
REPORT OF: CHIEF EXECUTIVE'S POLICY UNIT MANAGER
TO: MANAGEMENT TEAM
DATE: 31ST JULY 2007
COMPLAINT MONITORING REPORT:
ANNUAL, 2006/07
Purpose of Report
1. This purpose of this report is to provide Management Team with an analysis of the documented complaints during 2006/07. By producing a quarterly report it is intended that trends should be easier to identify. The report should highlight any areas of concern or long-term corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence of complaints received.
Issue
2. The Council is committed to providing the best possible level of service to all of its customers. Sometimes though, people are unhappy and choose to complain. The corporate complaints policy and monitoring procedures are in place to resolve those complaints.
Each Service Area logs all complaints and compliments, no matter how they are received, to help us identify and address any issues that are regularly resulting in customer dissatisfaction.
Present Position
The analysis attached with this report (Appendix 1) is based on the information received from each Service Area for the period 1st April 2006 - 31st March 2007.
The number of reported complaints received by the Council during 2006/07 is 557, compared with 441 during 2005/06. Although this is an increase from last year, it should be noted that as agreed due to the introduction of the three stream waste collection and the high level customer contact, figures would be collected from October 2005 onwards.
The majority of complaints are being received through the Contact Centre (34%), which is different from the previous trend of writing a letter being the most popular way to complain. Letters (20%) and email (21%) continue to remain the common methods of complaining to the Council.
The category “Quality of service” attracted the most complaints this year, which is 72% of the total logged.
Response times are well within their time limits with very few going beyond the 15 days.
Significantly, the majority of complaints (97%) are resolved at Stage 1 (frontline staff) with very few being escalated to the Service Manager or Chief Executive.
Operational Services have received the highest number of complaints this year due to the nature of the services provided and account for 74% of the complaints received.
The Service Areas with no complaints reported over the year are Chief Executive Policy Unit, Financial Services and Property Services.
The Council received 90 compliments during 2006/07, which is a great increase from last year when we received 45.
It is pleasing to note that despite Operational Services attracting the most complaints, this Service Area also received the most compliments.
Corrective Actions
The following corrective actions have been put into place during 2006/07 to ensure the effective and efficient resolving of various complaints received and attempt to avoid further complaints being made.
Democratic and Legal Services - a number of complaints were received regarding two taxi companies, and this was resolved by the Taxi Licensing Officer contacting these companies and complainants in order to resolve the communication breakdown.
Parks and Outdoor Recreation - some issues were raised regarding playground equipment which needed fixing. This was responded to quickly due to the Park Keeper Service, which means any problems found within the Parks are dealt with immediately.
Ombudsman complaints
Despite our best efforts, some of our customers have felt the need to contact the Local Government Ombudsman in order to resolve their complaint.
This year (2006/07), the Ombudsman received 34 complaints from Pendle residents relating to a number of Service Areas. This has increased compared with the 26 that were received in 2005/06 and the 24 that were received in 2004/05.
The breakdown is as follows:
Highways 1
Housing (not including HB) 2
Local Taxation 6
Other 10
Planning 10
Public Finance 5
Total 34
Out of the 34 complaints where a decision has been reached, 13 were classed as “premature” - that is where the complainant has not allowed the Council an opportunity to deal with it in the first instance.
A breakdown of the remaining 21 is as follows:
3 complaints were settled locally where the Ombudsman agreed that the action taken by the Council was satisfactory to the complainant.
There were 7 complaints where the Ombudsman found no evidence of maladministration.
There were 2 complaints where the Ombudsman discontinued investigation due to no or insufficient evidence.
The Ombudsman was satisfied with the way the Council dealt with the complaints it had received, and the complaints which were investigated have highlighted no issues and given no cause for concern.
It was pleasing to note that the Council met its target of responding to the Ombudsman enquiries within 28 days, responding on average in just 21.5 days. This is a positive improvement from last year's performance when it was 32 days.
Policy Implications
Refer to the Corporate Complaints Policy.
