Minutes of the Executive Team meeting 
 
17 December 2009 
 
Present:  
Peter Wardle (PW) (Chair) 
Chief Executive  
Clare Ettinghausen (CE) 
Deputy Chief Executive 
Stephen Rooney (SR) 
Director of Communication 
Carolyn Hughes (CH) (Chair)  Director of Party and Election Finance 
Andrew Scallan (AS) 
Director of Electoral Administration and 
Boundaries 
Lisa Klein (LK) 
Director of Party and Election Finance  
 
In attendance: 
Louisa Parry (LP) 
  Strategy and Planning Manager (for Item 2) 
Bola Bajomo (BB) 
  Head of Finance and Procurement (for Items 2 
and 3) 
Jerome Malone (JM) 
  Policy Manager (Regulatory Reform) (for Item 
5) 
Katharine Sparrow (KS) 
  Minutes  
  1. Apologies 
 
1.1 
There were no apologies. 
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

---

 
 
   
 
  
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
 
 
 
5. 
Options for Campaign Monitoring  
 
5.1  JM presented his paper on the options for campaign monitoring at the 
forthcoming general election.  He said there were a range of options 
from doing nothing, to desk based research to a partnership approach.  
The Recommendation being put to Executive Team was a combination 
of all options (Option 5). 
 
5.2  PW said the paper was very England focused and asked for assurance 
that a consistent Commission-wide approach would be taken.  JM said 
the Devolved Heads had fed into the paper from the start; the approach 
would be consistent across the UK but an extra input of resources was 
required in England. 
 
5.3  PW requested a Management Team member be appointed to take 
responsibility for the project to ensure a consistent approach across the 
UK. 
 
5.4  PW expressed a concern that the Partnership option would lead to a 
change in the compliance objectives.  He questioned what added value 
the partnership option brought to the work of the Compliance Team.  SR 
said there were also risks associated with the partnership approach; the 
Commission would not necessarily want to be associated with the 
website.  CE suggested investigating whether any academics were 
 
2

---

planning research in this area. 
 
5.5  PW said he was not sure the benefits from the partnership approach 
outweighed the risks.  Executive Team decided the advanced desk 
research option (Option 3) was taken.  A review could then be 
undertaken after the election to identify whether this approach left any 
gaps in compliance knowledge. 
 
5.6 Executive  Team agreed the PPP should be informed of the approach 
the Commission planned to take. 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
3

---