summary
ref
Project name
Excel version
Signed paper version
Proof of stage in planning process
Proof of status of budget
Region
Building type
Organisation type
Residential or 
New build or 
PERC score
PCLZC score
Planning score
Budget score
Total score
Total m2
Total project budget
RE costs total
Indicative grant request (on 40%)
running total
commercial
Refurbishment
LCB/2/10190
Mountgrange
yes
yes
yes
yes
Scotland
community, hotel, office, restaurant, retail, 
developer
other
new build + refurb
18
15
3
9
45
75525
115,000,000
810,000
324,000
2,702,880
residential, sports
Energy Saving Trust Confidential
19/06/2009
Page 1

---

summary
ref
Project name
RE costs as percentage of total budget (RE budget Start on site date
Completion date
TER
BER
PERC %
PERC LZC %
Technologies
Round
Final decision
rejection reason
Hywel Davies comments
Derek Taylor comments
Rod Hacker comments
per m2 x m2)
LCB/2/10190
Mountgrange
n/a
Apr-07
Jul-10 n/a
n/a
30%
22% GSHP
1 yes
n/a
With 90 boreholes, the project should be more cost effective 
than it seems to be. Boreholes would be good in granite. 
Energy Saving Trust Confidential
19/06/2009
Page 2

---

summary
ref
Project name
Faraz Baber cooments
Phil Jones comments
Kirk Archibald
Alessandra McConville
Mat Colmer
General comments, caveats
Clarification call by
ranking
LCB/2/10190
Mountgrange
YES
good regional spread, attractive project
10
Energy Saving Trust Confidential
19/06/2009
Page 3

---