This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'BBC News Website'.
 
 
Mr Paul Grimshaw 
[FOI #10849 email] 
 
 
May 21, 2009 
 
Dear Mr Grimshaw 
 
RFI20090602
 - Freedom of Information request 
 
Thank you for your email/letter of April 22nd making the following request: 
 
1.  How does the BBC News website allocate stories to the positions they appear? e.g. how does a story appear 
in the top three positions on the main page? Please feel free to use as much technical/statistical explanation 
as you need. 

2.  Why would a story appear in the top position of a category, say politics, but a lower story on the politics 
page is shown in the top three on the main page. 
3.  Specifically, a week ago a story about 'Smeargate' was listed in the politics section of the website. This story 
was not shown on the main page in any of the top three positions or in the Other TOP stories section, but 
another political story was even though the other story was lower in its own politics page. Why and how did 
this happen? 

 
The reference number for your request is RFI20090602. 
 
Please note that your request is outside the scope of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the Act”) but 
we are happy to provide you with some information on this occasion. 
 
The main point to make is that the website is not a linear news medium in the same way that a traditional 
radio or TV news bulletin is. While the top story wil  generally be that considered most important, the 
other two main slots on the front page are filled using different criteria. Clearly the importance of a story is 
a factor, but we also take into account those stories which are likely to be of particular interest to a web 
audience. So technology stories and entertainment stories, which always feature highly in the "Most 
Popular" lists, may be included in the second or third slots when in a normal TV bulletin they may feature 
much lower down the order. 
 
As for the comparison between specialist indexes and the front page, it may be that a story will have 
greater resonance or be part of a long-running issue with a particular genre. So a story about house prices 
 

rising or falling according to one company might be considered a lead item on the Business index, but might 
not feature on the main page as it is one of a number of such statistical stories. There are other 
considerations that may influence decisions: 
 
•  It could be that a specialist index has a lead story which is its own take on another of the day's main 
stories, and we don’t wish to have two stories on the same topic. 
•  Indexes are edited by different people who may make different judgements. 
•  The main index turns over quite quickly, and it could be that by mid-morning, a story has already 
featured prominently and been replaced while still leading a specialist index. 
•  We could already have a story about, for example, Gordon Brown on a health or technology issue and 
not wish to have another Gordon Brown story on the front page. 
•  There are different ways of promoting stories, and while a report might not be in the top three, it 
could be a link from the top story or promoted elsewhere on the site from a special promotional box 
etc. 
 
It's difficult to answer the "Smeargate" query without knowing which other story is being referred to. But it 
might be that while the Smeargate story is an important political story, for a wider audience it was felt that 
the latest twists and turns were not that significant. It all comes back to the fact that while a story might be 
worth doing, we know from page views etc the stories which are more likely to be of interest to our 
audience. 
 
We hope you find this helpful. Your request is outside the scope of the Act because the BBC and the other 
public service broadcasters are covered by the Act only in respect of information held for purposes “other 
than those of journalism, art or literature” (see Schedule I, Part VI of the Act). However, on this occasion 
we’re happy to respond to your request.  For more information about how the Act applies to the BBC 
please see www.bbc.co.uk/foi. Please note that this guidance is not intended to be a comprehensive legal 
interpretation of how the Act applies to the BBC. 
 
The BBC does not offer an internal review when the information requested is not covered by the Act. If 
you disagree with our decision you can appeal to the Information Commissioner. Contact details are: 
Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF telephone 
01625 545 700. http://www.ico.gov.uk/ 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
Stephanie Harris 
Head of Accountability 
BBC News