This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Penalty charge notices issued by CCTV at Stonecot Hill, Sutton'.
History and Legislation  
 
Chronological Summary 
 
 
Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 
•  Allowed use of devices such as cameras for the enforcement of Bus 
Lanes 
•  Devices must be Home Office approved 
 
 
 
Road Traffic Act 1991 
•  Decriminalised parking regulations, allowing Local Authorities to 
enforce 
 
 
 
London Local Authorities Act 1996 
•  Gave London Local Authorities power to enforce Bus Lanes using 
cameras 
•  PCN’s issued via 1st class post 
 
 
 
Greater London Authority Act 1999 
•  Gave Traffic Authority status to Transport for London 
 
 
 
London Local Authorities Act and Transport for London Act 2003 
•  Gave London Local Authorities power to enforce moving traffic 
contraventions 
 
 
 
Traffic Management Act 2004 
•  Gave London and non-London Authorities powers to enforce parking, 
bus lanes and moving traffic (only parking enacted so far) 
•  Intended to create greater consistency between London and non-
London Local Authorities 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1

History and Legislation  
 
 
Use of Cameras 
 
The use of cameras as an enforcement tool was not unique to the London 
Local Authorities Acts. The Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 said devices 
(such as Cameras) could be used to produce evidence of an infringement or 
contravention in legal proceedings and that the cameras must be Home Office 
Approved. The Road Traffic Offenders (Additional Offences and Prescribed 
Devices) order 1997 added offences relating to bus lane cameras as devices 
that may be used to produce evidence. 
 
 
Benefits of using cameras to enforce parking & traffic regulations: 
 
•  Evidence collected for all to stay 
•  Tape can be reviewed to ensure sound decision 
•  Enforcement actions can be monitored by supervisors 
•  Cameras in themselves are a deterrent 
•  Safer for enforcement staff 
•  Staff can cover wider area of enforcement in a given time span 
•  Less risk of intimidation of issuing officers 
•  Better public relations 
 
 
 
 
Transport for London (TfL) 
 
TfL enforces bus lanes throughout London under the powers invested upon it 
by the Transport for London (Bus Lanes) order 2001. The power to enforce on 
behalf of other London local authorities was granted when TfL was given 
traffic authority status for GLA roads and side roads under the Greater 
London Authority Act 1999

 
The geographical area covered by this power is the whole of Greater London 
and will extend as far as the area of responsibility for TfL. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2

History and Legislation  
Part II of the Road Traffic Act 1991 (RTA 91) 
 
The Road Traffic Act 1991 was the legislation that enabled local authorities to 
enforce on-street parking contraventions fairly and consistently. Prior to 1991 
police and traffic wardens carried this out and income from Fixed Penalty 
Notices (FPNs) was accrued to the Exchequer. The police service was 
increasingly unable to provide the resources necessary. The consequences of 
the lack of enforcement, in terms of road safety and congestion, were not 
acceptable and so the 1991 Act made it mandatory for London boroughs and 
optional for other local authorities to take on the civil enforcement of parking 
contraventions. This Act decriminalised parking contraventions meaning it 
was no longer the responsibility of the police, but the responsibility of Local 
Authorities. The Police still have a continuing role in some areas. For 
example, enforcing offences such as dangerous parking or parking offences 
at pedestrian crossings. 
 
Under this legislation, a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) would be issued to a 
vehicle in contravention and the Vehicle Owner is responsible for paying the 
PCN. The Registered Keeper is presumed to be the Owner. Penalty Charges 
are a civil debt that is due to the Local Authority. It is collected through a Civil 
Debt Recovery process. The Local Authority retains any proceeds from the 
PCNs however the spending of this revenue is limited to certain areas. 
Because the enforcement is decriminalised, cases are no longer heard by 
magistrate’s court, appeals will be dealt with by an Adjudicator working for the 
Appeals service. 
 
 
Priority Routes  
 
Priority Routes are created on the main thoroughfares to improve the 
movement of traffic, reduce congestion and improve the efficiency of the 
public transport network.  
 
The Priority Routes carry a “No stopping” restriction. During the operational 
hours vehicles may not stop to load, unload, park, pick up or set down 
passengers. There may be ‘boxes’ marked along the Priority Route where 
specific activities may take place, loading, setting down passengers, etc as 
stated on the accompanying signs. 
 
Enforcement of a Priority Route in London is the responsibility of Transport of 
London (TfL). The Priority Route is red and is known as the Transport for 
London Road Network (TLRN). 
 
