From: Simms Malcolm (ST)  
Sent: 23 December 2008 11:28 
To: 'Stella Osibona' 
Cc: John Tristan (ST); Edwards Sarah (ST); 'Alicia Deboos-Mylett' 
Subject: RE: Christchurch Road box jucntion  
 
Sorry for the delay in responding 
 
Part of this junction has been made “unenforceable” on CCTV, despite the whole 
thing having DfT approval. 
 
The issues are 
 
1)  It is alleged that the exit is not visible from the entry, and therefore drivers 
can’t make a proper decision on whether it’s appropriate to enter 
2)  There’s some belief amongst drivers that part of the ybj is unnecessary 
(around the traffic island) because cars stationary here do not cause an 
obstruction 
 
The CCTV staff are refraining from enforcing where these considerations apply, and 
have done so since mid August, so no controversial PCNs should be in your 
workload. All I would ask is that if these factors are raised in mitigation and the 
CCTV makes it look credible, please exercise discretion and cancel to ensure we are 
consistent with our current enforcement policy 
 
Thanks, 
 
M 
 
From: Stella Osibona  
Sent: 12 December 2008 14:48 
To: Simms Malcolm (ST) 
Cc: John Tristan (ST); Edwards Sarah (ST); Alicia Deboos-Mylett 
Subject: FW: Christchurch Road box jucntion  
Importance: High 
 
Hi Malcolm 
 
 
Are there any instructions that we need to be observing for the above box junction 
 
 
 
 
Thanks 
Stella 
From: Alicia Deboos-Mylett  
Sent: 12 December 2008 14:44 
To: Stella Osibona 
Subject: Christchurch Road box jucntion  
 
Stella,  

---

 
Fyi, not sure if you were aware of this news article 
 
Alicia 
 
From: Ashleigh Savin  
Sent: 12 December 2008 14:42 
To: Alicia Deboos-Mylett 
Subject: GT27931681 
 
This is the article and the pcn number it is attached to. 
 
 

---