Hello! (Sign in or sign up)

Track this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

Traveller Site In Brooke I am aware that it is normal practice for the SNDC to make grant applications to DCLG and then if successful to seek planning consent, and have few... Partially successful.
Clarification sent to South Norfolk District Council by C. P. ELLIOTT on 4 November 2008.
barnham Broom Dear Mr Carruthers, I can inform you that South Norfolk Council has 3 current accounts registered for Barnham Broom Country and Golf Club. None are g... Partially successful.
Some information sent by South Norfolk District Council to Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS on 3 September 2009.
Land Charges II Dear Mr Carruthers Many of your requests have been identified as vexatious, not only those that relate to the failure of SNDC to appoint an electoral... Awaiting internal review.
Response by South Norfolk District Council to Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS on 26 November 2009.

More similar requests

Event history details

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

abolition of SNDC

A Freedom of Information request to South Norfolk District Council by Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

The request was successful.

Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

4 November 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please provide copies of all papers related to the proposed merger
of the South Norfolk district Council and Breckland Council as
reported in the EDP.

http://www.edp24.co.uk/content/edp24/new...

Please identify additionally if the SNDC has met with Breckland in
Barnham Broom

Yours faithfully,

Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

Link to this | Send follow up

Right2Know
South Norfolk District Council

6 November 2009

Dear Mr Carruthers

Thank you for your request of information that is being considered. You
may be aware that we have 20 working days in which to respond to Freedom
Of Information (FOI) requests and you will therefore hear from me again
by 2 December 2009 or earlier if possible.

For your information, the Act defines a number of exemptions, which may
prevent release of the information you have requested. There will be an
assessment and if any of the exemption categories apply then some or all
of the information may not be released. You will be informed if this is
the case, including your rights of appeal.

If any of the information you have requested is not contained in a
recorded format, South Norfolk Council is not obliged to create
information for the purpose of responding to your request

There may be a fee payable for 'reasonable disbursement' costs such as
postage and photocopying. This will be considered and you will be
informed if a fee is payable. In this event the fee must be paid before
the information is processed and released. The 20 working day time limit
for responses is suspended until receipt of the payment.

If you have any queries or concerns then please let me know. If you do
contact us again concerning this request, please quote FOI 09-269.

Regards

Emma Nangle
Information Rights Officer
South Norfolk Council
Long Stratton Norwich
NR15 2XE
tel: 01508 533747
email: [South Norfolk District Council request email]
website: www.south-norfolk.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS left an annotation (14 November 2009)

the issues are also being discussed here..

http://www.edp24.co.uk/content/edp24/new...

"Mr Fuller said the process was not “unitary through the back door” but a way of maintaining local control over vital services"

amazingly the area under dispute includes the SW Norfolk Parliamentary Coinitstituancy that has been subject to so many problems associated with the bullingdon club..

Link to this

Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

17 November 2009

Dear Right2Know,

These documents have not been made available.. are they only to be
made available to the local political associations..

.. or do they point to serve that the SNDC protestations to the
boundary commission were an hypocrisy designed to maintain paid
party political workers (i.e. local elected representatives) who
will support the acts of the staff to maintain their party.

Yours sincerely,

Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

Link to this | Send follow up

Right2Know
South Norfolk District Council

30 November 2009


Attachment LGA 091021 Questions for group and asnwers.doc
26K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Carruthers

I refer to your Freedom of Information request to which I am now in a
position to respond. Please find attached the paper that was leaked to
the press detailing questions and answers that is referred to in the EDP
report that you refer to in your request.

I can also advise you that South Norfolk Council has not met with
Breckland at Barnham Broom to discuss shared services.

I hope this is of assistance and is sufficient to meet your
requirements, but if, for whatever reason you wish to get back to me,
please feel free to do so. In particular if you are unhappy with the
information provided or how your request was handled please let me know
and I will explain how you can request an internal review of our
decision.

Please quote FOI 09-269 in any further correspondence concerning this
request.

Regards

Emma Nangle
Information Rights Officer
South Norfolk Council
Long Stratton Norwich
NR15 2XE
tel: 01508 533747
email: [South Norfolk District Council request email]
website: www.south-norfolk.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
South Norfolk District Council only: