This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Performance indicators for CHild Support Agency / CMEC debt enforcement staff and teams'.
 
Office of the Commissioner 
PO Box 61791 
London 
SW1P 9NT 
 
 
 
E   [email address]
 
W  www.childmaintenance.org 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mr Gareth Davies 
Ref:  VTR 1298 
 
 
[FOI #14079 email]
Date: 12 October 2009 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dear Mr Davies, 
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request dated 4 July 2009. Your request 
has been considered under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 
(FOIA).  Please accept our apologies for the delay in replying.  Please find below a 
copy of your request together with a corresponding response.   
 
Request  
In order to enable me to make an independent assessment of the causes of 
complaints against CSA / CMEC I would be grateful if you would forward to me; 
 
Q1. Any guidance prepared (within the last three years) for managers of CSA debt 
enforcement teams (or teams of CSA staff charged with collecting arrears) as to 
appropriate key performance indicators to be used for assessing their team's 
performance. 
 
Q2. Any guidance provided (within the last three years) to managers of CSA debt 
enforcement teams (or teams of CSA staff charged with collecting arrears) as to 
appropriate key performance indicators to be used for assessing the performance of 
individual team members. 
 
Q3. Any guidance provided (within the last three years) to managers of CSA debt 
enforcement teams (or teams of CSA staff charged with collecting arrears) as to 
appropriate reasons for instituting individual performance improvement plans with 
individual team members. 
 
Q4. The definitions of all key performance indicators currently used with CSA debt 
enforcement teams or teams of CSA staff charged with collecting arrears. 
 
Q5. The numbers of CSA staff disciplined as a result of a finding of 
maladministration against them for each of the last five years. 
 
 
 


 
Response 
To support day to day Performance Management we operate a Performance and 
Development System which applies to all employees across the business as a whole.  
This involves setting clear work objectives and the discussion of competencies 
appropriate to the level an individual is working.  The process includes agreeing learning 
and development needs between the individual and their line manager resulting in a 
Personal Development Plan being produced.  Continuous feedback takes place 
throughout the reporting period. 
Managers are expected to have day to day involvement in performance, which includes 
ensuring their people receive training and coaching, enabling them to deliver the level of 
service clients should expect.  Managers are also expected to tackle poor performance 
as this weakens the ability of the Commission to serve the public. 
Other than the Performance and Development system no specific guidance has been 
distributed to Debt Enforcement Teams to assess the performance of individuals or 
teams. However, I have included some information below which is reflected in an 
individuals key work objectives, competencies and performance reporting. 
  September 2008:    
 
•  Team Leaders will use Voice Recording to confirm debt negotiations have been 
undertaken appropriately during non-resident parent telephone contact including 
the use of Caseworker Online; 
 
•  Team Leaders will examine Payment Arrangement Guide sheets for every 
agreement and/or arrangement made to ensure the Debt Steer has been applied 
and will randomly cross reference using the Voice Recording process above and 
Task 567s to ensure Preferred Methods of Collection are being promoted. 
 
  The 2009/10 Key Performance Indicator (KPI) that applies to all lines of business 
within Debt Enforcement is provided below: 
  
Proposed Measure 
Rationale 
Lead Line of 
Business 
Arrears Arrangements.        This measure is designed to ensure 
Debt Enforcement 
At least 95% of new arrears 
appropriate arrangements including 
arrangements will be 
the use of discretion. Performance to 
Additional Measures 
accurate when compared to 
be reported via the Quality 
to support KPI 
the agency debt steer. 
Assurance Team. This measure 
Delivery 
applies to all lines of business as 
Payment Arrangements will be made  Checks completed 
by all caseworkers                               on all Payment 
     
Arrangements & 
documentation to 
support decision  
  
 

 
  Enforcement Teams work toward the following target:  Leading and co-coordinating 
on the delivery of the Agency Collections target of £1.08 billion during 2008-09 of 
which at least £220 million should be arrears.   
 
  Employees who negotiate the repayment of arrears with clients are required to follow 
guidance which is sometimes referred to as the Debt Steer.  I have attached an 
overview of this guidance at Annex A to this letter. 
 
Finally, you asked for the numbers of people disciplined as a result of maladministration 
for each of the last five years. This information is not available as it is not recorded for 
management information purposes. As part of the performance and development system 
full guidance is provided for managers on how to deal with poor performance.  This can 
lead to informal or formal action being taken.    
 
The Commission is committed to taking reasonable measures necessary to help, support 
and encourage its employees to perform to a satisfactory standard. Managers should 
make employees aware of any capability issues and will talk to the employee to find out 
the reasons for the performance issues and establish if there are any underlying 
problems. 
 
 
I hope you find the information you have been provided with helpful.  If you have any 
queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number above.   
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
 
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission 
Freedom of Information Act Focal Point  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------- 
Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act 
 
If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing 
[email address] or by writing to Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission, 
Freedom of Information Act Focal Point, PO Box 61791, London, SW1P 9NT.  Any review request should be submitted 
within two months of the date of this letter.  
 
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner’s 
Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our own 
complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner’s Office, 
Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk
 

 
Annex A - Policy Overview 
 
Background 
When a non-resident parent is liable to pay arrears of child maintenance it is essential to 
initiate prompt recovery action. The policy intention is to recover outstanding arrears as 
quickly as possible: 
•  Voluntary offers to repay by instalments must be sustainable. For example, if the 
non-resident parent offers to repay 90% of net income over a 3 months period the 
case-worker should seek assurance this commitment is feasible.     
•  Enforcing arrears recovery is a discretionary decision and when implementing a 
Deduction from Earnings Order (DEO) the case-worker must have regard to the 
Protected Earnings rate. The non-resident parent should always be left with at least 
60% of net income.  
 
Exercising Discretion 

Determining the rate of arrears recovery and/or deciding to take enforcement action are 
decisions made on behalf of the Commissioner for Child Maintenance and discretion 
must be exercised. When determining the recovery amount and/or enforcing debt 
recovery the case-worker must always have regard to: 
•  The welfare of any child involved. When exercising discretionary powers the case-
worker should always take account of the child’s best interest. This is especially 
important where a child is seriously ill or disabled.  
•  The needs of the non-resident parent and any second family 
•  Representations of hardship from the non-resident parent 
 
Arrears Negotiation  
Caseworkers should adhere to the following guidance when setting up a collection 
agreement:   
•  Full payment should be sought in the first instance. 
•  If not a lump sum should be sought – caseworkers should access ‘Caseworker 
Online’ to view available information about the non-resident parent’s current 
financial commitments to support them in negotiating the maximum lump sum 
possible.  A lump sum should be sought which will allow a minimum of 30% (for 
CSCS cases the higher of £5 or 33% contribution) of net income to clear the whole 
debt within a 2 year period.  
•  If this is not possible a lump sum payment which will allow contributions at 40% of 
net income, covering regular maintenance and arrears, to ensure debt is repaid 
within 2 years may be appropriate. Any payments from the non-resident parent will 
be regarded as an Arrangement rather than an Agreement and : 
•  A Deduction from Earnings Order can be sought to recover up to 40% of net 
income. 
•  If a Deduction from Earnings Order does not clear the entire debt in 2 years, a 
parallel liability order can also be sought. In general, the Commission does not 
currently seek a liability order where arrears are less than £1,000 – however 

 
this threshold is kept under review and improved enforcement powers may 
prompt the Commission to review any such arrangements.  

Document Outline