2005/60 money laundering and Insurance Intermediaries

Dear Sir or Madam,

Objective 15 2005/60 states

..the tightening of controls in the finance sector has prompted
money launderers and terrorist financers to seek alternative
methods of concealing the origin of the proceeds of crime ...the
anti money laundering and anti terrorist financing obligations
should cover LIFE INSURANCE INTERMEDIARIES...

Insurance intermediaries were set up by the "powers that be" (Eu
Institutions, FSA / Treasury and global finance industry experts)
in order to "wind up" the endowment sector. Many endowment
policyholders and distant consumers' savings are TRAPPED in these
non-competitive and highly restricted trading entities.

Endowment consumers' business was transferred by the industry / FSA
/ Treasury into these "finite" insurance intermediaries. Consumer
assets were NOT transferred here. 90% of endowment policyholders
assets were on company listing and or mergers transferred into the
pockets of staff in the finance industry.

Could the Treasury provide ALL documents and evidence that it has
in relation to the purported criminal activities of these life
insurance intermediaries set up by "the powers that be"?

Similarly objective 34 2005/60 states

Persons who convert paper documents into electronic data.... do not
fall within the scope of this directive, nor does any natural /
legal person that provides... message or support systems for
transmitting funds or with clearing and settlement systems.

The above would seem to suggest that those in the finance industry
can NEVER be guilty of crime as they are merely dealing in paper
and electronic transfers. However these "transfers" actually
involve consumers savings / investments / rights.

Can the Treasury provide details of HOW consumers can bring staff
in the finance industry to heel re any illegal "dealing"? (I myself
have experienced a share dealer whine in court "we were merely
handing a few bits of paper to our sister company". This "transfer'
involved the fraudulent acquisition by staff in the finance
industry of 69,000,000 free member entitlement shares that were
"lost" to 60,000 UK policyholders resident in Canada!!!)

Could the Treasury provide details of what processes that are in
place to ensure that the global finance industry does NOT exploit
objective 34 2005/60 and thus "cream" consumers out of their
rightful assets?

Yours faithfully,

Sheila Gibb

Dear Enquiries, CEU,

I know the Treasury is struggling with the "weight of
correspondence" that I have been sending through FOI requests.

However, the Treasury is among many of the organisations private
and or public that WILL NOT RESPOND to DISTANCE CONSUMERS of the UK
finance industry. (Apparently if you do NOT have a UK POSTCODE then
this government will NOT RESPOND even if you HAVE LEGITIMATE WEALTH
/ PROPERTY IN THE UK. I therefore have SEVEN years of
correspondence to catch up on whilst IN the UK.)

As a consequence I, a mere "distance consumer", radically affected
by the money laundering directives and their "dubious
implementation" seek ANSWERS to assist me to GET THE GOVERNMENT to
STOP the MASSIVE EXPLOITATION of DISTANCE CONSUMERS of the UK
FINANCE INDUSTRY. This is happening for a number of reasons but
EXISTING DISTANCE CONSUMERS (as opposed to NEW distant consumers
from October 2004) have NO CONSUMER PROTECTION and NO RIGHTS to
employ / direct a lawyer from overseas to DEFEND THEIR LEGITIMATE
WEALTH PROPERTY?

I would like an answer to the questions submitted. I do NOT believe
that I should be "classified" a FINANCIAL CRIMINAL FUNDING
TERRORISM because YOU the Treasury in collusion with the EU and
finance industry transferred my business into a highly illegal
entity called an INsurance Intermediary.

For the record I want my POOLED INVESTMENT FUND managed by a MUTUAL
INVESTMENT FIRM and the 10-20% annual returns on my INVESTMENTS
back. I do NOT want Life Insurance to which I did NOT contract and
a pissy Minimum Cost Plan. To call me the criminal here is simply
OUTRAGEOUS and DEFAMATORY.

To add insult to injury those STEALING member / consumer "rights"
on the FORCED listing of mutual socities are deemed NON-CRIMINALS
as they are "only dealing in electronic transfers or bits of
paper". Such "transfers" INVOLVE the CONSUMERS' WEALTH!!!! It is
only "fair" to ask WHERE are the processes to PREVENT the
EXPLOITATION of members / consumers given this "law"?

Yours sincerely,

Sheila Gibb