This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Legal cases and directors expense claims'.
 
Office of the Commissioner 
PO Box 61791 
London 
SW1P 9NT 
 
 
 
E   [email address] 
 
W  www.childmaintenance.org 
 
 
 
 
Mr Trevor Boult 
Ref:  VTR 1359 
 
 
[FOI #14537 email]
Date: 16 October 2009 
 
 
 
Dear Mr Boult, 
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request dated 10 July 2009. Your request has 
been considered under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FoI Act).  Please 
accept our apologies for the delay in replying.  Please find below a copy of your request 
together with a corresponding response. 
 
Request  
I would like to request the following information 
 
(1) Details and out come of all legal cases taken against the Child support agency 
 
(2) Copies of all expense claims made by any directors of the Child support agency since 
2004 
 
(3) For each of the financial years covering the period 2005-2009 I would like to know the 
total number of each of the following; 
 
(3.1) Complaints against the Child Support Agency leading to a finding of maladministration 
by the agency. 
 
(3.2) Complaints against the Child Support Agency leading to a finding that the CSA had 
unlawfully gathered information. 
 
(3.3) Complaints against the CSA leading to the CSA changing its records to remove 
unlawfully gathered or unlawfully stored information. 
 
(3.4) Complaints against the CSA leading to a finding that the CSA had either misstated the 
law or misdirected itself in law. 
 
(3.5) Complaints against the CSA leading to the CSA making a payment of compensation to 
the complainant. 
 
(4) I understand that one of the changes since CMECH was introduced was a requirement to 
speed up payment of arrears. 
 
(4.1) Please confirm how many cases of agreed payments of arrears with payments expected 
to last more than 2 years have unilaterally now been reassessed to be paid within 2 years? 


 
 
(4.2) Please break down the expected percentage of NRP's net income the new shorter 
proposed repayments will mean. 
 
(5) In order to enable me to make an independent assessment of the causes of complaints 
against CSA / CMEC I would be grateful if you would forward to me; 
 
(5.1) Any guidance prepared (within the last three years) for managers of CSA debt 
enforcement teams (or teams of CSA staff charged with collecting arrears) as to appropriate 
key performance indicators to be used for assessing their team's performance. 
 
(5.2) Any guidance provided (within the last three years) to managers of CSA debt 
enforcement teams (or teams of CSA staff charged with collecting arrears) as to appropriate 
key performance indicators to be used for assessing the performance of individual team 
members.  
 
(5.3) Any guidance provided (within the last three years) to managers of CSA debt 
enforcement teams (or teams of CSA staff charged with collecting arrears) as to appropriate 
reasons for instituting individual performance improvement plans with individual team 
members. 
 
(5.4) The definitions of all key performance indicators currently used with CSA debt 
enforcement teams (or teams of CSA staff charged with collecting arrears. 
 
(5.5) The numbers of CSA staff disciplined as a result of a finding of maladministration 
against them for each of the last five years 
 
Response 
 
The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (the Commission) took over 
responsibility for the Child Support Agency on 1 November 2008. 
 
The information you requested falls under Exemption 21 of the FoI Act, which covers 
information which is already reasonably accessible. This is because we have previously 
provided you with some of this information, in response to previous FoI requests, and the 
remainder is published on the whatdotheyknow website. 
 
In response to your specific questions. 
 
1.  
Please refer to our FoI responses to you dated 11 June 2009 (Ref. VTR1049), 17 July 
2009 (Ref. VTR1118) and 17 August (Ref. VTR 1413). 
 
2.  Please refer to our FoI responses dated 7 August 2009 (Ref. VTR1049) and 16 
September 2009 (Ref. VTR 1583). 
 
3.1 – 3.4 Responses to the information you requested is published on the 
whatdotheyknow.com website.  Our response (Ref. VTR 1245) can be accessed at: 
 
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/outcome_of_complaints_against_th#incoming-
34602


 
4.1 – 4.2 Responses to the information you requested is published on the 
whatdotheyknow.comwebsite. Our response (Ref. VTR 365) can be accessed at: 
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/csacmech_number_of_cases_of_acce#incoming-
31498

5.1 – 5.5  Responses to the information you requested is published on the  
whatdotheyknow.com website.  Our response (Ref. VTR 1298) can be accessed at: 
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/performance_indicators_for_child#incoming-34603
If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number 
above.   
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission 
Freedom of Information Act Focal Point  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act 
 
If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing 
[email address] or by writing to Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission, Freedom of 
Information Act Focal Point, PO Box 61791, London, SW1P 9NT.  Any review request should be submitted within two 
months of the date of this letter.  
 
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner’s 
Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our own complaints 
procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, 
Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk
 

Document Outline