Information Services Directorate
Mr. John Walker
Library
University of East Anglia
Norwich NR4 7TJ
United Kingdom
Email
: [University of East Anglia request email]
Tel: +44 (0) 1603 593 523
18 January 2010
Fax: +44 (0) 1603 591 010
Web: http://www.uea.ac.uk
Dear Mr. Walker,
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 – INFORMATION REQUEST
(Our ref: FOI_09-154)
Further to Mr. Palmer’s letter of 21 December 2009 in response to your appeal of 21
December, I am writing to update you on the appeals process as it applies to this
request. For the purposes of the Stage One informal review, I am acting as the UEA
Information Policy Officer while Mr. Palmer is away from work.
I have examined the request and had discussions with relevant staff regarding this
matter. I have also considered the grounds of your appeal closely. Upon reflection, I
feel that the distance that exists between your position and that of the University as
stated in Mr. Palmer’s letter of 18 December 2009 is too great to be bridged by an
initial informal attempt at resolution by myself.
Your original request was for correspondence between Professor Jones and any
other person about the leak of information. This request is not for environmental
information and does not satisfy any of the criteria for handling under the
Environmental Information Regulations 2004. To be regarded as ‘Environmental
Information’ the information needs to satisfy at least one of these criteria: state of
elements of the environment and the interaction between those elements; factors
affecting or likely to affect the elements; measures such as policies, legislation,
plans, programmes, agreements, and activities affecting or likely to affect or protect
the elements; reports on environmental legislation; economic analyses and
assumptions used within the framework of environmental measures and activities;
human health and safety, cultural sites and built structures as they are affected by
elements of the environment. While elements of the information requested may
contain ‘Environmental Information’ and therefore come under EIR, they also may
not, and this would not be clear until a detailed examination of the information has
been conducted – an action we declined to undertake under our claim for the FOIA
s.12 exemption ‘Appropriate limit exceeded’. It is our view that it is correct that your
request should be initially handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
The other exemptions cited in Mr. Palmer’s letter are equal y valid, and I have no
reason to revoke any part of the decision conveyed in our response to you.
Given the above, could you confirm whether you would like me to progress your
appeal further to Stage Two.
For your information, the complaint process is described in Annex H of our Code of
Practice available on the web at
http://www.uea.ac.uk/is/strategies/infregs/FOIA+Code+of+Practice+for+Responding+
to+Requests
If you are dissatisfied with the final adjudication of your complaint by our internal
complaint process, you have the right of appeal to the Information Commissioner at:
Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF
Telephone: 01625 545 745
www.ico.gov.uk Please quote the file reference given at the head of this letter in all correspondence
with us.
Yours sincerely
Raymond Scott
Strategy Development Manager
University of East Anglia