RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND ASSESSMENT
SALTBURN
Site Number
Respondents (list)
Summary of comments made (list to avoid duplication)
GENERAL
Mike Morrisey
Mr and Mrs Cowell
Mark Jackson
John Desborough
Mrs Brenda Desborough
Leslie Manship
Objects to any development - Saltburn would lose its identity. Suggests using the telephone exchange at the corner of Princes Road/Windsor Road for development.
If there is a need for building in Saltburn then surely the infants/junior school would satisfy that need. Development would result in loss of divider between Marske and Saltburn.
Objects - loss of greenbelt.
Development would spoil the unique character of the town, it would be better to develop on entirely new sites possibly to the South East of Saltburn, before Skelton.
Would not like to see Saltburn as just another housing estate and part of a large urban sprawl.
You have failed to show which sites you have rejected including council owned land or recently sold land (Caravan Park).
OFFICER RESPONSE:
SALTBURN
Site Number
Respondents (list)
Summary of comments made (list to avoid duplication)
55
St. Mark's Parochial Church Council
Development of this site would be a contradiction of the Structure Plan/Council's own Local Plan.
56
St. Mark's Parochial Church Council
Ronald Gosling
Sally A Howe
Development of this site would be a contradiction of the Structure Plan/Council's own Local Plan.
Requires a transport link.
Development on this site would decrease the value of her property.
77
Mrs Barbara Burrell
Objects - congestion, parking, loss of agricultural land, visual effect.
216
Ronald Gosling
This site includes our factory (HW Jarvis), a major employer in the area, housing development provides us with an opportunity to bid for provision to developers, an opportunity that won't exist if we don't. Land clean up would be required on this site.