This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Number of speeding fines on A14 near Cambridge'.
CATEGORY OF INFORMATION
FOI EXEMPTION
PUBLIC INTEREST TEST – FOR 
PUBLIC INTEREST TEST –
DISCLOSURE
AGAINST DISCLOSURE
FOIA SECTION 31
CAMERA SITE SPECIFIC DATA
LAW ENFORCEMENT
FOR DISCLOSURE
AGAINST DISCLOSURE
Includes detailed programme of 
Section A & B (Exemption and PIT 
camera sites – both fixed and 
applies for both)
Awareness- this information could 
Exemption applies- It is in the 
mobile
This information contains working 
assist individuals in gaining an 
interest of the public that our roads 
Information concerning details about  practices that if known would have 
understanding of road safety in areas 
are kept safe.  The ability for safety 
the utilisation of sites. (This includes
an impact on operational policing. 
where cameras are located.  This 
camera technology to impact on road 
numbers of COFPNs issued at a site, 
would therefore help them gain 
safety would be diminished by the 
number of hours the site has been 
1) Not all camera sites will be 
awareness regarding road safety 
disclosure of such information and 
utilised, income generated from each 
active all of the time – some 
issues.
therefore prejudice law enforcement.  
site etc.)
sites will be active on a 
In regards to the Health & Safety 
rotational basis.  If 
Accountability- Safety Camera 
exemption a detailed programme 
information concerning 
Partnerships should be accountable 
could put operators at risk where they 
specific site data is released 
for the decisions they make in 
are
single crewed in remote 
it could give the impression 
relation to camera sites.
locations.
that the chances of being 
recorded speeding in 
Efficient and Effective Conduct of 
particular locations was low, 
Road Safety Partnership activities-
which may encourage higher 
The aim of such partnerships is to 
speeds and hence casualties 
make roads safer by encouraging 
at those locations. 
people to keep within the speed 
2) For camera enforcement to 
limits, hence reducing speeds, 
be truly effective there must 
reducing collisions and, 
be the perception that the
consequently, reducing the number 
chances of being recorded at 
of people killed and injured. The 
high at all sites.
consequence of the release of this 
3) Cameras are deployed on an 
information would be to compromise 
intelligence led basis the 
this aim.
disclosure of sites will make 
this approach invalid.

FOIA SECTION 38
HEALTH & SAFETY
Section A

1) A detailed programme could 
put operators at risk where 
they are single crewed in 
remote locations.   
2) The disclosure of specific 
data on camera sites would 
make the camera  
deployment  less effective 
which would impact on the 
safety of pedestrians and 
road users at large.
Decision: It is considered that the public interest in disclosing site specific data at this level is outweighed by the potential consequences to law 
enforcement and the impact of such a release on road safety measures

What could be disclosed: 1 )The total revenue / fines issued by of Camera Partnerships 2) A high level programme of mobile cameras which only 
provides locations at area levels either daily or weekly with a caveat that they can change at short notice due to operational requirements.



Document Outline