This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request '2005 Correspondence between Home Office and BERR/DBIS concerning 121Media/Phorm'.
Information Access Team 
Shared Services Directorate 
  2 Marsham Street, London  SW1P 4DF 
Switchboard 020 7035 4848   
E-mail: [email address] Website: www.homeoffice.gov.uk 
 
Phillip Main 
[FOI #45890 email]
2 September 2010 
 
Dear Mr Main, 
 
Freedom of Information request â€“ our ref: 15946 
 
I write in response to your Freedom of Information Act request of 31 August 
2010 relating to 121media and Phorm. 
We have considered your request and we consider it to be vexatious when 
considered in conjunction with the previous requests you have submitted on 
this topic.  Section 14(1) of the Act provides that the Home Office is not 
obliged to comply with a request for information of this nature if it is 
considered as vexatious.   
 
We have decided that these requests are vexatious because, in our view, it 
meets with the criteria laid out by the Information Commissioner’s Office. A 
copy of this guidance can be found here –  
 
http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detail
ed_specialist_guides/awareness_guidance_22_vexatious_and_repeated_req
uests_final.pdf
If you are dissatisfied with this response you may request an independent 
internal review of our handling of your request by submitting a complaint 
within two months to the address below, quoting the relevant reference 
number above.  
 
Information Access Team 

Home Office 
Ground Floor, Seacole Building 
2 Marsham Street 
London  
SW1P 4DF 

 
Alternatively, you can email:  [email address]
As part of any internal review the Department's handling of your information 
request wil  be reassessed by staff who were not involved in providing you 
with this response. If you remain dissatisfied after this internal review, you 
would have a right of complaint to the Information Commissioner as 
established by section 50 of the Freedom of Information Act.  
 
Please also note that, should we consider that any future requests on this 
topic to also be vexatious, we will not respond to them.  
 
Yours sincerely, 
 
L. Fisher