 
Controlled Parking Zones (CPZs) 
 
This is an area that is controlled at given hours by the use of waiting 
restrictions and parking bays. Within CPZs, time plates for waiting restrictions 
are not necessary as the hours of restriction are indicated by ‘zone entry’ 
signs. 
 
3

History and Legislation  
 
 
The Traffic Management Act 2004 
 
The Traffic Management Act 2004 (TMA 2004) was introduced to bring 
London and non-London enforcement authorities into line in order to provide 
for greater consistency across the country while allowing for parking policies 
to suit local circumstances. Previously, London authorities had been given 
additional powers of enforcement which did not exist outside London. For 
example, it was only London authorities that were given powers to enforce 
moving traffic offences and footway parking. This Act now supersedes the 
RTA 91 and allows Civil Parking Enforcement or CPE (formerly 
Decriminalised Parking Enforcement) to be carried out by authorities England-
wide. It also seeks to ensure that the system is fair to the motorist as well as 
effective in enforcing parking contraventions when they occur. 
 
To be able to enforce regulations a local authority must apply to the Secretary 
of State for Transport to introduce a Civil Enforcement Area (CEA). This 
allows local authorities to enforce traffic regulations within dedicated 
geographical areas. Within the CEA, traffic enforcement is no longer the 
responsibility of the police but that of the Local Authority. It is now the job of 
the Civil Enforcement Officer or CEIO (formerly Parking Attendant) to identify 
that a contravention (offence) has taken place and to issue a Penalty Charge 
Notice. Contraventions can be identified either by CEOs on-street or by CEOs 
operating approved devices, such as CCTV cameras. Outside a CEA, all 
traffic regulations remain subject to the criminal law and remain the 
responsibility of the Police Service. 
 
Please note – The TMA 2004 is being introduced in stages. From the 31st of 
March 2008, it is only parking contraventions that have been enacted under 
the TMA 2004. Moving traffic contraventions (bus lanes and other moving 
traffic contraventions) will not be enacted until at least 2009. London 
authorities in the mean time will continue to enforce bus lanes and moving 
traffic under powers given to them by the London Local Authorities Acts as 
explained below.  
 
 
 
London Local Authority Act 1996 
 
The London Local Authorities Act 1996 gave powers to London authorities to 
enforce moving traffic offences on local authority bus lanes. 
 
Up until that point local authorities were responsible for the enforcement of 
stationary parking contraventions only, with the police retaining responsibility 
for all moving traffic offences. The Bus Lane contravention was the first 
moving traffic offence to be enforceable by Local Authorities. 
 
The LLA 1996 made it possible for Bus Lane offences to be enforced using 
CCTV, static or bus mounted camera equipment. The Penalty Charge Notice 
 
4

History and Legislation  
will be served by post to the registered keeper. Prior to this the notice had to 
be served to the driver or the vehicle at the time of issue. 
 
Six London authorities operated a pilot scheme to assess the feasibility of 
camera enforcement. During the pilot scheme a legal technicality was 
highlighted which temporarily suspended camera enforcement. The wording 
of the Act did not make it clear if the driver or the keeper of the vehicle was 
legally liable for the PCN, this difficulty was later amended by the London 
Local Authorities Act 2000

 
The London Local Authorities Act 2000 allowed enforcement of parking 
contraventions via CCTV. This power has now been consolidated into the 
Traffic Management Act 2004
 
 
 
London Local Authority and TfL Act 2003 
 
The London Local Authority and TfL Act 2003 gave local authorities the power 
to enforce a range of moving vehicle contraventions, such as box junctions 
and banned turns. Apart from the bus lane contravention, this was the first 
time enforcement had been permitted on moving vehicles. 
 
CCTV was chosen as the best method to enforce these codes. A whole range 
of moving ‘offences’ has been passed over to Local authorities to enforce. 
These PCNs will be issued and served by post in the same way as a bus lane 
or parking ticket. 
 
The LLA Acts 1996 & 2003 gave London authorities additional powers of 
enforcement. Legislation already existed (RTA 91) which specified how PCNs 
should be processed so this remained the same. Therefore with a few minor 
changes to the process (to take into account the PCN being served by post) 
the LLA 1996 allowed that in all other respects a PCN is processed as if it 
were a Penalty Charge Notice issued under the Road Traffic Act 1991. It 
follows the same civil debt recovery route. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5