Follow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Census data for those who entered a non-binary sex
To Office for National Statistics by Nat Titman 14 May 2011
Ethnicity question on census
To Office for National Statistics by Steve Elibank 2 April 2010
Census non-compliance query.
To Office for National Statistics by Mija 22 July 2011
Census, is one needed
To Scottish Government by David Hansen 22 February 2009
Elderly Care Provision
To Harrow Borough Council by K Dudakia 10 July 2009
Online census forms filled out before 27th March 2011
To Office for National Statistics by Mandy Woods 13 February 2012
Questions regarding validity and necessity of 2011 Census
To Office for National Statistics by Alexander Hanff 30 January 2012
Clarification required
To Office for National Statistics by Mija 22 July 2011
Scotland's Census
To General Register Office for Scotland by T Kolek 30 June 2010
2001 UK Census ONS 'imputing' information
Mandy Woods made this Freedom of Information request to Office for National Statistics
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Mandy Woods to read a recent response and update the status.
From: Mandy Woods
7 February 2012
Dear Office for National Statistics,
Can you please confirm or deny in 2001, the ONS had to "impute"
information for 6.1 per cent of households who failed to fill in
the forms - more than 1.5million families, as reported in (among
many others) the Daily Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics....
If this is correct, how is this supposed to represent an 'accurate'
demographic of the nation?
As it is an 'offence' to falsify or give false information on the
form, how is it justified to 'impute' information, that is
inaccurate, and false by the ONS? Every family is different, you
cannot base answers left blank based on what the neighbours have
put in, as one household has very different needs from their
neighbours.
Who are these people 'imputing' information?
Are they and the ONS above the law?
Are they allowed to 'impute' information because the ONS can't be
bothered to chase up the correct information themselves?
What data do these people have in front of them?
What is done to protect the data and privacy of the person who has
already filled the form?
Yours faithfully,
Mandy Woods
Office for National Statistics
8 February 2012
Thank you for your recent FOI request to the Office for National
Statistics. I can confirm that we have received your request and it is
currently being dealt with. We will aim to respond as soon as possible, and
in any event not later than 20 working days from today.
Should you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact us
at [email address]
Yours Faithfully
Paul Wearn,
FOI Officer, ONS.
For the latest data on the economy and society consult National Statistics at http://www.ons.gov.uk
show quoted sections
Legal Disclaimer : Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Office for National Statistics
*********************************************************************************
show quoted sections
From: FOI Team
Office for National Statistics
8 March 2012
Our reference FOI001376
Dear ms Woods,
In response to your request under the Freedom of Information Act, I write
to advise that the strategy adopted in the 2001 Census was that, in order
to meet the requirements of users for a complete and consistent set of
census results that represented the whole population, the enumerated
counts were adjusted to take account of:
(a) missed data items that related to persons recorded in the
census;
(b) the numbers and characteristics of persons missed in resident
households that were recorded in the census; and
(c) the number and characteristics of persons in households that
were missed in the census.
Such adjusted data took account of information collected in a separate
Census Coverage Survey, and by comparing these with the data collected in
the Census itself. The methods of imputation used to derive the adjusted
data adopted standard statistical methodology which had been shown to
provide accurate estimates. The underlying methodology has been published
on the ONS website at:
[1]http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/c...
The value of the resulting statistics are thus much enhanced in comparison
with outputs where ‘not stated’ counts are included. As a result, all
users were able to analyse the same results and draw similar or comparable
conclusions. This had not been possible in previous censuses when users
themselves had to estimate the numbers and characteristics of people and
households not enumerated
The application of different levels of imputation, with the aim of
improving the utility of the statistics, is now adopted by many countries
conducting field enumeration censuses, and is, as far as England and Wales
is concerned, provided for by the provisions of the Census Act 1920 under
which the Census is lawfully carried out.
Details of the level of item imputation and record imputation in the 2001
Census (from which the Daily Telegraph may have obtained their figures)
were published in 2001 Census of England and Wales Quality Report in 2005.
This reported that the proportion of people missed in the Census was
estimated to be six per cent, comprising four per cent in households that
were enumerated and two per cent in households that were missed. The same
report also recorded that some six per cent of households were imputed.
The quality report also describes the particular method of imputation
adopted. A copy of this is available from our website at
[2]http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/c...
Imputation has been carried out only by members of ONS staff.
All personal data provided in the census is kept secure for 100 years. It
is unlawful, under the provisions of the Statistics and Registration
Service Act 2007 for ONS, or anyone employed by ONS, to disclose any
personal census information.
You have the right to have this response to your freedom of information
request reviewed internally by an internal review process and, if you
remain unhappy with the decision, by the Information Commissioner. If you
would like to have the decision reviewed please write to Dennis Roberts,
Office for National Statistics, Room 1214, Government Buildings, Cardiff
Road, Newport, Gwent, NP10 8XG.
If you have any queries about this email, please contact the Freedom of
Information Team ('[email address]')
Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future
communications.
Freedom of Information Team
Office for National Statistics
For the latest data on the economy and society consult National Statistics
at http://www.ons.gov.uk
show quoted sections
Legal Disclaimer : Any views expressed by the sender of this message are
not necessarily those of the Office for National Statistics
*********************************************************************************
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/c...
2. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/c...
Sarah Ledsom left an annotation ( 9 March 2012)
Why has this not been signed by whoever gave the answer. Afraid of incriminating themselves?
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Sarah Ledsom left an annotation (13 February 2012)
2011 Population and Housing Censuses document. After all this is where the demand that the Uk do the census in 2011 stems from. It will help you in getting information re the "IMPUTING" that has to be done. Also is it true that a Senior Exec of the ONS has stated that only 10% of forms are required anyway.
Hope you found this helpful.
Link to this