This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Bloody Sunday Parade'.
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
22 March 2010 
 
 
 
Your Ref: 
 
 
 
 
Our Ref: 
0133/2010 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mr Alastair Manderson 
 
 
Force Disclosure Unit 
Email: [FOI #29508 email]
Police Headquarters 
173 Pitt Street 
GLASGOW 
G2 4JS 
 
Tel: 0141 435 1217 
 
Fax: 0141 435 1218 
 
Dear Mr Manderson 
 
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NUMBER 0133/2010 
 
I refer to your request for information dated 21 February 2010, which was received by 
Strathclyde Police on 22 February 2010.  
 
Your request for information has now been considered and on 22 March 2010, a decision was 
made to provide some of the information requested by you.  Some of the information 
requested by you is, however, considered to be exempt in terms of the Freedom of 
Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (the Act).  Section 16 of the Act requires Strathclyde Police 
to provide you with a notice which: (a) states that it holds the information, (b) states that it is 
claiming an exemption, (c) specifies the exemption in question and (d) states, if that would 
not be otherwise apparent, why the exemption applies. Where information is considered to be 
exempt, this letter serves as a Refusal Notice and an explanation of the appropriate exemption 
is provided.   
 
For ease of reference, I have provided a response to each of the questions posed by you, as 
detailed below. 
 
Could you provide me with the policing costs for the following parade by the West of 
Scotland Band alliance which proposed the following route: Shamrock Street, Scott Street, 
West Graham, Cowcaddens Road, North Hanover Street, Kyle Street, Baird Street, Royston 
Road, Glenbarr Street, Rhymer Street, Tharsis Street, Roystonhill, Rosemount Street. 
 
(Organisation West of Scotland Band Alliance, Date of Procession Sunday 21 February 
2010, Start Time of Outward Route 10.30am) 
 
The cost of policing this parade is £29,865.75 
 
Could you also tell me how many police officers were involved in protecting the WOSBA 
and the general public from each other? 
 
In relation to the number of officers deployed at this event, this information is exempt for the 
following reasons. 
 
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
Section 35 (1) (a) and (b) – Law Enforcement 
 
The information requested is exempt as its disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice 
substantially the prevention or detection of crime and apprehension or prosecution of 
offenders.  This West of Scotland Bands Alliance parade on Sunday 21 February 2010 and 
similar such parades are regularly policed by this Force.  If the number of police officers 
involved in policing a parade was disclosed, experience has shown that it would allow those 
intent on committing crime or disorder at such events to gauge the likelihood of detection or 
to take measures to negate the likelihood of detection.  The disclosure of the information will 
also allow criminals to plan how to disrupt future parades or events of a similar nature and 
also how best to engage or occupy existing police resources within the area of the parade to 
maximise their chances of committing serious crime elsewhere.  As a service we have 
considerable experience of this where organised criminal groups create diversionary calls to 
divert police resources.  In a similar vain we have evidence that criminals actively target such 
events especially if police numbers are considered to be low.  While it could be argued that 
such criminal activity takes place without the numbers being known, it is reasonable to 
assume that confirmation of the number of officers involved would assist such activity by 
allowing more accurate judgements to be made by criminals therefore harming the efficient 
and effective conduct of the service. 
 
 
Section 39 (1) – Health, safety and the environment 
 
The disclosure of the information requested would or would be likely to endanger the physical 
health or safety of an individual.  As previously described, to disclose police capability, 
would allow those persons intent on committing crime or causing disorder to gauge the 
likelihood of detection or to take measures to negate the likelihood of detection.  This would 
leave participants of the parade and members of the public at an increased risk of being the 
victim of crime and jeopardise wider community safety.  This could also lead to an increase in 
the number of attacks on operational police officers by those being arrested or who have 
committed crime. 
 
 
Public Interest Test 
 
As you will be aware, the exemptions listed above are non-absolute and require the 
application of the Public Interest Test.  I would suggest that public accountability would 
favour disclosure as the information requested concerns the efficient and effective use of 
resources by the Force.  Secondly, disclosure of the information would also contribute 
accurate information to the public debate on the issue of policing.  That said I would contend 
that the need to ensure the effective conduct of the Force in relation to prevention and 
detection of crime and, the public safety considerations involved in policing favour non-
disclosure of the requested information.  On balance I would contend that public interest in 
disclosing the information is outweighed by that of maintaining the exemptions listed, as the 
maintenance of a safe and just society is a fundamental duty of the police. 
 
 
Could you also provide me with any and all arrest figures and fines issued as a result of 
this parade? 
 
I can advise that there were no arrests during this event. 
 
 
 
 
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
I hope this information is helpful, however, if you are not satisfied with the way in which 
your request has been dealt with, you are entitled in the first instance to request a review of 
the decision made by the Force.  Should you wish to request such a review, please write to 
Mrs Sheena Brennan, Disclosure Manager at the above address within 40 working days of 
receiving this letter.  Once informed of the Review Panel’s decision, if you are still not 
satisfied, then you are entitled to apply to the Scottish Information Commissioner within six 
months for a decision.  Contact details are; Office of the Scottish Information Commissioner, 
Kinburn Castle, Doubledykes Road, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9DS, telephone 01334 464610.  
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in Strathclyde Police.   
 
Should you require any further assistance concerning this matter please contact me directly on 
0141 435 1217 quoting the reference number given. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
Susan McGinlay 
Sergeant 
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED