L. Lluva
London Development Agency
Palestra
197 Blackfriars Road
London SE1 8AA
[FOI #23184 email]
T 020 7593 8000
F 0207593 8002
www.lda.gov.uk
[LDA request email]
Textphone 020 7593 8001
24 May 2010
FOI 440 Internal Review
Dear L. Lluva,
I am writing further to our letter of 12 May 2010 regarding the Internal Review of our response
to FOI 440 and to update you on what progress has been achieved to date.
Please note that in addition to having located, printed, indexed and collated the information
we hold relevant to your request we have now reviewed the information held, that is, minutes,
papers and summary reports relating to the Olympic Delivery Committee (ODC) meetings
which were produced in 2007. In reviewing this information we have considered whether any
of the information is exempt from disclosure, including applying the public interest test and
consulting third parties in instances where commercially sensitive information is included in
the material, often provided under confidentiality clauses.
Due to the volume of information held, to date we have been able to complete this exercise
for the documents relating to 2007 only. We will continue to review and consider the
information held pertaining to other years, which will follow in due course.
We have provided below 2 tables listing the following information:
1. Information held and provided:
A list of documents provided, including date of meeting, document reference number and
description, the nature of any information that has been redacted from each document
and the exemption which applies to these redactions. Further information regarding the
application of exemptions is provided subsequent to the tables.
2. Information withheld
A list of documents that are being withheld in full and the exemption which has been
applied.
1. Information Held and Provided:
Date
New
Document Description
Redactions
Section
Document
(N/A = no
Reference
redactions)
07/03/07
3694961
Agenda of meeting 07/03/07
Names
S40
3695242
Minutes of meeting 11/12/06
Names
S40
3695267
Action Sheet of 11/12/06
Names
S40
3702074
Item 6.1 Health and Safety Report
Names
S40
3702112
Item 6.2 Olympic Land Team –
Names
Progress Update Report
3702370
Item 6.2 Appendix 1
Names
Figures
Legal Advice
3702447
Item 6.2 Appendix 2
N/A
3702450
Item 6.2 Appendix 3
Names
S40
3702465
Item 6.2 Appendix 4
N/A
3702512
Item 6.2 Appendix 5
Names
S40
3702682
Item 6.2 Appendix 6
Names
S40
3702693
Item 6.2 Appendix 7
N/A
3702708
Item 6.2 Appendix 8
Names
S40
3702745
Item 6.2 Appendix 9
Names
S40
3702806
Item 6.2 Appendix 10
Names
S40
3703947
Item 7.1 Acquisition of the Freehold of
N/A
30 Marshgate Lane and Relocation of
PA Finlay & Co.
3703978
Item 7.1 Appendix 1
N/A
3703987
Item 7.1 Appendix 2
N/A
3704132
Item 7.1 Appendix 3
Names
S40
3704233
Item 7.1 Appendix 4
Names of
S43
companies,
status of
acquisition
and figures
3704760
Item 7.2 Authorisation of Statutory
Names S40
Compensation Payments Following
Confirmation of CPO by Secretary of
State
3704773
Item 7.2 Appendix 1
N/A
3704776
Item 7.2 Appendices 2,3,4
Names of
S43
companies,
status of
acquisition
and figures
3704852
Item 8.1 Update on Novation of
Names
S40
Olympic Contracts
Figures
S43
3704853
Item 8.1 Appendix 1
Names of
S43
companies,
status of
acquisition
and figures
3704859
Item 8.2 Olympic Legacy –
Names S40
Commitment to Sustainable
Regeneration (CSR)
3704864
Item 8.2 Appendix 1
N/A
09/07/07
3706510
Agenda of meeting 09/07/07
Names
S40
3705415
Minutes of meeting 07/03/07
Names
S40
3705428
Action Sheet of meeting 09/05/07
Names
S40
3705433
Item 6.1 Health and Safety Report
Names
S40
6705624
Item 6.1 Appendix 1
Names
S40
3705630
Item 6.1 Appendix 2
N/A
3705693
Item 6.3 Olympic Opportunities –
Names S40
Update Report
3705701
Item 6.3 Appendix 1
N/A
3705721
Item 6.4 Revised Terms of Reference
Names S40
of the Olympic Delivery
3705744
Item 6.4 Appendix 1
N/A
3705776
Item 7.1 Report Back on Olympic
N/A
Land Transactions
10/10/07
3706733
Agenda of meeting 10/10/07
Names
S40
3706947
Item 4.1 Powerlines Undergrounding
Legal Advice
S42
Compulsory Purchase Order (No.2)
3706950
Item 4.1 Appendix 1
N/A
3706972
Item 4.1 Appendix 2
Names
S40
3706982
Item 4.1 Appendix 3
Names
S40
3706986
Item 4.1 Appendix 4
3706809
Item 4.2 Olympic Park Energy Centre
Names S40
and Community Energy Networks
(EC&CEN) CHP System
3707048
Item 4.2 Appendix 3
Names
S40
3707234
Item 5.1 Olympic Land Team Progress Names
S40
Report
Figures
S43
22/11/07
3707688
Agenda of meeting 22/11/07
Names
S40
3707722
Minutes of meeting 09/07/07
Names
S40
Legal advice
S42
3707737
Minutes of meeting 10/10/07
Names
S40
3707773
Action sheet of meeting 22/11/07
Names
S40
3707821
Item 06 Olympic Legacy Directorate
Names S40
Progress Report
3707893
Item 06 Appendix 1
Names
S40
3707903
Item 06 Appendix 2
Figures
S43
3708181
Item 7 IBC/MPC
Names
S40
3708316
Item 7 Appendix 1
N/A
3710876
Item 8 Legacy Masterplanning
Names
S40
Framework: Appointment of
Figures
S43
masterplanning team
3710981
Item 8 Appendix 1
N/A
3711017
Item 8 Appendix 2 (part 2)
Names
S40
3711942
Item 8 Appendix 2 (part 2)
N/A
Board
3681818
Item 4.1 Summary Report of the ODC
Names
S40
Report
meeting 09/07/07
19/07/07
3682509
Item 4.1 Appendix 1
Names
S40
3682633
Item 4.1 Appendix 2
N/A
2. Information Withheld
Meeting
Document Description
Section
Date
10/10/07
Item 4.2 Appendix 1 Ernst & Young Multi-Utility Concession
S43
Contract Procurement (commercial and financial review of Utilities
Concession)
Item 4.2 Appendix 2 Arup Economic Regulation of the Community
S43
Energy Scheme
Item 4.2 Appendix 4 Legal Advice
S42
Application of Exemptions
Under Section 2 of the Freedom of Information Act, the duty of a public authority to give
access to information does not apply in respect of information which is exempt under the Act,
applying the public interest balance, where necessary, to the application of the exemption.
You will note that we have applied the following exemptions to the information requested:
Section 40
Section 40 of the Act exempts personal data about a third party from disclosure if the
disclosure would:
• breach any of the Data Protection Principles under the Data Protection Act; or
• cause (or would be likely to cause) substantial distress to the individual concerned.
The First Data Principle requires that disclosure of personal data under the Freedom of
Information Act must be fair. We consider the names of staff below the level of Director and
those of third parties to be exempt from disclosure on the basis that:
• the information is personal data;
• disclosure of the information would be unfair to the person concerned and therefore in
breach of the Data Protection Principles.
We therefore consider that this constitutes personal data exempt from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act. We have therefore redacted from the documents the names of
staff below the level of Director or equivalent and those of any third parties.
Section 42
Section 42 of the Act exempts information that is protected by legal professional privilege, that
is, information in respect of which a claim to legal professional privilege could be maintained
in legal proceedings.
Legal professional privilege covers communications between lawyers and their clients (in this
case the London Development Agency) for the dominant purposes of seeking or gaining legal
advice and of obtaining legal advice on litigation or for lawyers to use in preparing a case. We
have identified information which falls within this exemption, but Section 42 is a qualified
exemption and as such is subject to the public interest test. We believe that the public interest
in withholding this information outweighs the public interest in disclosing this information as
the LDA commonly encounters complex issues upon which it may need to seek specialist
legal advice. It is important that the LDA has access to full and frank legal advice and that any
such advice obtained will be protected by legal privilege. The LDA must have the freedom to
ask for advice in this manner and lawyers must be able to openly provide such advice with the
knowledge that it is safeguarded. This right to take and consider legal advice is important to
ensure the LDA can meet its legal obligations and duties and balance their complex
demands, which must be in the greater public interest.
We have therefore redacted information and in some cases withheld documents in their
entirety which are protected by legal professional privilege and are therefore exempt under
S42 of the Act.
Section 43(2)
Section 43(2) of the Act exempts information from disclosure if disclosure under the Act
would, or would be likely to, prejudice the commercial interests of any person (including the
public authority holding it).
We consider that this exemption is relevant to some information incorporated within the
documents requested, as shown above. This information relates to:
• contracts extant and still subject to negotiation;
• details of payments in relation to settlements still subject to negotiation
• financial
accounts;
• details of estimated figures relating to the value of land and property.
• Breakdown of project costs
In general terms, if the redacted information were released to the public it would in our view
be likely to either:
• Weaken the commercial position of the LDA in situations involving negotiation of
contracts and the sale of property in a competitive market, by revealing details of the
negotiating and financial positions of the LDA, which could be of advantage to a third
party when negotiating both ongoing and future contracts or sales.
• Detrimentally impact on the commercial position of businesses covered by the
information because competitors would become privy to information, such as the
finances and working practices of the businesses, to which they otherwise would not
have access.
• Damage the Agency’s business reputation and the confidence that customers,
suppliers and contracting parties may have in submitting tender proposals to the
Agency.
The exemption of prejudice to commercial interest is a qualified exemption. This means that
we are required to consider whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in
maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. We
consider that the public interest in maintaining the exemption in respect of each piece of
redacted information outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because:
• there is a strong likelihood that commercial prejudice will be suffered by the LDA or
third parties, as summarised above.
• disclosure of the information may prevent third parties from providing the LDA with
information relating to procurement opportunities in the future, thus undermining the
ability of the LDA to perform its functions
We are therefore unable to communicate the exempt information to you and as such it has
been redacted from the attached documents.
Please accept our apologies that we have been unable to provide the information in full to
date, but please be assured that we are doing everything possible to provide the requested
information as soon as is reasonably possible.
If you have any queries in the meantime please do not hesitate to contact us.
Yours sincerely,
Public Liaison Unit
London Development Agency
Document Outline