This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Child Safety on the Internet'.
Freedom of Information – Response - 2025  
 
This request relates to the safe use of the Internet by primary and secondary school 
pupils in your region. Resources: 
 
1. The Byron Review, published 27 March 2008. 
2. The Byron Review Action Plan, published 24 June 2008. 
 
The resources above relate to the safety and education of children using the Internet at 
home and school, and the responsibility of government, local and national, to ensure that 
children are educated and protected whilst doing so.   
 
I hereby request under the Freedom of Information Act full details of the Internet Safety 
Actions and Initiatives currently in place throughout the region. 
 
 
1. Internet Safety Education provided as part of the school curriculum. 
  
Within your schools is there a specific program aimed at teaching children about 
staying safe online, including cyber bullying, been integrated into the curriculum? 
 
Response:  
The reference to a ‘program’ here suggests a computer program rather than a 
‘programme’ which would mean a module of work or a project focus. In relation to this, 
we would not be condoning any particular approach with a particular piece of software. 
However, we do support a process approach to schools in relation to internet safety in 
the following ways: 
 
•  Using Becta (formerly known as the British Educational Communications and 
Technology Agency) materials to help schools develop a process approach to e-
safety and acceptable use that includes everyone (see next section). 
•  The Personal Social  Development team is running a pilot with several schools 
called ‘Learning Together, Working With Parents’ which is focusing specifically on 
e-safety; and they are also running a conference in November concerned with 
anti-bullying of which cyber-bullying will be an integral part. This will aim to 
develop a student network with Y8 and above students specifically looking at anti-
bullying. 
  
If yes, who is responsible for delivery and what accreditations/training have they 
received?  For example, teacher, Child Exploitation and Online Protection trained 
ambassador. 
 
Response: 
Clearly, schools are responsible for setting up and delivering an acceptable use policy, 
(reference: Safeguarding children online - a guide for school leaders, Becta). To this end 
Inclusive School Improvement Service run workshops to support this work which is 
advertised on our CPD (Continuing Professional Development) Web site: 
www.suffolkcpd.co.uk
 

There are also several ‘boards’ and training opportunities that guide approaches to e-
safety, (the LA e-safety board, the E2bn* Regional broadband e-safety group and e2bn 
e-safety conferences). There is also a multi-agency e-safety steering group which is 
made up of members from organisations like Becta, NSPCC, Suffolk Colleges, 
Connexions, schools, Inclusive School Improvement Service, safeguarding board and 
library services. Some Police Education Partnership officers are trained as Child 
Exploitation and Online Protection ambassadors.  
 
*E2BN is the Learning Grid for the East of England and regional provider of the National 
Education Network. E2BN supplies schools with broadband services and innovative 
online learning projects. 
 
If yes, how often is internet safety training integrated into the school curriculum, 
i.e. weekly, monthly etc.? 
 
Response:
  
Schools are now expected to integrate e-safety work into their curriculum. For example,  
key stages 3 and 4 ICT National Curriculum makes specific reference to e-safety (in both 
key stages: Section 2: Key processes – ‘Developing ideas’ and ‘Communicating 
information’ contain mandatory references to e-safety). 
 
The new OFSTED guidance refers to ‘The extent to which pupils feel safe’ and 
categorises schools in their approaches to the extent to which e-safety processes are 
integrated into the school under the five main headings (Overall Effectiveness, 
Achievements and Standards, Provision of Curriculum and Teaching and Learning, 
Leadership and Management, and Training). The current SEF requires schools to 
respond to safeguarding issues. 
 
If no, what steps/timeframes are being taken for implementation? 
 
Response: 
Not applicable.  
 
 
2. Internet Filtering 
 
Do the primary and secondary schools within your authority have internet filtering 
in place? 
 
Response: 
All schools using the local authority broadband service have internet filtering in place. 
 
If yes, what tools do you use? For example Hardware or Software? 
 
Response:  
Filtering is provided centrally by an array of managed Web filtering and caching 
appliances. Direct access to the Internet is blocked on our exterior firewall. 
 
 
 


If yes, what is the name of your internet filtering supplier and when was their 
contract last renewed/due for renewal? 
 
Response: 
The contract was last renewed in 2009. Due for renewal in 2015. Supplier is East of 
England Broadband Network.    
 
 
3. Internet Filtering Breaches 
  
Have any of the schools within the past 24 months experienced a breach of 
Internet Filtering where children were able to access pornography or Indecent 
images. Please provide details of School Type (primary or secondary), Date of 
Breach and Type of Unsuitable material accessed. 
 
Response: 
None reported to Suffolk County Council. Blocking requests are made directly by schools 
to our supplier. We do not regard blocking requests as a breach of Internet Filtering. 
 
Our supplier reports that: 
"There were just 20 block requests that may be relevant in the 24 month period, 18 from 
secondary schools and 2 from primary. We are unable to provide a list of dates as the 
records contain personal data, however, the reports are spread over the whole 24 month 
period. It should be noted that this number of requests relates to the number of block 
requests from Suffolk schools' personnel including teachers and support staff, they do 
not necessarily mean that children have accessed an unsuitable site as the issue may 
have been picked up by teachers or school support staff who have a greater degree of 
Internet access than students. 
 
We do not regard these as a breach of filtering, they are part of the normal process of 
feedback and refinement. 
 
We are not sure how the requester distinguishes between Porn and indecent images, all 
the 20 requests above were classified as porn. However, we have had no (zero) reports 
from any school of illegal images being accessed by children." 
 
If a breach of security occurred how your authority was notified?  For example, by 
a parent, by the school, through an automated alert provided by 
hardware/software supplier. 
 
Response: 
Not applicable as none reported.