From: Gillian Bernadt
Sent: 07 November 2007 12:23
To: Simon Hoets
Cc: Mark Stevenson; Stuart Harrison; Pratima Ahuja; Julia Worboys
Subject: RE: Profitable Plots (PP)

Hi Simon,

I’m just going to provide comments on DLP’s statement (in italics below) as opposed to the general issues which we’re all well aware of.

 

I can confirm that the information regarding DLP’s submission of initial information in February, followed by a representation to the Core Strategy Issues and Options Development Sites consultation (submitted 30 July 2007) is correct. If you or Sharif Ibrahim are interested in seeing these submissions I can forward copies. DLP Planning appear to be well aware of the timeframes involved in the preparation of the Core Strategy and Site Allocations. However, it should be noted that the Preferred Options consultation, scheduled for June 2008, is not timed to allow completion of the Further Alterations to the London Plan as stated, but is a timescale set by the Council in its Local Development Scheme (2007).  

 

In relation to the Borough’s green belt boundaries, although these will be reviewed in a study over the next year or so, any changes will not come into effect until the adoption of the Council’s Core Strategy and Site Allocations DPD, both estimated for June 2010.

 

In relation to the (draft) Further Alterations of the London Plan, DLP’s statement indicates that the Further Alterations would enable eventual allocation of Concorde Village. This does not appear to be the case and the Further Alterations states that Boroughs should consider proposals on alterations to the Green Belt through the DPD process, as is being done, in accordance with PPG2.  In essence, the Further Alterations Policy 3D.4 is unchanged from London Plan Policy 3D.8 Green Belt and maintains protection for the Green Belt, stating that inappropriate development should not be approved except in very special circumstances. The permanence of the Green Belt and its boundary is highlighted in para 3.247. There is an addition at the end of this policy, but this relates to encouragement of positive uses (ie those compatible with Green Belt) to improve the quality and accessibility of the land while meetings its statutory purposes. The Further Alterations are due to be published early next year.

 

Please let me know if you have any queries or require any further detail about this.

 

Kind regards,

Gillian Bernadt

 

Planning Policy Officer

Strategic Planning Policy

Borough Planning Department

Hounslow Council

020 8583 5214

 


From: Simon Hoets
Sent: 30 October 2007 11:03
To: Gillian Bernadt
Subject: RE: Profitable Plots (PP)

 

Not particularly urgent and nothing very detailed needed I don't think. End of next week???       Simon

-----Original Message-----
From: Gillian Bernadt
Sent: 30 October 2007 10:47
To: Simon Hoets
Cc: Stuart Harrison; Mark Stevenson
Subject: RE: Profitable Plots (PP)

Yes of course – when do you need the policy comment by?

Regards,

Gillian


From: Simon Hoets
Sent: 30 October 2007 09:53
To: Gillian Bernadt
Subject: FW: Profitable Plots (PP)

 

Gillian  --  Could you please let me have a policy comment on the attached please?

 

Simon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Hoets
Sent: 30 October 2007 09:51
To:
Subject: RE: Profitable Plots (PP)

Thank you for your email.

 

The information you have sent me sounds like submissions by DLP on behalf of PP in respect of the development plan review that I referred to in my earlier email. It isn't a pre planning application enquiry as such but, I suspect, proposes that the "Concorde Village" site has its green belt designation removed. I will forward your email to my colleagues in the Planning Policy team for comment and get back to you.

 

Simon Hoets

-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: 30 October 2007 07:32
To: Simon Hoets
Subject: RE: Profitable Plots (PP)

Dear Simon Hoets,
 
Thank you for your last email back in September. I have been trying to do more research on Profitable Plots. As such, they have just given all their clients online accounts to which PP even provided pdf documents they have supposedly proposed to Hounslow Borough Council regarding the so-called Concorde Village. They even claim to be sorting out the green belt issue. I have attached all relevant documents for your perusal.

Below in italics is the latest announcement they have made in my online account, whereby they (or their partner, DLP Consultants) specifically claim to have contacted Hounslow Borough Council. I apologise if it is too long, or if there are too many attachments, but my ultimate and hopefully final question here for you is, can you confirm if has anyone in the Council seen any of these attached documents, anytime, or anyone connected to DLP or Profitable Plots. If no one has, then I will be approaching the company to demand explanations and make amends, not only for myself, but for many other unknowing investors in many countries. Thank you so much for your help again, Mr. Hoets. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
 
 
Yours Truly,


Latest Report from DLP Consultants:

Following the submission of documentation to Hounslow Borough Council in February 2007 advocating the allocation of the site in the forthcoming Local Development Framework documents the Council launched a formal public consultation exercise in June.

