This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Iceland Banks - internal investigation'.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
copyright 
FINAL AUDIT REPORT 
 
 

London   
TREASURY MANAGEMENT AUDIT 2008/2009 
 
Borough 
 
 
 

of 
Auditor:  
Hillingdon
Draft Issued: 16TH FEBRUARY 2009 
Final Issued: 17TH FEBRUARY 2009 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Internal Audit Service 
 
1S/05  
Civic Centre 
High St 
Uxbridge 
UB8 1UW
 
 
 
 
 

link to page 3 link to page 3 link to page 5 link to page 5 link to page 5 link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 6 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 8 TREASURY MANAGEMENT AUDIT 2008/2009 
Contents 
 
1.  INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................3 
2.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................3 
3.  TREASURY MANAGEMENT PRACTICE, PROCEDURES AND STRATEGY.5 
4.  INVESTMENTS AND LBH FRAMEWORK..............................................................5 
5.   RECORDS AND MONITORING OF INVESTMENT.............................................5 
6.  RECONCILIATION. .....................................................................................................5 
7.  ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF FUND.....................................................................6 
8.  SECURITY OF INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS............................................6 
9.  LOANS...........................................................................................................................7 
10.  ICELANDIC BANK INVESTMENTS .........................................................................7 
APPENDIX A – ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................8 
 
 
 
copyright 
 
 
 
 
 
London 
 
 
 
 
Borough 
 
 
 
 
 
of 
 
Hillingdon
 
 
 
 
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
 
 
Internal Audit would like to thank the Investment Manager, Pension Fund 
Accountant, Accounts assistant and all other officers contacted during the course 
of this review for their co-operation and assistance during the audit. 
 

TREASURY MANAGEMENT AUDIT 2008/2009 
  
 
1. 
INTRODUCTION 
 
1.1.  This Treasury Management (TM) audit was undertaken to provide 
management with an assurance that the processes and controls relating to loans 
and investment of surplus funds within the Capital and Treasury Management 
section are adequate and effective. The audit brief, which provided the objectives, 
methodology and scope, was issued on 2nd October 2008. 
1.2.  Furthermore, the audit was to evaluate whether monies placed with the 
Icelandic banks were made in accordance with the London Borough of Hillingdon’s 
operating framework. 
 
 
2. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
copyright 
 
2.1. 
Overall Audit’s view is that we are able to give Satisfactory Assurance 
that the controls in place to for Treasury Management are effective. A definition 
of the assurance level and risk categories is available on the intranet in the 
internal audit pages.  
London 
 
2.2. 
The following areas were reviewed and found to be operating satisfactorily: 
  The Council has a Treasury Management Strategy Statement and Annual 
Investment Strategy 2008/09, a Treasury Management Policy and Treasury 
Borough 
Management Practices that are detailed and properly documented. They have 
been determined and approved by appointed committee /Investment panel and 
are reviewed periodically. 
  There is adequate separation of duties in the Treasury Management’s day-to-
of 
day operations. 
Hillingdon
  Reconciliations relating to both investments and loans are adequately and 
regularly carried out. 
  Investments and electronic transfers/payments are properly authorised, 
checked and monitored. 
  A detailed, up to date Loan Register is maintained with access restricted. 
  Adequate Fidelity insurance cover is in place for all treasury members of staff. 
  The Council’s External Treasury Management Advisers/consultants complied 
with their contract of engagement and there performance was satisfactory. 
  The deposits made with the Icelandic Banks complied with the London 
Borough of Hillingdon’s Investment Framework. 
 
2.3. 
The areas of concern resulting from the audit were:  
  The daily Cash Flow statements and monthly reconciliations of 
investment/loan records do not indicate who prepared them. 
 
 
3
Page  

TREASURY MANAGEMENT AUDIT 2008/2009 
  
  It is difficult to determine the names of signatories that had signed “The 
Payment Transit Forms” because names were not printed against their 
signatures.  
  Files containing important Treasury Management documents such as daily 
cash flow statements and dealing forms are left on the desk overnight.  
  An approved procedure for collection of unpaid investments is not in place. 
 
