./foiextract20101202-3256-g0phqt-0

ROADSIDE VERGE NATURE RESERVES
IN WORCESTERSHIRE
Annual Report 2007-2008
Report to Worcestershire County Council
Department of Environmental Infrastructure
January 2008

1
Foreword
CONTENTS
Page
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. SUMMARY 3
2.1 Management of sites 3
2.1.1 Liaison 3
2.1.2 Monitoring 4
2.1.3 New Sites 4
2.2 Maintenance of sites 4
2.2.1 Cutting 4
2.2.2 Posts 4
2.3. Summary Table of RVNRs 5
3. REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT & MAINTENANCE 7
4. NEW SITES 16
APPENDIX 1
The Roadside Verge Nature Reserve Criteria
APPENDIX 2
Highways Agency Species Action Plan for Deptford Pink
1. INTRODUCTION
Roadside verges have been regarded as important conservation sites by the “more
enlightened” for many years and it seems that in recent years the general view of them
has finally come into line with this thinking. This will be pleasing to those who
campaigned so hard to in the late 1980s and early 1990s for verges to have this
recognition. As noted in many previous reports, roadside verges now have their own
Habitat Action Plan (HAP) within the Worcestershire Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP)
and The Highways Agency has also produced a BAP for the verges that they manage
on a national basis.
This importance is of course not just based on botanical interest but on the
significance of verges as ecological units. It is not only the verges that are species-rich
or support rare and scarce flora and fauna that are important. The word “important”
applies to all verges, whether they are RVNRs - and therefore by implication the
“cream of the crop” - or merely strips of grass alongside an urban bypass. Clearly
some will have limited interest but in general by forming links between other habitats
verges provide substantial areas that form part of the wider landscape.
As the move towards Wider Area Conservation grows verges will play a vital part in
linking sites not just within this county but across the boundaries into others. The
current pressure on the countryside to build new houses with all of the associated
infrastructure means that verges can be used to alleviate the effects of fragmentation
that will inevitably occur. With this in mind, perhaps it is time to adopt a new attitude

to the often humble verge. It is certainly an opportunity to undertake innovative
measures; for example the creation of new, “purpose-built” verges alongside new or
re-aligned roads or the deliberate retention of conservation sites. In order to be
effective this must be addressed at the highest level, i.e. within the initial planning
stages, where all too often ecological interest is the last thing to be considered
2. SUMMARY
2.1 Management of Sites
2.1.1 Liaison
As in all the previous years, liaison was maintained with staff of the HPUs in order to
address any specific issues that arose and it is worth reiterating that we are always
available for any specialist advice regarding any works that may affect any of the
sites. Now that the sites are recorded on the GIS system it is easy to identify them, as
well as any issues arising and so with advice close at hand any problems should easily
be overcome.
Further liaison with Plantlife, the national plant conservation charity, continued over
sites ……….These tower mustard (Arabis glabra) sites are of national
importance for the survival of this critically endangered plant.

4
2.1.2 Monitoring
The results of the monitoring programme are summarised in the reports on individual
sites. As always, each verge was visited at least three times during the year and this
monitoring influenced the specialised management required, adjusting the timing or
extent of the cutting as and when required.
2.1.3 New sites
There is one site to be added to the Register this year and one that has been removed.
The latter, Site xx, has simply become too fragmented, damaged and degraded to
justify its retention.
The addition is not a new site but has been added due to the fact that it is the only site
in Worcestershire for Deptford pink (Dianthus armeria), a national Biodiversity
Priority Species classified as vulnerable and protected under Schedule 8 of the
Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. The site on the was formerly managed on
behalf of the Highways Agency. Further details can be found in Section 4.
There are two further sites that will be surveyed in 2008 in order to determine whether
they meet the criteria for inclusion. Both are calcareous grassland verges in the Teme
Valley.
2.2 Maintenance of Sites
2.2.1 Cutting
The summer of 2007 was notable for its almost unprecedented rainfall with severe
flooding hitting parts of the county. While this did not directly affect any of the sites it
did mean that ground conditions were sometimes unsuitable due to the potential for
damage to the sward. The result was that cutting was often delayed or rescheduled,
meaning that some sites did not receive their final cut until very late in the season.
This will have little if any effect on the overall conservation and it may indeed favour
the dropping and subsequent germination of seed, since the weather will have
inevitably had a delaying influence on flowering and ripening.
As always, there were incidents of unknown flail mowers ignoring the posts and as
always it is difficult to quantify any damage that this may have caused. Logistically
the aftermath of flailing causes considerable difficulties in raking and removing the

