1
Summary
•
0
-
.
%
)#
- %
%/ .
0
%
/
%
%
1
%
%
2
% !3
/
%
2
3
/
,
%
/ $
,
%
/
&
$
%
%
%
0
%
%
/
%
%
3
-
3
0
0
%
/ 4
&
$
%5
6
"")+ 7
8
9
0 ##"/
:
*
4
-
0
;
%
%
%/ :
0
<
%
=0
%
%
%
/
%
%
-
%
/
.
0
2
%
/
>
%
%
%
>
Doc No WHR1006 Rev: 4 Date: July 2009
W:\wh\tec\WLBTDS Lower Thames Dredging Study\Reporting\JULY 09\FinalReport_JULY_09.doc
%
>
/
•
.
%
;
%<.
?
; =
$
%
"3 ### <8
8
=/
0
%
8
8
% "" <./ / *
=/
- %
%
$
2$
/
•
+
-
-
/
-
%
%
%
%
" <8
8
=/ .
%
'0###
,(0###
0
/
,
%
/ .
0
/
•
1
!
/ 5
'#
%
/ 5
%
%
-
##" <
*
5
*
=0
%
%
0
%0
%
@ /
%
/
•
+
'
.%
' %
%
/
3
%/
Doc No WHR1006 Rev: 4 Date: July 2009
W:\wh\tec\WLBTDS Lower Thames Dredging Study\Reporting\JULY 09\FinalReport_JULY_09.doc
%
%
/ *
3
/
%
/ 6
##0###
(
%
3
/
%
%
#0###
(
#0###
(
%
3
%
-
%
/
%
%
/
%
%
A!3
(##
%
%
A!3 ##
% /
.
0
2
A!3'##
/
Change in river
Reach
bed
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Teddington
Net volume (cu m)
-65,541
-98,645
Average level (m)
-0.13
-0.19
Molesey
Net volume (cu m)
-101,023
Average level (m)
-0.27
Sunbury
Net volume (cu m)
-100,190
Average level (m)
-0.27
Shepperton
Net volume (cu m)
41,956
-58,619
Average level (m)
0.23
-0.33
Chertsey
Net volume (cu m)
-12,233
-18,856
Average level (m)
-0.07
-0.11
Penton
Net volume (cu m)
70,003
-97,681
Hook
Average level (m)
0.31
-0.49
Bel Weir
Net volume (cu m)
-9,384
57,503
-56,577
Average level (m)
-0.04
0.25
-0.30
Old
Net volume (cu m)
11,461
-35,955
35,246
-33,446
Windsor
Average level (m)
0.05
-0.15
0.16
-0.20
Romney
Net volume (cu m)
-18,343
-48,492
Average level (m)
-0.10
-0.28
Boveney
Net volume (cu m)
-91,811
Average level (m)
-0.36
Bray
Net volume (cu m)
57,700
-39,791
Average level (m)
0.32
-0.22
Boulters
Net volume (cu m)
-40,614
-42,379
Average level (m)
-0.22
-0.23
Cookham
Net volume (cu m)
28,406
Average level (m)
0.07
Marlow
Net volume (cu m)
-48,218
Average level (m)
-0.29
Temple
Net volume (cu m)
-8,743
-33,170
Average level (m)
-0.08
-0.29
Values in blue indicate net erosion for reach
Values in red indicate net deposition for reach
Doc No WHR1006 Rev: 4 Date: July 2009
(
W:\wh\tec\WLBTDS Lower Thames Dredging Study\Reporting\JULY 09\FinalReport_JULY_09.doc
•
8
-
2
3
/
%
%
0
/ 4
0
- %
B %
'C3'#C
%
/ 4
3
- %
%
3
/ 4
%
3
3 @
/
%
%
%
0
%
/
3
0
/
•
-
!
D
/
E '
E+'
/
$
<D
.
-D =0
/
•
-
&
$
%
$
%
-
/
1
%<
=0
%
0
-
%
/
/
-
%$
%
/
•
(
0
/
Doc No WHR1006 Rev: 4 Date: July 2009
)
W:\wh\tec\WLBTDS Lower Thames Dredging Study\Reporting\JULY 09\FinalReport_JULY_09.doc
-
%
/
1
%
%
%
2
/
Doc No WHR1006 Rev: 4 Date: July 2009
'
W:\wh\tec\WLBTDS Lower Thames Dredging Study\Reporting\JULY 09\FinalReport_JULY_09.doc