2.4.  Detailed audit findings are set out from section three onwards. 
Recommendations in respect of each area are set out in italics  and bold at the 
end of each section and a rationale follows each recommendation.  The 
recommendations are also brought together in Appendix A. 
copyright 
London 
Borough 
of Hillingdon
 
 
4
Page  

TREASURY MANAGEMENT AUDIT 2008/2009 
  
 
3. 
TREASURY MANAGEMENT PRACTICE, PROCEDURES AND STRATEGY 
 

3.1. 
The Council has a Treasury Management Strategy Statement and Annual 
Investment Strategy 2008/09, a Treasury Management Policy and Treasury 
Management Practices that are detailed and properly documented. The Treasury 
Management Strategy Statement and Annual Investment Strategy was approved 
by the Council on 28 February 2008 and are reviewed periodically. 
3.2. 
The procedures and Treasury Management Practices provide for adequate 
separation of duties. 
 
 
4. 
COUNTER PARTY LIST AND DAILY CASH FLOW 
 
copyright 
4.1. There is a comprehensive and adequately approved Counter Party List, which 
contains the names and limits of each institution where the Council can invest its 
fund. This record is updated regularly.   
4.2. The daily Cash Flow is satisfactorily computed, reviewed and signed by the 
London 
Treasury Manager. However, it is not signed by the preparer. 
Recommendation 
1)  The preparer of the daily Cash Flow statements should print and sign 

their name as evidence of who prepared the statements. 
Borough 
 
Rationale 
It would be difficult to identify who prepared the statements if there were any 
queries at a later date. There is also no audit trail.
 
of 
 
Hillingdon
5.  
RECORDS AND MONITORING OF INVESTMENT 
 
5.1.    Investments are properly and accurately recorded in the appropriate 
treasury books. 
5.2.   Access to the Electronic Investment Register is restricted and the register is 
satisfactorily maintained. 
5.3. There are manual procedures in place to monitor investment maturity, but the 
Logotech system, used for investment and loan management, does not alert the 
TM Team of loan repayments and investment maturity dates in advance. Although 
there are compensating controls in place by using the daily diary, it would be good 
practice to have an electronic alert. However, at the moment, the logotech system 
cannot be configured to do this  
 
6. 
RECONCILIATIONS 
 
6.1.  The Council’s main accounting records are regularly reconciled to the 
investment register and the register is reconciled with financial institutions’ 
statements.    
 
 
5
Page  

TREASURY MANAGEMENT AUDIT 2008/2009 
  
6.2. 
A senior officer reviews and signs the reconciliations statements, but they 
are not signed by the preparer. 
Recommendation 
2) The preparer of the reconciliations statements should print and sign their 
name as evidence of who prepared the reconciliation statements. 
 
Rationale 
It would be difficult to identify who prepared the statements if there were any 
queries at a later date. There is also no audit trail.
 
 
 
 
7. 
ELECTRONIC TRANSFERS OF FUNDS  
copyright 
 
7.1.   The controls that are in place for the electronic transfer of fund are 
satisfactory with transfers and payments being checked, authorised and 
monitored.  
7.2. 
A regularly updated signatory list is in place.  
London 
7.3. Signatories on Payment Transit Forms were confirmed to the signatory list, 
but it was difficult, in some instances, to determine the signatory’s name from just 
looking at the Payment Transit Form. Borough 
Recommendation 
3) It is recommended that signatories signing the Payment Transit Forms 
should print their names against their signature 

Rationale 
of 
It would be difficult to identify who authorise the Payment Transit Forms if there 
Hillingdon
were any queries at a later date.  
 
8. 
FIDELITY GUARANTEE INSURANCE  
 
8.1.   The Fidelity Guarantee Insurance Policy in place is adequate.  
 
 
9. 
SECURITY OF INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS 
 
9.1. 
Access to the TM’s electronic information and registers is restricted by login 
ID’s and passwords, and non-use of the system is monitored so that ID’s can be 
disabled. 
 
9.2.  The Council has a robust data retention policy accessible to all staff on 
Horizon.  
9.3.  Files containing hard copies of some sensitive information such as cash 
flow statements and reconciliations are kept in unlocked drawers.  
 
