This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'European Commission; First Stage of Infringement Proceeding'.

0x01 graphic

Data Access and Compliance Unit

Postal Point 6.25

Floor 6

102 Petty France

London

SW1H 9AJ

T 020 3334 5249

F 020 3334 2245

E [email address]

P. John

[FOI #13283 email]

10 August 2009

Ref: 60475

Dear Mr John,

Internal Review - Freedom of Information request

Thank you for your Internal Review request dated 13 July 2009. I conduct Internal Reviews for the Ministry of Justice and your case has been passed to me for investigation. The purpose of the Internal Review is to look at the basis of the original decision and investigate how the case was handled.

In the response you received from the Ministry of Justice you were informed that the information you requested is held by the Ministry of Justice, however, there were two exemptions which applied to this information which prevented its disclosure. These exemptions were section 27, international relations, and section 35, the formulation of government policy.

The Ministry of Justice conducted a public interest test into the usage of these exemptions and concluded that the balance lay in favour of withholding the information.

I have re-assessed your case and I have concluded that the original decision you received was correct. I have reached this conclusion through conducting two thorough public interest tests. In the first instance, two public interest tests should have been applied to the information you requested, reflecting the use of two separate qualified exemptions. I am sorry that you did not see a clear analysis of both exemptions in your first response. I have included a copy of the public interest tests I conducted in respect of section 27 and section 35. I hope this clarifies what points have been considered in relation to your request and why I have decided to withhold the information.

Section 27 Public Interest Test

Arguments against disclosure:

Arguments for disclosure:

Section 35 Public Interest Test

Arguments in favour of disclosure:

Arguments against disclosure:

In light of the above points, I have judged that there are stronger arguments against public disclosure. I am sorry that on this occasion I have been unable to present you with the information that you asked for and I hope I have provided you with an adequate explanation of why this has not been.

If you are not satisfied with my findings in this Internal Review you have a right to ask the Information Commissioner to review my decision. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at the following address:

The Information Commissioner's Office

Information Commissioner's Office

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

Cheshire

SK9 5AF

 

E-mail: www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

Hannah Wright

Data Access & Compliance Unit

Page 1