 

The consultation comprised two parts.  The first was to seek views on the issues and options that will underpin the Core Strategy for Hounslow – the Core Strategy is the first of a suite of development plan documents that will in due course replace the current Unitary Development Plan.

Representations were made supporting the view that Hounslow cannot be treated as a single entity for the purposes of future planning due to the diversity of different issues that arise in the Borough which stretches from the urban areas of Chiswick to the boundaries with the County of Surrey.  There is, we believe, a strong case to take a different approach to strategic planning in the western half of the Borough – in which
Concorde Village is located – where there are fewer opportunities for urban regeneration but where there is vacant and under utilised land that can deliver positive planning benefits.

 

The second part of the consultation was an invitation to submit comments on potential development sites that could contribute to future housing and employment provision.  In making our response to this part of the consultation DLP Planning submitted a revised, edited and updated version of the document submitted in February 2007.

 

These submissions have been acknowledged by the Council who will now consider the representation as part of the process of defining a Preferred Option which will be subject to further consultation, presently scheduled to take place in June 2008 (timed to allow completion of the Further Alterations to the London Plan).

 

The public examination of the Further Alterations to the London Plan took place in June 2007.  DLP Planning adopted the role of observer reflective of the fact that no fundamental changes are required to this document in order to secure the eventual allocation of Concorde Village.  The Report of the Panel is expected to be received by the Mayor of London at the end of September 2007.

 

Meanwhile, the Phase 2 Contaminated Land Report for COncorde Village has been received.  Mott Macdonald, a leading geo-environmental consultancy, carried out an initial appraisal of the site during 2006 and recommended further more detailed investigation of the land to establish the true extent of any contamination and landfilling known to have taken place prior to the change in legislation on waste disposal in 1974.  Their investigations have taken over six months to complete, including the analytical studies carried out on the results obtained from numerous boreholes across the site.  The extent of landfill and contamination confirms the original expectation that some remedial work will be necessary but that there is nothing within the site which would prevent its development or lead to abnormal costs. 

Overall their conclusions are that the level of contamination is not considered to be excessive, and it is considered that it should be possible to develop parts of the site without excessive expenditure on remediation.

 

The detailed analysis of the site is now being subject to close scrutiny which will lead to the review, if necessary, of the draft Master Plan


Subject: Profitable Plots (PP)
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:51:33 +0100
From: xxxxx.xxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
To:
CC: xxxxx.xxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx; xxxxxxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx

 Your email has been passed to me for a response. You ask four questions and I will respond to each as you have put them.
!. I understand that PP purchased the site from Taylor Woodrow a couple of years ago but I have seen no evidence of this so can not confirm it. I do know that other people have questioned this.
2. The area that PP refer to as 'Concorde Village' is not known as such by this Council or, so far as I'm aware, by anyone else who is not connected in some way with PP. The area is a brownfield site by virtue of the fact that it has been previously developed in the past - in this case as a sand and gravel pit. This Council's development plan (Unitary Development Plan) designates the land as being within the Metropolitan Green Belt and also as a nature conservation area. The fact that it is a brownfield site is of no statutory relevance. The UDP is a statutory document that guides development (ie planning applications). Development within green belts is very restricted and housing development, such as that that I understand PP to be promoting, has little chance of getting planning permission in current circumstances. You can read the UDP on the Council's website (www.hounslow.gov.uk). Development plan policies are reviewed from time to time and green belt boundaries are due to be reviewed during the next 12 months; however I know of no reason to believe that this site will stop being green belt within the foreseeable future.
3.  There have been no planning applications for the residential development of this land, nor has this Council been approached, so far as I'm aware, with any such proposals prior to a planning application. In my position as development control area manager I would expect to be aware of any such enquiries.
4.  I am not a lawyer and can not therefore advise you about legal matters.
I hope this helps.

Simon Hoets
Acting Area Planning Manager
London Borough of Hounslow

Please consider the environment before printing this message.


Hounslow Council routinely monitors the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for the purposes of ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures. The contents of this message are for the attention and use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to them, you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful. If you receive this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender immediately. Where opinions are expressed they are not necessarily those of the London Borough of Hounslow.

This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate content.

 


Are you the Quizmaster? Play BrainBattle with a friend now!