. Huffaker,
42 S.W.3d 652 (Mo.App. E.D. 2001)

Is There A Duty To Recommend Quack Cures? - Schiff v. Prados, 112
Cal.Rptr.2d 171, 1 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8547, 2001 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 10,547 Cal.App. 1 Dist. Sep 28, 2001.

Maryland Court Imposes Judicial Review on Non-Therapeutic Research
on Children - Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc., No. 128
September Term, 2000 (Md. 08-16-2001)

Brief - No liability for providing life-saving care to an infant
over the parents' refusal - HCA. Inc. v. Miller, 36 S.W.3d 187
(2000)

Brief - Physicians do not have a duty to disclose illicit drug use
to their patients - Albany Urology Clinic, P.C. v. Cleveland, 272
Ga. 296, 528 S.E.2d 777 (Ga., Mar 06, 2000)

Brief - Misrepresentations about a physician's qualifications void
informed consent - Duttry v. Patterson, 741 A.2d 199 (Pa.Super.,
1999) - on appeal

Research Subjects Must Be Told If Treatment Is Available Outside
The Trial - Stewart v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 136 Ohio App.3d
244, 736 N.E.2d 491 (Ohio App. Dist.8 12/06/1999)

Court holds that there can be liability for rendering emergency
care against the patient's consent - Shine v. Vega, 429 Mass. 456,
709 N.E.2d 58 (Mass. 1999) - This is a complex case and must be
read carefully. The action was based on a later refusal to go to
the hospital because of previous unconsented emergency care. While
the court recognized that there can be liability for refusing to
honor the patient's wishes, it is not clear that this case is a
good example.

Withdrawal of life-support is covered by the LA medical malpractice
act - Causey v. St. Francis Medical Center, 719 So.2d 1072 (La.App.
Cir.2 1998)

Informed Consent in Louisiana - Lugenbuhl v. Dowling, 701 So.2d 447
(La. 1997), rehearing denied (Nov 21, 1997).

State may ban physician-assisted suicide - Vacco v. Quill, 117 S.
Ct. 2293 (U.S. 1997) and Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702
(1997)

NJ Allows malpractice claim for not warning child of parent's
genetic predisposition to cancer - Safer v. Estate of Pack, 291
N.J.Super. 619, 677 A.2d 1188 (N.J.Super.App.Div. 1996)

Physician's experience as an element of informed consent - Johnson
v. Kokemoor, 545 N.W.2d 495, 199 Wis. 2d 615 (Wi 1996)

FL recognizes duty to warn patient of transmissibility of genetic
disease to child - Pate v. Threlkel, 661 So.2d 278 (Fla. 1995),
rehearing denied (Oct 10, 1995)

Wilkerson v. Mid-America Cardiology, 908 S.W.2d 691 (Mo.App. W.D.
Jul 25, 1995) - This case is a good example of how systems failures
in a hospital's consent process can result in a patient having
surgery without any consent having been obtained.

No duty to inform patient of non-medical information - ARATO v.
AVEDON 858 P.2d 598 (Cal 1993)

Supreme Court sets standards for proving refusal of medical care -
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dep't of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990)

Moore v. Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal.
1990) - This case establishes that a physician must disclose
conflicts of interest that can affect patient care. It is based on
breach of fiduciary duty and is one of the few cases to arise from
medical research.

May a patient consent to unorthodox treatment? - Schneider v.
Revici, 817 F.2d 987 (2nd Cir. 1987)

Soldier cannot sue government for LSD experiments - U.S. v.
Stanley, 479 U.S. 1005 (1986)

Moore v. Preventive Medicine Medical Group Inc., 178 Cal. App. 3d
728, 223 Cal. Rptr. 859 (Cal.App.Dist.2 03-11-1986) - This case
involves the failure of a referring physician to properly inform
the patient of the importance of seeing the specialist and not
assuring that the patient went to the appointment.

Truman v. Thomas, 611 P.2d 902 (Cal. 1980) - This case involves the
failure to warn the patient of the risks of not consenting to a
diagnostic test.

Nurse Disciplined for Telling Patient about Alternative Treatments
- Tuma v. Board of Nursing, 100 Idaho 74, 593 P.2d 711 (Idaho Apr
17, 1979) - This is an older case in which a nurse who told a
patient about alternative treatments was disciplined for
unprofessional conduct for interfering with the physician-patient
relationship.

Canterbury v. Spence., 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972) - Classic case
articulating the reasonable patient standard.

Cobbs v. Grant, 8 Cal. 3d 229, 502 P.2d 1, 104 Cal. Rptr. 505 (Cal.
1972) - This is one of the first modern informed consent cases.

Hospital cannot require a release of liability before treatment -
Tunkl v. Regents of University of California, 60 Cal. 2d 92, 383
P.2d 441, 32 Cal. Rptr. 33 (Cal. 1963)

Consent as a fiduciary duty - Moore v. Webb, 345 S.W.2d 239
(Mo.App. 1961) - This is a classic early case based on total
failure of consent to extract plaintiff's teeth.

Schoendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., 105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y.
1914)

I refer to Articles of Law including International Law

Barrett v. United States, 6660 F. Supp. 1291 (E. D. N.Y., 1987).

88 . Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 146 (1950).

89 . United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987).

90 . 483 U.S. 669, 682.

91 . 483 U.S. 669, 687-88.

92 . 483 U.S. 669, 709-10.

I also refer to the:

Disability and the Equality Act 2010

Childrens' Act, Equality Act, ECHR and various other laws that are
not being implemented, forcing people tolook intenrationally for
advice and possible action agaist the UK due to these violations
that have been taking place approx since

LUCY v. ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON and CHELSEA [1997] EWHC Admin
23 (16th January, 1997)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE C0/4138/96
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
(CROWN OFFICE LIST )

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2

Thursday, 16th January 1997

Yours faithfully,

Elizabeth Lucy R

Dear Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education,

I would just like to follow this message for clarity that I no
longer support 'ABA'/any type of such behaviour modification due to
having witnessed child-abuse by the people involved first-hand,
having been lied to by the people who coaerced me into taking the
SEN Tribunal Action resulting in the case mentioned in my previous
letter (final paragraph, Lucy V rbkc) - in short, I was fed many
and huge lies and my child abused since 1997, I want this stopped
right now, people are harmed, others completely conned to fund this
abuse

Yours faithfully,

Liz R

Dear Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education,

Thank you, OFSTED directed me to Michael Gove, the Department for
Education is apparently barely distinguishable from any other legal
department here in the UK at the moment, meanwhile, this request
applies to the Scottish also and yes I am aware, thank you, kind
regards

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

Dear Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education,

I am sorry you do not understand my original request, I cannot
speak Pik, a little Breton perhaps, please forward to your head of
department so she/he may decipher it for you as I believe I put my
question/request very clearly

Yours sincerely,

Liz R