 
6
Page  

TREASURY MANAGEMENT AUDIT 2008/2009 
  
 
Recommendation 
4) 
Files containing Treasury Management day-to-day information should 
be kept in lockable cabinets or scanned into the system. 
Rationale 
           Information  may  fraudulently  be  used  to  misappropriate  monies  or  information 
may be used to embarrass the Council. 
 
10. 
LOANS 
 
10.1.  A detailed Loan Register is in place and the Loan Procedure is detailed, 
clear, and fit for purpose and there are controls in place to ensure that risky loans 
are not taken. 
copyright 
 
11. 
ICELANDIC BANK INVESTMENTS 
 
11.1.  The Council’s TM operating framework is sound, robust and satisfactory.   
London 
11.2.  The deposits that were made with the Heritable Bank Plc and Landsbanki 
in August and September 2008, totalling £20 million, were made in accordance 
with the London Borough of Hillingdon’s TM Operation Framework. 
11.3. The Council’s External Treasury Management Advisers/consultants 
Borough 
complied with their contract of engagement and their performance was 
satisfactory. 
11.4.  The response of the TM Team of reporting to the Chief Executive, Chair of 
the Audit Committee and Leader on the funds, completing claim forms and 
of 
stopping further investments in all Icelandic banks, was satisfactory. 
Hillingdon
11.5.  However, there is no laid down procedure in the Annual Treasury Practice 
that indicates step by step action to be taken in case of non payment of deposits 
when matured.   
 
Recommendation   
5) It is recommended that unpaid investment recovery procedures should be 
put in place.
 
Rationale 
Lack of procedures may result in the Council losing monies. 
 
 
7
Page  

TREASURY MANAGEMENT AUDIT 2008/2009 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

copyright 
 
 
 
APPENDIX A – ACTION PLAN 

 
London 
 
Rec 
Recommendation Rationale Risk 
Management response  
Person 
No. 
category 
(including statement of agreement/disagreement) 
responsible 
and time scale 


The preparer of the daily Cash  It would be difficult to 
Low 
Agreed:  
 
Borough 
Flow statements should print identify who prepared 
Procedures will be updated to include  31/03/09 
details of the person preparing the 
and sign their name as evidence  the statements if there 
daily cash flow statement. 
of who prepared the statements. 
were any queries at a 
later date. There is also 
no audit trail.
 
of Hillingdon
 

The preparer of the 
It would be difficult to  Medium 
Agreed:  
31/03/09 
reconciliations statements 
identify who prepared 
The preparer of monthly 
reconciliations will state and sign 

should print and sign their name  the statements if there 
their name.  
as evidence of who prepared the  were any queries at a 
reconciliation statements. 

later date. There is also 
 
no audit trail. 
 

It is recommended that 
It would be difficult to 
Medium 
Agreed: 
31/03/09 
signatories signing the Payment  identify who authorise 
A template will be created and 
transposed onto the payment 

transit Form should print their  the Payment Transit 
 
 

Page  

TREASURY MANAGEMENT AUDIT 2008/2009 
  
Rec 
Recommendation Rationale Risk 
Management response  
Person 
No. 
category 
(including statement of agreement/disagreement) 
responsible 
and time scale 

names against their signature 
Form if there were any 
document. It will incorporate the 
queries at a later date.  
names of signatories to facilitate the 
 
simplification and verification of the 
signing process. 
Sample signatures 
will be provided to those involved in 

copyright 
the final payment approval stage to 
allow validation.  


Files containing Treasury 
Information may 
Medium Agreed: 
31/03/09 
Management day-to-day 
fraudulently be used to 
The current Daily Cash Flow folder 
will be locked away overnight.  

information should be kept in  misappropriate monies 
London 
lockable cabinets or scanned or information may be 
into the system.
 
used to embarrass the 
Council.
 
 

It is recommended that unpaid  Lack of procedures may 
High Agreed: 
30/04/09 
Borough 
investment recovery procedures  result in the Council 
Procedures relating to unpaid 
investments will be included within 

should be put in place. 
losing monies 
the next update to the Treasury 
Management Practices 

 
 
 
 
 
 
of 
 
Hillingdon
 
 
 
COMPILED BY: ____________________________________ 
 
SIGNED AS AGREED: ____________________________________ 
(Auditor) 
   

 
 
       DESIGNATION: 
_________________________________________ 
 
          DATE: 

_________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 

Page  

Document Outline