finely chopped litter.
2.2.2 Posts
Several of the sites are in need of posting or re-posting and these are detailed under
the relevant entry in the review of sites. One recurring problem is that on certain sites
posts go missing almost as soon as they are replaced, while on others careless or
negligent contractors ignore and/or knock over the posts and damage them, meaning
that they are difficult to reinstate. This has been an almost constant theme for several
reports and it is hoped that this problem will finally be addressed following liaison
with the new partnership units.
3. REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT / MAINTENANCE OF SITES IN 2006-07
Site x (Southern)
No problems were encountered and management proceeded as normal with an early
cut at the t-junction for visibility purposes and a later complete cut. For no obvious
reason flowering was notably less prolific this year, although this may well have been
due to the abnormally wet summer.
Site x (Southern)
No problems were encountered with the routine maintenance of this site, although the
predominantly wet weather and the nature of the vegetation meant that (apart from the
visibility strip) cutting was rescheduled twice in order to avoid churning up the
ground.
Site x
As always, few-flowered leek (Allium paradoxum) continues to flourish on this, a
non-intervention site. Again there was a small problem with the dumping of garden
refuse but the resulting damage was relatively minor. There is another minor problem
with encroaching ivy (Hedera helix) and other plants from the adjacent hedgerow,
meaning that some intervention may be required in the near future. This will be
monitored and addressed when the need arises.
Site x (Southern)
In accordance with the long-established management prescription the creeping
invasion of ivy and bramble was carefully cut back by hand as necessary and the
navelwort (Umbilicus rupestris) continued to thrive.
Site x (Southern)
Management proceeded as normal on this site with no problems encountered. The
elecampane (Inula helenium) has never been abundant but continues to flourish.
Site x (Southern)
The woodland flora on the southern slope continues to flourish with toothwort
(Lathraea squamaria) frequent this year. The northern slope continues to suffer from
invasion by coarser plants with nettle (Urtica dioca) and bramble (Rubus fruticosus
agg.) becoming an increasing problem. As always, in the absence of suitable
hedgerow management by neighbouring land owners it is difficult to see what can be
done to reverse this process, apart from continuing attempts to impede its progress.

Site x(Southern)
As always, this verge gave a spectacular display when flowering with large numbers
of butterflies and other insects also noted. There was some problem with litter, mostly
from discarded fast food wrappers and drinks cans.
Site x (Southern)
No problems were encountered with the routine management of this site and the
alexanders (Smyrnium olusatrum) continued its spread along the lane.

Site x (Southern)
Apart from the continuing (and inevitable) problem of encroachment by hogweed
(Heracleum sphondylium), blackthorn (Prunus spinosa) and bramble no problems
were encountered with the routine management of this verge, although some damage
was inflicted by vehicles running on it after the cut had been made.
Site x (Southern)
Management proceeded as normal with no major problems encountered, apart from
the excessive speed of vehicles exiting and entering the adjacent golf course.
Woodland flora on Site 33 with wood anemone, bluebell and lesser celandine
Site x (Southern)
As usual, the area around car park exit from Nature Reserve was cut
regularly for visibility and also as usual litter was a problem during the main cut with
drink cans and garden rubbish again abundant. Both of the eastern posts are still
missing.
Site x (Southern)
Routine management proceeded as normal with no problems encountered. some of the
vegetation is becoming rank as succession inevitably takes hold
Site x (Southern)
Management proceeded as prescribed with no major problems encountered. The
perennial problem of invading scrub may have to be tackled with a suitable herbicide.
Site x (Southern)
The constant efforts to control the encroaching bramble have proved only partly
successful and it is considered that the small “glade” of species-rich grassland is no
longer sustainable. Given that consideration, the site is now notable only for the shortstyled
field rose (Rosa stylosa) - which appears capable of thriving without
intervention – and therefore it is recommended that this site becomes non-intervention
unless monitoring dictates otherwise.
A slow-worm encountered on Site x

Site x (Southern)
The maintenance of this calcareous grassland proceeded as prescribed with no
problems encountered this year. A slow-worm (Anguis fragilis) was observed,
confirming that the species is still present on this site.
Site x(Southern)
Despite the efforts of a conventional contractor to flail this verge early in the year,
there was sufficient re-growth to require a complete cut in June. Both northern posts
were missing.
Site x(Southern)
Management proceeded as prescribed, although with a late and delayed cut due to the
weather conditions. Both posts are missing.
Site x (Southern)
This site was comprehensively flailed by a conventional contractor in April and again
in late July. Both posts are now missing.
Site x (Southern)
Although delayed by the wet weather management proceeded as prescribed and no
problems were encountered.
Site x(Southern)
Management proceeded as prescribed with no problems encountered. Both posts need
replacing.

Site x (Southern)
As last year, this site was flailed by a conventional contractor early in the year and
again later before we had a chance to undertake our cut. Both posts are missing
Site x(Southern)
This site has been reviewed several times to see whether there were still sufficient
remnants of the damp grassland community to justify its retention on the Register. It
was decided in 2007 that it would be retained, managed as prescribed and monitored.
Further monitoring will be undertaken in 2008, as the indications are that it does
appear to retain some botanical interest.
Site 61 (Southern)
As the last remnant of a once extensive RVNR, this verge has always seemed rather
ill fated, having been constantly subjected to “illicit” cuts by a local landowner and
subsequently damaged by the construction of a track to a fishing pool complex
then vehicle damage has occurred and sadly it seems that the final remaining tiny area
of this nationally scarce MG5 grassland no longer justifies retention on the Register.
Site x (Southern)
No problems were encountered with the routine management, although the autumn
crocus (Crocus nudiflorus) was somewhat restricted in flowering this year.
Site x (Northern)
No problems were encountered during the routine management this year. The posts
are still in need of renewal.
Site x (Southern)
This site was subjected to flailing by a conventional contractor early in the year and
then received another partial cut in August, leaving us to pick up the fine litter and cut
the remaining section. Both posts are missing.
Site x (Northern)
No problems were encountered during the management of this site, although the cut
was somewhat late due to the delays caused by the wet summer.
Site x (Northern)
Management proceeded as normal, including the annual attempt at keeping back the
bramble. All of the posts are in need of renewal.
Six-spot burnet moth on Site x
Site x (Southern)
Management this year proceeded as prescribed and no problems were encountered.
Site x (Northern)
This small site was flailed early in the year and there was insufficient re-growth to
require a further cut. It is still in need of posts.
Site 82 (Southern)
As has become the norm, this site was flailed early in the year and then again before
we were able to take our later cut. The consequent deterioration of the site due to
nutrification is becoming evident. Both posts are missing, although experience has
shown that even when in place they were ignored and have even been flattened on one
occasion.
Site x (Southern)
Management proceeded as prescribed with no problems encountered. Both posts are
now missing.
Site x (Southern)
No major problems were encountered during the prescribed management, apart from
the amount of litter. This is mostly fast food packaging and no doubt originates within

nearbyxxxxxx.
The eastern post is now partially hidden by encroaching elm suckers and since the
area of floristic interest does not reach that far it is considered that a new post could
be installed, shortening this site by approximately 15 metres.
Site x(Southern)
No problems were encountered with the management of this verge. The southern post
still requires replacement and the northern one requires re-locating approximately
50m to the south.
Site x(Southern)
No problems were encountered this year. It is pleasing to note that the number of
common spotted orchids (Dactylorhiza fuchsii) was up this year.
Site x(Southern)
The last report noted that this site was to be re-assessed in 2007 in order to ascertain
whether it justified remaining on the Register.
Sadly, monitoring revealed a further decrease in its botanical interest and it has
therefore been removed from the Register.
Site x (Southern)
No problems were encountered with the routine management of this site. All of the
posts need replacing.
Site x(Southern)
No problems were encountered during the management but it is sad to report that after
5 years this site has not recovered from the damage caused by ditching in 2002 and
parts of the verge are now completely overgrown by rank, coarse vegetation where
once a rich grassland flora grew. Both posts are now missing after being flattened by
a flail mower in recent years.
Site x (Southern)
Management proceeded as prescribed with no problems encountered.
Site x (Southern)
No major problems encountered on this site and the amount of grass cuttings dumped
by the adjacent house-owners was noticeably less this year.
Site x (Southern)
No problems were encountered on this site, which still requires posts.
Site x ((Southern)
Routine management was completed with no problems encountered, although once
again the cut was taken rather later than scheduled due to the wet summer.
Site x (Southern)
The site, which is still not posted, was completely flailed twice and consequently
there was no requirement to take a cut at the correct time.
Sites xx & x(Northern)
Due to their distinctive nature these three verges are normally dealt with as a group.
As three of only nine sites in Worcestershire - and of only thirty-five sites in the UK -
that support the Nationally Endangered tower mustard (Arabis glabra) they are
important on a national scale. All three of the verges are Special Wildlife Sites, based
solely on the criteria that they support important colonies of a single species.
Site x
In keeping with the established management regime the site was cut in late December
with another attempt to restrict the encroaching bramble. Over a hundred first-year
rosettes were counted. There is a need to control the encroachment of suckering
English elm (Ulmus procera) and this will be undertaken in 2008.

