This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Police Injury Pensions Policy'.
PROTECTIVE MARKING NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
CHIEF OFFICERS STRATEGY DAY  
 DATE OF MEETING: 9th September 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TITLE: STRATEGIC RESOURCE LEVERAGE – INJURY ON DUTY AWARDS 
 
AUTHORS: Peter Farrimond (Force Financial Manager) & Jim Spence 
(Head of Personnel Services) 
 
CHIEF OFFICER LEAD: Stephen Howarth 
 
 
SUMMARY: 
 
 
The Police Pensions Regulations 1987 (Part K) provides that a person who has 
ceased to serve as an officer and is permanently disabled as a result of an 
injury received in the execution of duty may be eligible to receive an injury 
award. The amount of the award is dependent upon the officer’s length of 
service and an assessment of the extent of the disablement and the 
corresponding loss of earning capacity, categorised into 4 ‘Degree of 
Disablement’ bands. 
 
The Regulations require Police Authorities to consider at regular intervals 
whether the degree of the pensioner's disablement has altered and to review 
the level of award payable. Home Office guidelines on the operation of the 
Injury Awards scheme suggest further reviews of the award when the ex-officer 
reaches his/her compulsory retirement age under Police Regulations and again 
when he/she reaches State Pension Age. 
 
The Home Office issued a consultation document in August 2008 in order to 
review the police injury benefits scheme which led a number of Forces to review 
their operation of the scheme. Following a review of the costs associated with 
the payment of Injury Awards to ex- West Mercia officers, it is proposed that the 
Home Office guidance on the review of Injury Awards should be fully 
implemented.     
 
 
DECISIONS REQUIRED: 
 
To support the proposals set out in this report and make recommendations to 
the Police Authority, as appropriate. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Page 1 of 7 

PROTECTIVE MARKING NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
INJURY ON DUTY AWARDS 
 
1. PURPOSE 
 
The purpose of this report is to explain the provisions of the Police 
Pension Regulations in relation to the payment and review of Injury 
Awards and to demonstrate the cost savings that can be achieved by 
fully implementing the Regulations and the guidance issued by the Home 
Office.  
 
2. BACKGROUND 
 
2.1  

Provisions of the Police Pension Regulations 1987 
 
2.1.1.  Part K2 of the Regulations state that  
 
Where an injury pension is payable under these Regulations, the 
Police Authority shall, at such intervals as may be suitable, 
consider whether the degree of the pensioner's disablement has 
altered; and if after such consideration the Police Authority find 
that the degree of the pensioner's disablement has substantially 
altered, the pension shall be revised accordingly. 
 
2.1.2.  This regulation was supplemented by  further guidance in HOC 46/2004 
 (Annex 
C): 
 
 
Once a former officer receiving an injury pension reaches what 
would have been his compulsory retirement age under the Police 
Pensions Regulations (depending on the person’s force and rank 
at the point of leaving the police service) the force should consider 
a review of the award payable, since it is no longer appropriate to 
use the former officer’s police pay scale as the basis for his or her 
pre-injury earning capacity. 
 
In the absence of a cogent reason for a higher or lower outside 
earnings level, it is suggested that the new basis for the person’s 
earning capacity, had there been no injury, should be the National 
Average Earnings at the time of the review.   
 
2.1.3. and:  
 
Once a former officer receiving an injury pension reaches the age 
of 65, they will have reached their State Pension Age irrespective 
of whether they are male or female. The force then has the 
discretion, in the absence of a cogent reason otherwise, to advise 
the SMP to place the former officer in the lowest band of Degree 
of Disablement.  At such a point, the former officer would normally 
no longer be expected to be earning a salary in the employment 
market. 
 
Page 2 of 7 

PROTECTIVE MARKING NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
 
2.2 Current practice in West Mercia Police  
 
While it has been the Force’s practice to conduct a review following the initial 
granting of an award, no further reviews have been conducted. Neither has the 
Force taken the opportunity to reduce the amount of the award by aligning it to 
National Average Earnings when recipients reach compulsory retirement age 
under the Police Pensions Regulations or placing the former officer in the 
lowest band of Degree of Disablement when he/she reaches State Pension 
Age. 
 
There are currently 189 ex-police officers and 2 ex-police staff members 
receiving Injury Awards, 21 of whom are over 65 and 77 of whom will reach age 
65 in the next 10 years. A full breakdown is shown in Appendix A.  
 
