This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Comments to SHLA November 2007'.

RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND ASSESSMENT

SALTBURN

Site Number

Respondents (list)

Summary of comments made (list to avoid duplication)

GENERAL

Mike Morrisey

Mr and Mrs Cowell

Mark Jackson

John Desborough

Mrs Brenda Desborough

Leslie Manship

  • Objects to any development - Saltburn would lose its identity. Suggests using the telephone exchange at the corner of Princes Road/Windsor Road for development.

  • If there is a need for building in Saltburn then surely the infants/junior school would satisfy that need. Development would result in loss of divider between Marske and Saltburn.

  • Objects - loss of greenbelt.

  • Development would spoil the unique character of the town, it would be better to develop on entirely new sites possibly to the South East of Saltburn, before Skelton.

  • Would not like to see Saltburn as just another housing estate and part of a large urban sprawl.

  • You have failed to show which sites you have rejected including council owned land or recently sold land (Caravan Park).

OFFICER RESPONSE:

SALTBURN

Site Number

Respondents (list)

Summary of comments made (list to avoid duplication)

55

St. Mark's Parochial Church Council

  • Development of this site would be a contradiction of the Structure Plan/Council's own Local Plan.

56

St. Mark's Parochial Church Council

Ronald Gosling

Sally A Howe

  • Development of this site would be a contradiction of the Structure Plan/Council's own Local Plan.

  • Requires a transport link.

  • Development on this site would decrease the value of her property.

77

Mrs Barbara Burrell

  • Objects - congestion, parking, loss of agricultural land, visual effect.

216

Ronald Gosling

  • This site includes our factory (HW Jarvis), a major employer in the area, housing development provides us with an opportunity to bid for provision to developers, an opportunity that won't exist if we don't. Land clean up would be required on this site.

OFFICER RESPONSE: