London Asylum Seekers Consortium
NRUC Steering Group Meeting - Monday 8th December 2003
Venue: Manchester Town Hall, Albert Square, Manchester M60 2LA
Minutes of Meeting
Present:
Jasmine Ali - NRUC
Michael Gould - NRUC
Gwen Smithen (Minutes) - NRUC
Anne Burke - NASS
Glenda Gallacher - London Borough of Camden
Nadia Mobarak - Kent County Council
Barbara Donovan - Manchester City Council
Iain Low - Manchester City Council
Jim Laird - Scottish Asylum Seekers Consortium
Vicki Bennetts - Sheffield City Council
Stephen Murphy - Westminster City Council
Apologies:
Ilan Katz - DFES
Joe Heatley - NASS
Anthony Simm - IND
Helen Johnson - Refugee Council
Stephen Liddicott - Croydon Council
Carolyn Greenaway - London Borough of Barnet
Kamini Rambellas - Hillingdon Council
Victoria Williams - Leeds
________________________________________________________________
Agenda
1. Introductions
2. Matters and minutes arising (minutes 08/09/03)
3. Trends
4. Work Streams
5. Service Specification
6. NRUC Launch
7. PID and Milestones Review
8. Calendar
9. A.O.B
1. Introductions
JA opened meeting, welcomed and thanked everyone for traveling to Manchester. A high number of apologies noted from London.
JA informed and introduced Michael Gould as the newly appointed NRUC Team Manager.
2. MAMA (minutes of 08/09/03)
2.2 Review of Data Matching LASC/HO work
JA reported that there had been a review of data matching and that the 3 members of LASC staff recently seconded to the HO had completed this piece of work. MG reported that all LA's had recently been sent a request for `Raw Data', however had received up until 5th December 1/3 of responses, several LA's concerned about Data Protection and securing data, SM advised SG that the Enabling Legislation would take some time before it came into statutory force. JL recommended that this issue should be raised at the Project Board, (Ref no. IL.0013 of Issue Log). SM to draft a paper/guidelines by end of January - mid Feb '04.
AB to supply LA quarterly returns to MG and information around Data Protection.
Green Paper
AB informed SG that £10m has been allocated for post 18 year olds and that the monies would be distributed by the DfES.
3. TRENDS
MG reported of a fall in the number of UASC's in London as with the other categories, the leveling out of numbers in London is also reflected nationally.
JA requested information on various routes of trafficking, AB to supply this information. JA suggested that trafficking should be added to the Work Streams, VB to nominate a delegate to assist in this piece of work. GG informed SG that her team are currently collating statistics on the number of UASC's entering the country on European passports with `agent's.
4. Work Streams
JA gave an update of the following 4 Work Streams:-
Technical Management Group
To date have had 4 constructive meetings (see item 5 Service Spec). IL offered future contributions to the group.
Access and Referrals
KR to lead this group, VB agreed to assist on this group.
Commissioning Strategies and Project Team Processes
MG requested volunteers or nominees for this group, email to [email address], AB offered assistance on this group.
Quality
JA and JL currently working on obtaining quotes for Project Assurance Role from external organisations, a recent quote has been received from ACIT Services and a further quote to follow by CAP Gemini.
5. Service Specification
SM gave a presentation on the Service Specification as follows, (final version to go to Project Board for approval on 10/12/03):-
NRUC System Requirement Specification
The system is anticipated to contain about 10,000 to 15,000 live records.
The system will be web based.
The system will be accessed by 150 Local Authorities (5 users per LA) and by the London Asylum Seekers Consortium.
The system will be fully e-GIF compliant.
Options for Operational Environment
A managed service - all hardware located at supplier's site.
A supported service - all hardware located at LASC site (The ALG, CoW?) but with remote support for operating system and DBA work, website maintenance and security etc.
Product only - all hardware located at LASC site (The ALG or CoW) and management of the operating system and database levels undertaken by LASC.
Relationship to A-CID
UASCs will be defined by the entry on the A-CID Database held by the Central Point of Contact.
The basic records on the NRUC will be created and periodically refreshed by an interface with A-CID.
V12 (and Annex B for NASS) information can be provided via NRUC, the information being added to the base information provided via the A-CID interface.
Use by Local Authorities
Check to see if presenting UASC is on the register.
Update Annex B and V12 data to facilitate the returns, which will be made through NRUC.
Will not be able to add records. Queries re the asylum status or age of a presenting UASC not on the register are to be resolved with CPC.
The role of LASC
Will be responsible for systems administration at the application level.
Will take responsibility for data quality.
Will provide a bureau service for Local Authorities submitting queries or requiring reports.
Perceived Benefits
Single source for all UASC records: A-CID.
Las can check NRUC directly to ascertain UASC status and details.
Annex B and V12 returns for UASCs will be easier - adding to data already there.
Data quality will improve through imposing a coded data structure.
More streamlined verification of returns.
Outstanding Issues
Interface between A-CID and NRUC needs to be agreed and developed (development blight within IND).
Uncertain what to make the Primary Key - there are issues re the Home Office Number.
The system will require some changes in business processes for IND and Las.
JA thanked SM for excellent presentation.
6. NRUC Launch
JA reported on a recent meeting held with a WCC Communications Officer regarding the NRUC Launch and full media coverage, the CO requested a `shopping list' of requirements, JA also requested an inventory of costs for advertisement with trade magazines such as Community Care, Housing Today and Local Government Chronical and asked the SG to agree in principal (see Communications Strategy, pages 6-10).
JA informed the SG that the Launch was currently in the planning stage and that the proposed venue would be at the LGA in May 2004. Depending on diary commitments JA informed SG that the Guest Speakers would be Julie Jones (WCC) as President, Peter Gilroy (KCC) and possibly Beverley Hughes.
7. PID and Milestones Review
JA advised SG that the PID and Milestones Review would be updated and circulated shortly after the Project Board meeting (10/12/03).
The SG discussed the collection of data for NRUC and agreed that the Register should officially be linked to the Grant Claim. AB raised concern about LA's with very small numbers, although agreed in principal and expressed it should be pushed as an advantage.
GG raised concerns with age dispute cases and problems on working with the HO on this issue. JA proposed that AB and AS attends a meeting in January to bottom-out the issues raised. AB requested the number of age disputes currently on system.
JL advised SG that the Risk Log should be actively utilized and that issues should be resolved positively and promptly. JL expressed that there must be ownership of each risk (internal/external) and that the Risk Log is monitored. JA added that the SG has been systematic in identifying risks.
The following items have been entered on the NRUC Risk Log:-
Ref No. |
Date |
Author |
Description |
Action |
IL.0009 |
08/12/03 |
SM |
Interface between A-CID and NRUC needs to be agreed |
For resolution at Project Board mtg. 10/12/03 |
IL.0010 |
08/12/03 |
BD |
Concerns regarding age dispute cases between HO and LA's |
Meeting with Technical Work Stream group, JA and HO |
IL.0011 |
08/12/03 |
JL |
Q. Classification of children left behind after parents give removal directions (S.54) |
For resolution at Project Board mtg. 10/12/03 |
8. Calendar and Next Meetings
Project Board - 10 Dec 2003
Work Stream meetings (each group) - End Dec/Jan `04/Feb 2004
Steering Group meeting - 8 March 2004
NRUC Launch - Second week of May 2004 (to confirm)
Project Board - 15 March 2004
Progress Report to Treasury - 23 March 2004
9. A.O.B
LASC Communications Strategy
Introduction
LASC intend to launch the National Register of Unaccompanied Asylum seeking children (NRUC) project at a standalone event early in 2004. The purpose of the launch will be to raise the profile of the project with key audiences and unveil the website.
Following the launch event a programme of activity comprising internal and external communications has been designed to extend awareness of the project ensure it continues to command a high profile with its audiences and to publicise the successes of the project.
Westminster Communications has designed a communications strategy to maximise opportunities to build awareness of this innovative project.
Timetable of activity
Stage 1: Preplanning - Preparation for launch - January/February 2004
Website designed and tested ahead of public launch, agreement of content material and interactivity.
Design and style of electronic newsletter agreed, delivery mechanism and detail for circulation list agreed.
Stage 2: Raising Awareness - The launch event and engaging stakeholders - Spring 2004
Launch Event, including venue booking, all aspects of event logistics, such as catering, signage, key speakers and speech writing
Guest List, subject to liaison with LASC to include guest co-ordination, invitation design, mail out and follow up, Name badges and room layout
Media Activity including photography, press release, media pack, target media list and follow up
Stage 3: Consolidating awareness - Summer 2004
Media campaign to highlight website activity, examples of success and build profile of LASC and project as delivering case studies of success, reuniting families, delivering financial savings.
First edition of electronic newsletter to key stakeholders to hold interest in project and website and demonstrate early success.
Delivery of template for future editions of electronic newsletter.
Speaker opportunities at relevant professional conferences/meetings sought.
Stage 3: Evaluation and testing of core messaging - Autumn 2004
Survey of stakeholders to determine awareness of NRUC and website usage.
Edition of electronic newsletter used to evaluate understanding and reach of website and project amongst key stakeholders.
Stage 4: Case study of success - Winter 2004
Media activity - Case studies demonstrating success in financial, and humanitarian terms, revisiting and updating individual stories and delivering a wider message around success of asylum seeking families to integrate into mainstream society.
Stakeholder engagement - Delivery of electronic newsletter to reinforce positive messaging.
Why Westminster Communications
Westminster Council Communications, with a strong record of issue management and robust media handling, will be well positioned to provide advice and assistance to LASC to deal with individual case studies as well as deliver high profile cases.
Client Liaison
This account would be overseen by Julia Corkey who would act as account director. The account team will comprise a media officer to deliver the media relations aspects of the campaign along with marcomms and creative design officers and web editor to deliver the different aspects of the agreed strategy. The press office at Westminster would handle all media enquiries relating to this project and the project would therefore benefit from our 24/7 365 day a year media handling operation.
We propose full account meetings with the LASC Project Director on a monthly basis or at a frequency to be agreed. Between meetings there would be regular contact and a short email progress report will be submitted to LASC's Project Director on a weekly basis and the Westminster Account Director would be available to attend LASC Steering Group meetings and Project Boards as required.
Credentials
Knowledge:
The Communications team at Westminster by nature of its position has extensive experience of working within the public sector environment. As the corporate team we lead on all media relations and major campaigns for Westminster Council. The team also has responsibility for all marketing communications. The team is used to dealing with communications issues ranging from the extremes of crisis management through to positioning the Council in leading player in the fight to ensure fair funding for London.
Skills:
The team at Westminster has the full mix of communications skills. As an in-house service we have built up a team with extensive media relations skills, internal communications, full marketing mix and lobbying which we now also market to external clients. In addition to this the team is adept at project management with systems in place to `control' and evaluate all marketing projects. We're strong on budget management - we manage an overall budget of £1million. In addition to this individual projects have budgets ranging from £5,000 for a small project to £250,000 for a major event. All staff are responsible for managing project budgets and the management team takes overall control of the team's budget.
Experience:
The award winning team at Westminster has undertaken major campaigns within Westminster's Civic Renewal framework. This year we won the Institute of Public Relations Local Government group Media award.
An example of the work we have undertaken to promote the Council's City Guardian programme. The Communications Team has devised an ongoing programme of activity, designed to inform Westminster's publics about the work being undertaken to improve public safety in the West End achieving national and international coverage.
Activities we have undertaken include joint campaigns with the Metropolitan Police about the dangers of spiked drinks targeting West End club goers; a campaign targeting young women to raise awareness of the issue of unlicensed minicabs delivered in partnership with Transport for London and a media campaign to highlight the work and successes of the City Guardians in tackling antisocial behaviour.
All these activities underline our core message that the Council is determined to tackle crime and antisocial behaviour in Westminster.
The team has experience of producing the full range of marketing material both for end users e.g. City visitors and residents, an example being a card produced to publicise the locations of public conveniences in the City or internal audiences e.g. staff and service users.
Through a lobbying campaign in the national media Westminster Council's Communications Team helped secure an additional £818,000 funding for the Local Education Authority. This success was due to the Communications Team ability to constantly simplify and condense complex and dry topics into interesting stories and hooks for journalists.
This is the team's core responsibility and is a good example of thinking smart, not just punting out a statement and leaving it at that. Having previously established relationships with key journalists, the communications team got beyond `just another local authority moaning about money'. This is their skill and one we expect all members of the team to be able to deliver.
In addition Westminster has recently been awarded a contract to manage Richmond's communications and the team regularly works on external projects and pan-London initiatives.
The costings
|
|
Fixed Elements |
Variable Elements |
Actuals |
|
|
|
|
Basic Web-site design (includes home page and basic sections) |
£5,500 |
|
|
Design of electronic template (newsletter) |
£3,500 |
|
|
Survey and evaluation of findings |
|
£8,000 |
|
Media Officer to generate launch coverage and deliver ongoing media coverage, based on one and a half days per week |
£1200 per month |
|
Professional Fees |
|
|
|
|
Launch Event management (excluding external fees such as event hire, catering and materials which will be charged at cost) |
£5,000 |
|
Day rates |
|
|
|
|
Should LASC wish to purchase additional support outside the activities above our day rates are as follows:
Head of Communications Head of Marketing Communications/Media Relations Media Officer Marcomms Officer Web Editor Copywriter |
£450
£300 £200 £200 £200 £150 |
|
Disbursements and VAT
There will be 5% fee to cover the management of external suppliers e.g. Web-site design and purchasing of goods or material i.e. backdrops. This will not apply when our in-house design team is used for example for the design of templates etc.
Travel expenses will be charged to the client for attendance of the team at relevant meetings e.g. Steering Group meetings and Project Boards.
All fees will be subject to VAT at the standard rate of 17.5%.
Evaluation
The project can be evaluated through the following ways:
Analysis of media coverage based on assessment of volume, favourability and key messages.
Response to and usage of the website.
Analysis of support and understanding based on repeat surveys of key stakeholders.
Independent survey evaluation of key stakeholders.
Evaluation is vital to the success of Westminster's Communications Team. We evaluate media, marketing and internal communication campaigns through the use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation techniques ranging from questionnaires, telephone surveys, focus groups through to media reach, balance and equivalent advertising spend.
We would very much like to work with LASC on this innovative project and would be happy to discuss any aspect of this proposal in greater detail.
SUZANNA WHITE
WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL
December 2003
1
4
Date of next Steering Group Mtg: Monday 8 March 2004, 11.00am - 1.00pm
Venue: ALG Offices, 59½ Southwark Street, London SE1 OAL