The cost of these awards to the Police Authority in 2008/09 was £1.4 million, 
and the current budget for 2009-10 is £1.5 million. If the Force’s current practice 
continues, this cost will increase year on year as the value of the awards is 
linked to current Police Officer pay rates.  
 
 
3. 
STRATEGIC ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION 
 
3.1 Compliance 

with 
Regulations and Home Office Guidelines  
 
3.1.1 The 1987 Regulations impose a duty (shall) on Police Authorities to 
regularly review the degree of a pensioner’s disablement and revise their 
pension if the disablement has substantially altered. This may result in an 
increase or decrease in the amount of the payment. Whilst the 
Regulations do not specify that the reviews should be conducted at any 
particular interval, many Police Authorities conduct regular reviews at five 
year intervals, or at shorter or longer intervals if appropriate in specific 
cases. In the past West Mercia has only conducted one review after the 
initial award was made so the initial level of payment has been maintained 
until the ex-officer’s death.  
 
3.1.2 The 2004 Home Office guidance suggests that Force’s should 
consider a review of the award payable when the ex-officer reaches the 
compulsory retirement age under the Police Pension Regulations. The 
guidance also suggests that the basis for assessing the individual’s 
earning capacity should be the National Average Earnings at the time of 
the review, rather than the former officer’s police pay scale. West Mercia 
has not conducted these reviews so the amount paid to ex-officers over 
the compulsory retirement age has continued to increase in line with police 
officer pay.   
 
3.2.3 The 2004 guidelines also give Forces the discretion, in the absence 
of a cogent reason otherwise, to place the former officer in the lowest 
band of Degree of Disablement when he/she reaches State Pension Age.  
West Mercia has not exercised this discretion so 8 ex-officers over the age 
Page 3 of 7 

PROTECTIVE MARKING NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
of 65 are currently receiving a higher level payment (7 at level 2 and 1 at 
level 4).  
 
3.2.4 If the Home Office guidelines were to be fully implemented, careful 
consideration would need to be given to whether the awards made to the 
21 ex-officers and staff who have already reached the State Pension age 
should also be reviewed. Any resulting decrease in the pension these 
individuals receive would obviously have a more dramatic impact on their 
standard of living than may be the case for younger pensioners who may 
still be employed.  
 
 

3.2 
Implications of reviewing the Awards currently paid 
  
3.2.1. Costs  
Some additional cost and staff time will be required to complete the 
reviews, the most significant of which will be the cost of Selected Medical 
Practitioner.  
 
3.2.2. Appeals from current recipients  
The changes proposed will inevitably have a detrimental impact on the 
income of current recipients of an award and it is likely that many will wish 
to appeal to the Police Medical Appeals Board. However, advice from the 
Police Federation to its members contained in JBB Circular 94/2008, is 
cautious in this regard and North Yorkshire Police have, to date, a 100% 
success rate in appeal hearings 
 
3.2.3. Unwelcome publicity  
West Yorkshire Police and Northumbria Police have fully implemented the 
Home Office Guidance, including reviewing the Injury Awards of all those 
over age 65 (see 3.2.4 above). This has caused a lot of negative publicity, 
including an article in Police Review titled ‘Great Pensions Robbery’. 
However, the negative impact of implementing these changes can be 
reduced by ensuring full consultation with local Police Federation, 
Superintendents Association and NARPO representatives.  
 
 
4. FINANCIAL 

IMPLICATIONS 
 
By fully implementing the Home Office guidance, it is estimated that the 
saving to the Police Authority could be £840K per year A full breakdown is 
shown in Appendix B. 
Page 4 of 7 

PROTECTIVE MARKING NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
5. CONCLUSION 
 
West Mercia’s operation of the regulations relating to Injury Awards has 
been over generous in the past, resulting in much higher costs to the 
Police Authority than is necessary. Under the present approach these 
costs will continue to rise in future years. Although the introduction of a 
more rigorous process will inevitably cause some anxiety and loss of 
income for some of the 191 ex-officers and staff currently receiving an 
award, the benefits to the Police Authority in terms of current and future 
cost savings are substantial.  
 
