This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Common Purpose'.
 
 
 
 
Your Ref: 
 
 
 
 
Our Ref: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
Force Disclosure Unit 
Police Headquarters 
173 Pitt Street 
GLASGOW 
G2 4JS 
 
Tel: 0141 435 1217 
 
Fax: 0141 435 1218 
 
Dear  
 
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NUMBER  
 
I refer to your request for information dated 13 February 2009, which was received by 
Strathclyde Police on that date.  
 
Your request for information has now been considered and on 12 March 2009, a decision was 
made to provide some of the information requested by you.  Some of the information 
requested by you is, however, considered to be exempt in terms of the Freedom of 
Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (the Act).  Section 16 of the Act requires Strathclyde Police 
to provide you with a notice which: (a) states that it holds the information, (b) states that it is 
claiming an exemption, (c) specifies the exemption in question and (d) states, if that would 
not be otherwise apparent, why the exemption applies. Where information is considered to be 
exempt, this letter serves as a Refusal Notice and an explanation of the appropriate exemption 
is provided.   
 
Please detail total expenditure by Strathclyde police on common purpose courses for each 
of the following years: 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 
and 2008 to date.  
 
In relation to years 1997 – 2003 inclusive, Strathclyde Police does not hold the information 
you request and in terms of Section 17 of the Act, this letter represents a formal notice that 
information is not held.  By way of explanation, the invoices pertaining to charges made up to 
2003, inclusive, were destroyed in line with the Strathclyde Police Record Retention Policy (4 
years plus current year to be held).  A copy of the Record Retention Schedule can be found 
via the following link http://www.strathclyde.police.uk/index.asp?locID=535&docID=-1  
 
The total expenditure by Strathclyde Police on Common Purpose courses from 2004 to date is 
detailed in the table below. 
 
YEAR 
TOTAL COST (£) 
2004 
4,641.25
2005 
4,641.25
2006 
4,935.00
2007 
8,489.00
2008 22,839.38
2009 
00.00

 
Please also supply a copy of the invoice for each common purpose course paid for by the 
Strathclyde police force by [common purpose] I mean the training organisation of that 
name: http://www.commonpurpose.org/home.aspx
 
The invoices you have requested are attached.  Please note that 3 of the invoices contain a 
typographical error (AZ 0448, AZ 0449 and AZ 0450), in that the Invoice date / tax point is 
given as 8 December 2009.  These should read 8 December 2008 and I have confirmed that 
payments were made in December 2008.  You will also notice that some names have been 
redacted from some of the documents.  In relation to invoices numbered AZ 0449 and AZ 
0387 (second redaction) the following exemption applies: 
 
Section 35(1)(a) & (b) Law enforcement 
 
The officers concerned are currently, or will be in the very near future, involved in sensitive, 
covert roles within the force.  Release of their names may compromise the investigations in 
which they are involved, their safety, the safety of their colleagues and of the public.  Release 
of their names and the consequences of this may also prevent officers from wishing to carry 
out these roles in the future, and would, or would be likely to prejudice substantially the 
prevention or detection of crime and the apprehension or prosecution of offenders. 
 
This is a non-absolute exemption and requires the application of the public interest test. 
 
Section 39(1) Health, safety and the environment 
 
Release of the names of officers who are in these roles would, or would be likely to, endanger 
the physical or mental health or the safety of an individual.  Identification of the officers 
concerned could not only compromise any investigations that they are involved in, but also 
their own safety and would discourage others from wishing to carry out such duties in the 
future, for fear that their safety would be put at risk.  If the officers are put at risk, the safety 
of their colleagues would also be compromised and the effectiveness of the investigations 
hindered.  If this were to occur, then the safety of the public would also be put at risk.   
 
This is a non-absolute exemption and requires the application of the public interest test. 
 
Public Interest Test 
 
As you can see, the above exemptions are non-absolute and require the application of the 
public interest test.  It could be argued that accountability for public funds would favour 
disclosure.  That said, the applicability of the above exemptions, the nature of the criminal 
investigations that the officers are involved in, their personal interests, their safety and the 
safety of others and the need for the efficient and effective conduct of the force favour 
retention of this information. 
 
In relation to invoice numbered BQ 0077, AZ 0326 and AZ 0387 (first redaction) the 
following exemption applies: 
 
Section 38(1)(b) Personal information  
 
The information requested is exempt as it contains personal data relating to living individuals, 
specifically, the names of individuals who have since ceased employment with Strathclyde 
Police.  The release of this information to a third party would breach the requirement to 
process personal data fairly, as laid down by the first data protection principle in Schedule 1 
of the Data Protection Act 1998.  In this case the data was gathered for the purpose of 
policing and to process it for another purpose would be unlawful. 
 
This is an absolute exemption and does not require the application of the public interest test. 
 

I hope this information is helpful, however, if you are not satisfied with the way in which 
your request has been dealt with, you are entitled in the first instance to request a review of 
the decision made by the Force.  Should you wish to request such a review, please write to 
Mrs Sheena Brennan, Disclosure Manager at the above address within 40 working days of 
receiving this letter.  Once informed of the Review Panel’s decision, if you are still not 
satisfied, then you are entitled to apply to the Scottish Information Commissioner for a 
decision.  Contact details are; Office of the Scottish Information Commissioner, Kinburn 
Castle, Doubledykes Road, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9DS, telephone 01334 464610.  I would 
like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in Strathclyde Police.   
 
Should you require any further assistance concerning this matter please contact me directly on 
0141 435 1217 quoting the reference number given. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
Christine Boyd 
Sergeant