Local Agenda 21 Implications
None.
Community Safety Implications
None.
Risk Management/Health and Safety Implications
None.
Financial Implications
None.
Conclusions
There are no significant trends during this year. Most complaints were received via the Contact Centre, and email is increasingly being used by the public to complain to the Council.
The majority of complaints continue to be resolved effectively and efficiently at Stage 1 (officer level) within 15 working days. Only a very small number progress to Stages 2 and 3 and exceed the 15 day timeframe.
It is apparent that some Service Areas are open to a high number of complaints due to the nature of the services provided (e.g. Operational Services and Parks and Outdoor Recreation) and not necessarily due to the quality of service provided.
RECOMMENDATIONS
(1) Management Team is asked to note this report.
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
To inform Management Team of the complaints received by the Council, and to resolve any issues identified.
LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS
Quarterly & Annual Complaints Analysis Forms received from each Service Area
Quarterly Complaints Log Sheets received from each Service Area
Town Hall,
NELSON,
Report Authors: Marie Mason (Tel:) (01282) 661790
Zarka Nazir (Tel:) (01282) 661973
E-Mail: [email address]
Background Papers: See above - these are all held on files within the Performance Management and Programmes Team and are available upon request
Ref: MM/ZN Date: 24th July 2007
APPENDIX 1
COMPLAINT ANALYSIS - PROFORMA (April 2006 to March 2007)
ALL SERVICE AREAS
Totals
Total number of complaints Quarter 1 - 144
Quarter 2 - 180 Quarter 3 - 116
Quarter 4 - 117 (557 - year to date)
Service Area Breakdown
No. 2006/07 2005/06
Accountancy & Audit 0 0% 0%
Chief Executive's Policy 0 0% 0%
Unit
Democratic & Legal 5 0.9% 0.9%
Economic Development 7 1.3% 0%
and Tourism
Engineering and Special 3 0.5 4.3%
Projects
Environmental Health 5 0.9% 2%
Housing Pendle 10 1.8% N/A
Housing Regeneration 9 1.6% 13.2%
Human Resources 1 0.2% 1.6%
ICT 0 0% 0%
Operational Services 413 74% 39.5%
Parks &Outdoor Recreation 48 8.6% 9.8%
Planning & BC 30 5.4% 7.5%
Property Services 0 0% 0.2%
Treasury services 26 4.7% 21.1%
TOTAL 557
Method of Complaint
No. 2006/07 2005/06
Telephone 105 18.9% 18.8%
Letter 111 19.9% 50.8%
E-mail 118 21.2% 19.7%
In person 8 1.4% 2.3%
Contact Centre 188 33.8 N/A
Online Form 10 1.8% N/A
PBC leaflet 11 2.0% 4.1%
Other 6 1.1 4.3%
TOTAL 557
Category of Complaint
No. 2006/07 2005/06
A - Satisfaction with policy/procedure 38 6.8% 8.1%
B - Statutory Responsibility 30 5.4% N/A
C - Employee attitude 23 4.1% 5.2%
D - Delays in responding 21 3.8% 5.4%
E - Quality Service 406 72.9% 58.5%
F - Response to request for information 10 1.8% 3.6%
G - Other 29 5.2% 19.3%
TOTAL FOR CATEGORIES 557
Response times
Average response times have been well within the 15 days allowed, and only 2.5% of the 557 complaints reported did go beyond this accepted timescale.
Once again, most complaints (543) were resolved at Stage One (Officer level) with 12 going to Stage Two (Service Manager). Only 2 complaints escalated to the Chief Executive.
Compliments
The number of compliments reported for the year is 90 and these are as detailed below:
Operational Services 16
Human Resources 15
Engineering and Special Projects 11
Economic Development and Tourism 11
Housing Regeneration Services 11
Environmental Health Services 9
Parks and Outdoor Recreation 8
Housing Pendle 3
Democratic and Legal Services 2
Planning and Building Control 1
Chief Executive's Policy Unit 1
Treasury Services 1
Housing Regeneration Services 1
1
1