 
6. RECOMMENDATION/S1 
 

Subject to the approval of the Police Authority, it is recommended that:  
 
6.1 The Injury Awards currently paid to ex-officers and staff below the age 
of 65 be subject to review at least once every 5 years (or more frequently 
if deemed appropriate in specific cases) in accordance with the provisions 
of the Police Pension Regulations 1987.  
 
6.2 The award paid to ex-officers who reach compulsory retirement age 
under the Police Pensions Regulations be reviewed and, in the absence of 
any cogent reason for a higher or lower earnings level, be adjusted to 
reflect National Average Earnings.  
 
6.3 The Force exercise its discretion under the Regulations to place all ex-
officers and staff who reach State Pension age in the lowest band of 
Degree of Disablement, unless there is a cogent reason otherwise.  
 
                                                           
 
Page 5 of 7 

PROTECTIVE MARKING NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
APPENDIX A - CURRENT RECIPIENTS OF INJURY ON DUTY AWARDS 
 

Injury On Duty Awards - Numbers by Age and Injury Award Level
30
25
s
ard
w 20

 A
r
y
ju
n 15

r
 of I
e 10

b
Num
5
0
up to 44
45 to 49
50 to 54
55 to 59
60 to 64
65 & over
Age of Recipients as at 1st April 2009
Number of Level 1 Injury Awards
Number of Level 2 Injury Awards
Number of Level 3 Injury Awards
Number of Level 4 Injury Awards
Number of Staff & Other Injury Awards
 
 
 
Total 
Number of Injury On Duty Awards 
Number 
Age 
of Injury 
Range 
Staff & 
Level 1 
Level 2 
Level 3 
Level 4 
On Duty 
Other 
Awards 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
up to 44 

12 



17 
45 to 49 

24 



37 
50 to 54 

14 
15 


37 
55 to 59 

22 



38 
60 to 64 

20 
11 


41 
65 & over 
13 




21 
TOTAL 
37 99 43  8  4 191 
 
 
 

Total 
Annual Cost of Injury On Duty Awards 
Annual 
Age 
Cost of 
Range 
Staff & 
Injury On 
Level 1 
Level 2 
Level 3 
Level 4 
Other 
Duty 
Awards 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
up to 44 

102,500
59,612
29,519

191,631
45 to 49 
7,871 
187,507
111,748
0

307,126
50 to 54 
17,911 
98,837
167,824
12,058

296,630
55 to 59 
33,809 
145,807
62,818
10,679
479 
253,592
60 to 64 
26,745 
133,190
112,289
0
1,600 
273,824
65 & over 
40,817 
49,085
0
14,554

104,456
TOTAL 127,153 
716,926
514,291
66,810
2,079 1,427,259
Page 6 of 7 

PROTECTIVE MARKING NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 
 
APPENDIX B – ESTIMATED INJURY ON DUTY COST SAVINGS 
 
Due to the nature of the Injury On Duty Awards, it is only possible to give an 
estimation of the financial impact from the Home Office Guidance on Injury On 
Duty Awards. We took a sample of 10 of Injury On Duty Award recipients, 
making sure that this was representative of the age and award level of 
recipients. The Injury On Duty Awards were then re-calculated for a reduction to 
one level below the one they were currently receiving, except those already on 
Level 1. The following table shows the estimated annual savings that would 
result from the changes in award levels. 
 
 

Current 
Current 
‘Revised’  ‘Revised’ 
Age as at 
Injury 
Injury 
Injury On  Injury On  Estimated 
1st April 
On Duty 
On Duty 
Duty 
Duty 
Annual 
2009 
Award 
Award 
Award  
Award  
Saving 
Level 
Value 
Level 
Value 
63 1 
£5,872

£5,872 £0 
42 2 
£10,727

£5,599 
£5,128 
48 2 
£7,044
1 £807 
£6,237 
53 2 
£6,385

£0 
£6,385 
59 2 
£4,037

£0 
£4,037 
63 2 
£7,253

£3,626 
£3,627 
48 3 
£12,833

£6,973 
£5,860 
51 3 
£13,364

£6,597 
£6,767 
60 3 
£10,232

£6,821 
£3,411 
51 4 
£6,207

£3,644 
£2,563 
TOTAL  £83,954
 £39,939 
£44,015 
 
 
Based on the above sample, the expected savings from just reducing the Injury 
On Duty Award by one level are estimated at £840K a year. 
 
 
Page 7 of 7