This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Discipline'.
 
 
 
4th March 2010 
 
 
 
Mr Adrian Rutherford 
Freedom of Information Unit  
 
2nd Floor 
[FOI #25293 email] 
Royal Mail Sheffield 
 
Pond Street 
request–25294[email address] 
Sheffield 
 
S98 6HR 
 
 
 
[Royal Mail Group request email] 
 
www.royalmail.com 
 
 
Dear Mr Rutherford 
 
Requests under Freedom of Information Act 2000 –  
(1) Disciplinary action against Royal Mail staff in Northern Ireland; and 
(2) Thefts by Royal Mail staff 
 
Request for Internal Reviews 
 
I am writing in response to your email dated 4th February 2010 in which you requested an 
internal review of the Royal Mail decision to withhold information in relation to your above 
requests.  The internal review panel has now assessed your request and I am writing to 
advise you of its decision.   
 
In order to explain the panel’s decision, it is necessary to recap on the four requests you 
made on 4th January 2010.   
 
The four requests were as follows: 
 
First request: 
“Please provide details of all disciplinary action taken against Royal Mail employees in 
Northern Ireland in each of the last three years (2007-2009).  For each incident, please 
provide 1. the date 2. the town/city/location where the employee was based 3. the 
employee’s position (i.e. manager, postman etc) 4. details of the offence/misconduct 5. what 
punishment/action was taken 6. where an employee was suspended, detail for how long, 
and how much was he/she paid while on suspension.” 
 
Royal Mail Group Ltd is registered in England and Wales. Registered number 4138203. Registered office: 100 Victoria Embankment, London, EC4Y 0HQ. 
 
© Royal Mail Group Ltd 2010– Page 1 of 4 
 

 
Cont… 
 
Second request: 
“Please provide details of all thefts by Royal Mail employees in Northern Ireland in each of 
the last three years.  Please provide the date, location of the theft, details of the 
incident/what was taken (especially if mail was stolen), whether these items were recovered, 
and what punishment or disciplinary action followed.” 
 
Third request: 
“Please provide details where mail was delivered to the wrong address in Northern Ireland. 
State how many times this occurred in each of the last three years, including a breakdown 
with the date, details of the intended location and the location where the mail was 
mistakenly sent to, and what (if any) disciplinary action was taken. Please also detail what, if 
any, compensation was paid for each incident.” 
 
Fourth request: 
“Please provide details where items were lost in the post in Northern Ireland. State how 
many times this occurred in each of the last three years, including a breakdown with the 
date, details of what went missing, whether it was subsequently found and sent on to 
the affected customer, and what (if any) disciplinary action was taken. Please also detail 
what, if any, compensation was paid for each incident.” 
 
Royal Mail refused disclosure of information in relation to your third and fourth requests on 
the basis that for each request the identification, retrieval, extraction and collation of the 
relevant information would exceed the statutory limit on costs in section 12 of the Freedom 
of Information Act (the FOIA).  The statutory limit for Royal Mail is £450, which equates to 
18 hours of staff time (this is because staff time must be costed at £25 per hour regardless 
of grade). 
 
Section 12 and the Freedom of Information and Data Protection (Appropriate Limit and 
Fees) Regulations 2004 made under it state that where an applicant submits more than 
one request for information to the same public body in the space of 60 working days and 
those requests relate to any extent to the same or similar information, the public body may 
aggregate the cost of complying with the requests in total when considering whether the 
cost limit is exceeded.  This means that if someone makes multiple requests within a short 
space of time and those requests are in any way similar to each another, when calculating 
the cost of compliance Royal Mail can look at the cost of complying with al  the requests 
together, rather than one at a time. 
 
The internal review panel considered that your four requests shared strong similarities in 
that (i) they all relate to Northern Ireland (ii) they all ask questions about disciplinary action 
Royal Mail Group Ltd is registered in England and Wales. Registered number 4138203. Registered office: 100 Victoria Embankment, London, EC4Y 0HQ. 
 
© Royal Mail Group Ltd 2010– Page 2 of 4 
 

 
Cont… 
 
against Royal Mail members of staff and (iii) they all ask questions relating to the quality of 
service by Royal Mail.  They can therefore be taken together when considering the costs 
limit for compliance. 
 
Given that your third and fourth requests alone exceeded the costs limit, clearly the 
estimated time for responding to all four requests taken together would also exceed the 
cost limit for compliance.  Therefore the information you requested is exempt from 
disclosure by Royal Mail under section 12 of the Act. 
 
Under the Act, Royal Mail has a duty to assist you to narrow down your request so that 
comes below the cost of compliance limit.  The Information Commissioner has made clear 
that it is not for us to try and guess which parts of the information you have requested you 
would like to prioritise.    
 
I can advise you that if you were to submit a new, stand-alone request for information 
relating to disciplinary actions, that information could be identified within the cost limit.  On 
top of this, we could also identify the information relating to thefts within the cost of 
compliance limit.  However, you would need to notify us that you are not pursuing your 
other two requests further before we process the thefts and disciplinary requests.  
 
As you are aware from our initial responses to your requests focussing on thefts and 
disciplinary action, Royal Mail is of the view that other exemptions apply to the information 
that you have requested.  To be clear, even if your request fal s below the cost of compliance 
exemption, it is possible that other exemptions may apply.  Royal Mail would consider such 
exemptions if/ when you submit a narrower request that falls below the cost of compliance 
limit.  The appeal panel did not consider in detail any exemptions other than section 12. 
 
I hope that this suitably explains our reasons for withholding the information in response to 
your request.  However, in the event that you are not satisfied with this reply (in particular 
our application of the cost of compliance exemption), you do of course have the right to 
appeal to the Information Commissioner, the address for whom is: 
Information Commissioner’s Office 
Wycliffe House 
Water Lane 
Wilmslow 
Cheshire 
SK9 5AF 
Telephone: 01625 545 700 
www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk 
Royal Mail Group Ltd is registered in England and Wales. Registered number 4138203. Registered office: 100 Victoria Embankment, London, EC4Y 0HQ. 
 
© Royal Mail Group Ltd 2010– Page 3 of 4 
 

 
Cont… 
 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
Colin Young 
Freedom of Information Manager 
[Royal Mail Group request email] 
 
Royal Mail Group Ltd is registered in England and Wales. Registered number 4138203. Registered office: 100 Victoria Embankment, London, EC4Y 0HQ. 
 
© Royal Mail Group Ltd 2010– Page 4 of 4