Ms Amanda Dunckley
Freedom of Information Section
Nottinghamshire Police
Telephone:- 0115 9672507
Facsimile:- 0115 9672896
E-mail: [email address]
[FOI #8423 email]
11th June 2009
Dear Ms Dunckley
Request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)
Reference No: FOI09-2162
I write in connection with your request for information dated 22nd April 2009, which was received by Nottinghamshire Police on 23rd April 2009, and acknowledged by e-mail on 23rd April 2009. I note you seek access to the following information:-
1) How many dogs have been seized by Nottinghamshire police under
Section One of the Dangerous Dogs Act in each year from 2000 to
2008?
2) How many prosecutions under Section One and Section Three of the
Dangerous Dogs Act did the Nottinghamshire police proceed with in
2007 and 2008?
3)How many dogs have been seized under Section One of the Dangerous Dogs Act so far this year (2009)? Of those seized, how many have
been signed over for destruction by their owners?
4) How many applications have been made to the magistrates court
under section 4b of the Dangerous Dogs Act in the last three years?
Of those 4b applications, how many resulted in destruction orders
and how many resulted in registration onto the Index of Exempted
Dogs?
5) How many dogs are currently held under Section One and Section
Three of the Dangerous Dogs Act?
6) What number of dogs seized under Section One of the Dangerous
Dogs Act over the last three years, have been destroyed or have
died whilst in police custody, due to illness, injury or disease?
7) How many dogs held as stray dogs in council kennels have been
breed identified (to determine if they are prohibited types as
defined by the Dangerous Dogs Act) by Nottinghamshire Police?
Following receipt of your request searches were conducted within Nottinghamshire Police to locate information relevant to your request.
Decision
Please see enclosed response
Complaints Rights
Your attention is drawn to the enclosed review procedure, which details your right of complaint.
Copyright
Nottinghamshire Police in complying with their statutory duty under Sections 1 and 11 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) to release the enclosed information will not breach the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
However, the rights of the copyright owner of the enclosed information will continue to be protected by law. Applications for the copyright owner's written permission to reproduce any part of the attached information should be addressed to the Force Solicitor, Nottinghamshire Police, Force Headquarters, Sherwood Lodge, Arnold, Nottinghamshire, NG5 8PP.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in Nottinghamshire Police.
Should you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please write or contact the Freedom of Information Officer on telephone number 0115 9672507 or e-mail [email address] quoting the above reference number.
Yours sincerely
Freedom of Information Officer
Enc
RESPONSE
Under S 1 (1) (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), I can confirm that Nottinghamshire Police does hold the information you have requested.
1) How many dogs have been seized by Nottinghamshire police under
Section One of the Dangerous Dogs Act in each year from 2000 to
2008?
None.
2) How many prosecutions under Section One and Section Three of the
Dangerous Dogs Act did the Nottinghamshire police proceed with in
2007 and 2008?
Section One and Section Three - No information held this would be held with the Courts.
3)How many dogs have been seized under Section One of the Dangerous Dogs Act so far this year (2009)? Of those seized, how many have
been signed over for destruction by their owners?
None.
4) How many applications have been made to the magistrates court
under section 4b of the Dangerous Dogs Act in the last three years?
Of those 4b applications, how many resulted in destruction orders
and how many resulted in registration onto the Index of Exempted
Dogs?
This information will be held by the Courts.
5) How many dogs are currently held under Section One and Section
Three of the Dangerous Dogs Act?
Section one - None
Section three - None
6) What number of dogs seized under Section One of the Dangerous
Dogs Act over the last three years, have been destroyed or have
died whilst in police custody, due to illness, injury or disease?
Non-applicable
7) How many dogs held as stray dogs in council kennels have been
breed identified (to determine if they are prohibited types as
defined by the Dangerous Dogs Act) by Nottinghamshire Police?
No information held, this would be held by the Local Authority.