Site x This site is one where tower mustard has always been rare and this year no flowering
spikes could be found, although later in the year two first-year rosettes were
discovered. It appears that the bank has been subject to nutrification by
agricultural run-off and this is almost certainly boosting the growth of coarse weeds
such as nettle and bramble. The result is that the tower mustard cannot compete and if
it germinates at all it is crowded out. However, as one of only thirty-five sites
nationally it is vital that the species maintains a foothold, albeit a precarious one.
Rosy earthstar fruiting body
Site xAn interesting record for this site was the rosy earthstar (Geastrum rufescens)
discovered during cutting in December. This fungus is poorly recorded but appears to
have a scattered distribution in Worcestershire and had not been recorded from the
area before.
Yet again this verge held good numbers of flowering spikes and equally high numbers
of first-year rosettes. There are signs that the bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) is
increasing and some control measures will be essential. Whether this is in the form of
mechanical or chemical control has yet to be established.
Site x (Southern)
No problems were encountered this year and the very rare bithynian vetch (Vicia
bithyinica) continues to flourish.
Site x (Southern)
The very rare green-flowered helleborines (Epipactis phyllanthes) and the
uncommon broad-leaved helleborines were not found this year but as previously
noted both these species can be erratic in their flowering. The site is suffering from
vehicle damage as well as scrub and bramble encroachment.
Site x (Southern)
This is a non-intervention verge and it is monitored regularly. The dwarf elder
(Sambucus ebulus) continues to flourish. The posts on the southern side are not
required as this site is only on the northern side of the xx
Site x(Southern)
After our careful attempts to create a mosaic of long and short vegetation, resulting in
a chessboard pattern, the posts were ignored and a conventional contractor flailed the
entire site early in the year. It is difficult to quantify exactly the effect that this had on
the glow-worms but such management is undoubtedly detrimental. In addition,
attempts to make night-time counts were hampered by the wet weather during the
active season.
Monitoring will therefore be undertaken over the active period during summer 2008.
Male glow-worm displaying at night on Site x

4 ADDITIONS TO THE INVENTORY OF SITES
There is one proposed new site for this year.
This is a site that was previously maintained by the Highways Agency. This is
the only site in the county for Deptford pink (Dianthus armeria), a national
Biodiversity Priority Species classified as vulnerable and protected under Schedule 8
of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
Previous management has seen some potential disasters, including dumping tarmac
scalpings on the verge and cutting the Deptford pink flower heads off. Despite this the
plant still clings on and given its conservation status it is imperative that this site must
be conserved. If accepted this will become Site xx. It is included under a) of the
selection criteria and is clearly a priority site.

A copy of the Highways Agency Species action Plan is included in Appendix 2.
SITE NO. : x
MAP REF. : ROAD NO.
PARISH : DIVISION : SOUTHERN
VERGE LENGTH : 360 METRES
VERGE AREA : 1400 SQUARE METRES approx.
SIDE OF THE CARRIAGEWAY : EASTERN
INTERESTS:
The only county site for Deptford pink (Dianthus armeria), classified nationally as
vulnerable, a national Biodiversity Priority Species and protected under Schedule 8
of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
MANAGEMENT PRESCRIPTION:
Control scrub, bramble and rank vegetation. Monitor regularly. Install posts. Inform
conventional contractors
APPENDIX 1
Criteria for selection of Roadside Verge Nature Reserves
a) It supports a species which is classified as critically endangered, endangered,
vulnerable, near threatened or nationally scarce in the National or County Red
Data Book or very rare, rare, very scarce or scarce (as defined by Day 2001)
b) It supports a viable population of a plant that is uncommon in the county (as
defined by Day 2001)
c) It supports a particularly large and/or attractive colony of a plant(s) which, whilst
not rare or uncommon, is distinctive in a county context and/or contributes to the
county biodiversity
d) It supports a good example of a plant community that represents a habitat
characteristic of Worcestershire or is a Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Habitat
e) It supports any animal species protected under European or National legislation or
supports a rare animal species or rich community of animals in the context of the
county’s fauna
The above criteria were re-written in 2002 in order to rationalise and bring up to date
the initial criteria from 1995. The sites on the Register include those selected under
the old criteria as well as new ones added since the update.
Appendix 2
The Highways Agency Species Action Plan – Deptford Pink