-----Original Message-----
From: Julia Worboys
Sent: 19 October 2007 17:22
To: Brendan Tinney
Cc: Pratima Ahuja
Subject: RE: Concorde Village/Profitable Plots.

Brendan

 

Pratima is off on Monday and drafted a response which we have set in blue below.  Not much to add to your comments to be honest.

 

Julia

-----Original Message-----
From: Brendan Tinney
Sent: 19 October 2007 14:52
To: Pratima Ahuja
Subject: FW: Concorde Village/Profitable Plots.

Pratima,

 

If you could have a look at the questions set out below and reply that would be great. Otherwise let me know what you think and I'll get back to him.

 

Cheers.

Brendan.

-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: 19 October 2007 13:57
To: Brendan Tinney
Subject: Re: Concorde Village/Profitable Plots.

Dear Brendan

 

Thank you for your quick reply.

 

By your reply i surmise that while the land is not likely to get planning permission in the the next year , you can't rule out the possibility of it NEVER getting planning permission in the medium to long term ie in the next 5 years. 

 

Whilst we aer unable to predict significant changes to national and regional policy, any developer of the site would need to demonstrate exceptional circumstances before any sort of major development could take place in the green belt.

 

Also the fact that it is possible to build on greenbelt since you did not confirm that the developments in the north west are indeed on greenbelt land.

 

The 'Profitable Plots' site is within the Borough's green belt.

 

You mentioned forseeable future which is a relatively vague term..what would you define as the forseeable future. I also understand from my discussions with the kind people at the Mayor's office that the London Plan itself is undergoing a review and the area around Heathrow has been designated a Opportunity Area so its not possible to exclude changes to the greenbelt or development in this area. Would you be in agreement with this ?

 

Hounslow Council has had very early meetings with the GLA on the Heathrow South Opportunity area and does not at present have any plans to undertake further work on this project.  Any review of the existing Green Belt boundary is a separate exercise but will be undertaken through the local plan making process in the context of national and regional guidance which seeks to maintain the protection of London's green belt.

 

 The other thing i wanted to know was whether the site itself has ever been used as a graveyard or if it could be designated as such. 

 

You would need to request a land search to determine the history of the site.  You would also need to request the designation of the site through the planning making process and provide evidence to support any such proposal. 

 

The reason I am asking this is to evaluate the site for future long term personal investment. I do understand that while there might not any immediate plans , changes in the forseeable future could open this site up to development as has happened to many such sites..for example Stockley Park. Would you disagree with this statement?

 

Stockley Park is outside the borough of Hounslow so we are not able to provide comments on this development.

 

The people at Profitable Plots have been most upfront about the long term nature of land investment and its heartening to note your confirmation of their submissions to the council. Of course i am tempted to ask if these opinions that you forward are your personal views or do they reflect the current policy of the council which can be subject to change with the change in policies in the forseeable future.

 

The policy of the Council is that development will only be permitted in the green belt if exceptional circumstances can be demonstrated in accordance with national planning guidance.

 

Would the increase in the need for housing and jobs in the area neccessitate a change in prevailing policies. I would also like your forebearance in answering some of my earlier questions.

 

To consider a site in the green belt it would have to be demonstrated that we could not achieve our current target for new housing development.  The Council has demonstrated that we have enough housing land on previously developed (brownfield) sites available to meet its housing target for a least the next 8 years, and potentially considerably longer.

 

We have also demonstrated through a recent development plan document that we have enough existing land capacity to meet current employment growth projections for at least the next 10 years.

 

Many thanks

 

warm regards

 

----- Original Message ----
From: Brendan Tinney <xxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
To:
Sent: Friday, 19 October, 2007 4:53:53 PM
Subject: Concorde Village/Profitable Plots.

,

Your e-mail query to Simon Hoets has been forwarded to me from Pat Boissieux. We have received a number of queries on this subject and have set out below our response.

My understanding is that 'Profitable Plots' own this site in Chertsey Road. The site is part of London's Metropolitan Green Belt and is mostly also identified as a nature conservation area in the Hounslow Unitary Development Plan. Both of these designations mean that residential development is very unlikely to be acceptable. If you would like further information about green belt policy you could look up PPG2 (UK Government Planning Policy Guidance on green belts). This will tell you that any building construction in green belts, other than in exceptional circumstances, has little chance of getting planning permission. You can also see the London Borough of Hounslow's Unitary Development Plan online (hounslow.gov.uk) and this will give you the same message.

What I can not confirm is whether or not the site will remain part of the green belt. Profitable Plots have made a case to the Council to have it excluded. This will be considered at the appropriate time in the future - certainly not in the immediate future. The indications are that the likelihood of exclusion is limited.

In previous queries it has been stated that PP have indicated that there is a current planning application and that we have asked for a higher density. This isn't the case if we are talking about the Chertsey Road site - and I can't think of another that it might be confused with. I wonder if there might be a misunderstanding about the term 'planning permission'?

In conclusion, in my opinion there is no chance whatever of this land not being green belt this time next year. And this means that the chances of a speculative planning permission being granted, within this time, for residential development is next to nil. The chances for such a permission over the longer period depend upon major changes to the planning regime - not impossible to imagine but, in my personal view, unlikely in the foreseeable future.

Regards,
Brendan Tinney.

___________________________________________________
Brendan Tinney - Planning Officer
West Area Team
London Borough of Hounslow - TW3 4DN
Tel +44 (0)20 8583 4992 Fax +44 (0)20 8583 4900
xxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx <mailto:xxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
www.hounslow.gov.uk <http://www.hounslow.gov.uk>

Please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary
And RECYCLE printed copies when no longer needed.
___________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this message.


Hounslow Council routinely monitors the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for the purposes of ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures. The contents of this message are for the attention and use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to them, you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful. If you receive this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender immediately. Where opinions are expressed they are not necessarily those of the London Borough of Hounslow.

This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate content.

 

 


For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For Good this month.